Glyxambi
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 143
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

   Table of Contents      
ARTICLE
Year : 1964  |  Volume : 12  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 65-67

Effect of topical hydrocortisone and dionine on healed trachoma


Trachoma Research Centre, A.M.U. Institute of Ophthalmology, Aligarh, India

Date of Web Publication14-Feb-2008

Correspondence Address:
H V Nema
Trachoma Research Centre, A.M.U. Institute of Ophthalmology, Aligarh
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Nema H V, Shukla B R, Bal A. Effect of topical hydrocortisone and dionine on healed trachoma. Indian J Ophthalmol 1964;12:65-7

How to cite this URL:
Nema H V, Shukla B R, Bal A. Effect of topical hydrocortisone and dionine on healed trachoma. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 1964 [cited 2019 Dec 13];12:65-7. Available from: http://www.ijo.in/text.asp?1964/12/2/65/39077

Table 2

Click here to view
Table 2

Click here to view
Table 1

Click here to view
Table 1

Click here to view
At present there is no exact method of knowing when the agent of tra­choma is definitely destroyed or ren­dered inactive. Many attempts have been made in the past to distinguish healed trachoma from trachoma of low activity by the local application of copper sulphate, silver nitrate, staphy­lococcal toxoid, toxin of Koch Weeks bacillus, placental extract and corti­costeroid. Interest in cortisone as pro­vocative test was stimulated by the investigations of Ormsby and co­workers (1952), who reported that the topical use of the hormone caused re­activation of inclusion conjunctivitis. Several other workers including Frey­che and Nataf (1953), Thygeson (1953), Nataf and associates (1955) and Moh­senine and Darougar (1957) found re­crudescence of cured trachoma after local cortisone treatment. On the other hand, Mitsui described both po­sitive and negative results in his large series of cases. The present study was, therefore, undertaken to elucidate the validity of cortisone as a provocative test in trachoma and further to ex­plore the effect of dionine solution on lealed trachoma.

Material and Method :

In this study, 395 primary school children of Aligarh between 5 - 12 years of age were examined with the help of binocular loupe (magnification 2.5 times). Out of these, 91 were found to be suffering from healed trachoma (trachoma IV). The diagnostic criterion was based on W.H.O. classification (1955). All these children were ex­amined again on slitlamp and the find­ings in detail were recorded on W.H.O./UNICEF individual record cards. Conjunctival scraping was taken from every child and inclusion positive or cases showing specific cytology of trachoma (Thygeson, 1946) consisting of polymorphonuclear cells, plasma cells, lymphoblasts and dis­tinctive macrophages (Leber cells) were excluded. These children were then randomly allocated into three groups (A, B & C). Group A was put on hydrocortisone 1% (Efcorlin­Glaxo), group B on dionine aqueous solution 2% and group C (control) on liquid paraffin drops. The treatment schedule followed in all three groups, was thrice daily applications of medi­caments. First, second and final clini­cal and cytological examinations (blind) were done after 9 (3 days), 15 (5 days) and 27 (11 days) applica­tions respectively in each group. Slides collected at each examination were stained by Giemsa technique and ex­amined for the presence of H.P. in­clusions and specific cytology of tra­choma.

Results:

Results obtained during the study are tabulated in [Table - 1],[Table - 2].


  Discussion Top


The problem of distinguishing heal­ed trachoma from trachoma of low activity with any degree of certainty has yet to be resolved, though for all practical purposes, a combination of all the negative clinical and cytological signs has made it possible to assess a probable cure of this disease. Our work deferred from that reported by other workers investigating provocative effect of cortisone on healed trachoma in two ways. Firstly it had the advantage of a control study to rule out any possibili­ty of reinfection amongst children, secondly the application of dionin so­lution which is frequently used in ophthalmic practice, but has not receiv­ed due attention in its role of reactiva­tion of a smouldering infection.

it is evident from [Table - 1] that hydro­cortisone and dionine solution could produce recrudescence in six and nine cases in groups A and B respectively, while group C (control) showed no re­activation. The maximum recrudes­cence was observed after 11 days (27 applications), which may be the mini­mum period for such a test [Table - 2]. On the basis of these findings we feel that cortisone has some role in the reactivation of healed trachoma as re­ported by Freyche & Nataf (1953), Thygeson (1953) and Mohsenine & Darougar (1957). Moreover, Nataf and coworkers (1955) using a 2% cortisone acetate solution and administering only one subconjunctival injection of 0.4 cc every three or four days, demonstrated reactivation in three out of eleven trachoma IV cases, eighteen out of thirty active trachoma cases and three out of five late trachoma III cases. Bietti (1955) believed that among other mechanical and clinical means em­ployed for reactivation of trachoma, locally applied steroids also could pro­duce more or less the appearance of inclusions if the cure has not been completed.

In the light of these reports it seems that cortisone has a provocative effect on latent trachoma, but the question whether nonreactivation after use of cortisone should be accepted as a certain criterion of cure remains yet to be answered. The recent studies of Wang and Graystone (1962) on the effect of cortisone on monkey trachoma has shown evidence of relapse and re­current infections in only 50% of ani­mals. Poleff (1962) in his personal communication expressed that corti­sone was capable of producing re­appearance of inclusions but not al­ways. Further Mitsui in a large series has reported equivocal results after cortisone treatment.

From our own observations, it is apparent that hydrocortisone caused reactivation in a small number of cases (16.2%). Therefore, in our opinion the acceptance of cortisone as a definite provocative test for the cure of tra­choma may not be taken without re­servation.

The trial with dionine solution 2% appeared to be more satisfactory and encouraging. We have had a larger number of reactivations as compared to the cortisone group. Though, sta­tistical analysis of the results showed that the percentage reactivation was not significant (t=1.40) for 64 degrees of freedom between the dionine and hydrocortisone groups. However, there is found to be increasing trend in the percentage reactivation rates from group A to group B.

The exact mode of reactivation of trachoma by dionine solution is not known. It may be due to its lympha­gogue and hyperoemic actions that the dormant virus is stimulated into acti­vity by some unknown cytochemical reactions. In the absence of a reliable criterion of cure, dionine may require further trial and confirmation by other workers.


  Summary Top


Effect of topical hydrocortisone 1% and dionine solution 2% was studied on 91 healed trachomatous primary school children. 16.2% and 31.0 re­activation was observed in hydrocor­tisone and dionine groups respectively. With small number of reactivation in hydrocortisone group, cortisone cannot be accepted as a certain criterion of cure of trachoma, while dionine with greater number of reactivation rate re­quires further consideration.[11]


  Acknowledgments Top


We are grateful to Indian Council of Medical Research for the facilities provided during this study and to Mr. N. R. Parthasarthy, Statistician, Trachoma Control Pilot Project for statistical analysis of the results.

 
  References Top

1.
Bietti G. B. (1955) Present Status of the Treatment of Trachoma by Chemo­therapy and Antibiotics. W.H.O./Tra­choma/39.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Freyche M. J., Nataf R., Maurin J. and Delon P. (1953), Cortisone as a Means of Establishing Criteria of Cure in Tra­choma. W.H.O./Trachoma/35.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Mitsui Y. cited in 8.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Mohsenine H. and Darougar S. (1957). Rev. Intern. Trach. 37, 336.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Nataf R., Maurin J. and Dupland P. (1955). The Use of Cortisone as a Test of Cure and a "Provocative Test" in Trachoma. W.H.O./Trachoma/36.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Ormsby H. L.. Thompson G. A., Cou­sineau G. G.. Lloyd L. A. and Hassard J. (1952) Amer. J. Ophthal. 12, 1811.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Poleff L. (1962), Personal Communica­tion.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Thygeson P. (1946) Amer. J. Ophthal. 29, 1499.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Thygeson P. (1953) Rev. Intern. Trach. 10, 450.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Wang S. P. and Grayston J. T. (1962) Ann. N.Y. Acad. Science 98 (1), 177.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
W.H.O. Expert Committee on Trach. (1955), W.H.O./Trach./67.  Back to cited text no. 11
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table - 1], [Table - 2]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Discussion
Summary
Acknowledgments
References
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1730    
    Printed27    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded0    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal