Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 287
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

   Table of Contents      
ARTICLE
Year : 1969  |  Volume : 17  |  Issue : 6  |  Page : 256-258

Effect of occlusion treatment for amblyopia at various ages


India

Date of Web Publication11-Jan-2008

Correspondence Address:
A M Gokhale
India

Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Gokhale A M, Gokhale S A. Effect of occlusion treatment for amblyopia at various ages. Indian J Ophthalmol 1969;17:256-8

How to cite this URL:
Gokhale A M, Gokhale S A. Effect of occlusion treatment for amblyopia at various ages. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 1969 [cited 2020 Oct 1];17:256-8. Available from: http://www.ijo.in/text.asp?1969/17/6/256/38550

Table 1

Click here to view
Table 1

Click here to view

  Introduction Top


The term occlusion is applied to that method of treatment whereby the vision of one eye is obscured either totally or partially, so that the patient is obliged to use the other eye.

Occlusion of the good eye in order to facilitate vision in a deviating eye is a well known and long established practice first advocated by de Buffon. [1]

Occlusion may be total, where the vision of one eye is completely obscur­ed, or partial in which only the acuity or the field of vision is reduced. Occlu­sion may also be diagnostic or thera­peutic and conventional or inverse. Conventional occlusion is occlusion of the fixing eye and inverse occlusion is that of the squinting eye.

According to Lyle and Jackson, [4] part-time occlusion along with exer­cises is also of value and may be used when full-time occlusion is impracti­cable, while according to Duke-Elder; [2] intermittent occlusion is not only value­less but harmful, as, firstly, the vision gained by occlusion treatment is rapid­ly and actively suppressed in the period of non-occlusion and secondly, abnor­mal retinal correspondence may deve­lop.

The amount of vision recoverable by occlusion depends upon the age of on­set of squint and the time for which inhibition has been operative. It is only possible to reclaim the vision which had at one time developed. Oc­clusion will therefore be relatively valueless in long-established cases which have had a uniocular squint with amblyopia since birth, as well as in those few cases wherein a failure of macular development or a traumatic central lesion has occurred. Till the age of 6, the later the squint develops, the better will be the visual recovery. If the onset of squint is after the age of 6, full vision may be regained. Ear­lier the treatment, faster the recovery. Feldman and Taylor [3] found that if visual acuity did not improve with a telescopic lens, the amblyopia did not respond to treatment.

According to Duke-Eider [2] , in child­ren of 5 to 10 years, 3 to 6 months of occlusion are required for full recovery. In young adults upto 25 prolonged oc­clusion, if persisted in for sufficiently long. may result in improvement in 50 per cent of cases; but the process is usually arduous and socio-economically difficult to be thoroughly undertaken. At an early stage, an attempt should be made to see if fusion is possible; if it is not so particularly in adolescents and adults, treatment of suppression should be discontinued as it will lead to dip­lopia.

According to Lyle and Jackson, [4] therapeutic conventional occlusion is mainly for children from infancy to 8 years old, provided central fixation is present.

Here is a report of 12 cases of adoles­cents and adults where occlusion treat­ment was found to be very successful.


  Material and Methods Top


In all cases, the age of the patient, refraction, visual acuity without and with glasses was noted and the fixa­tion was examined with the visuscope.

In all cases total, full-time and con­ventional occlusion was carried out. In some highly hypermetropic cases, ad­ditional lenses were prescribed for near vision for some days in the beginning of the occlusion treatment till the near vision improved to J1, or J 2 . Wher­ever possible the addition for near vi­sion was adjusted so that the patient could read the ordinary book print.

The occlusion treatment was super­vised and continued for 1 to 6 months. At each visit, the vision with glasses for distance and near was recorded.


  Discussion Top


From the report it is obvious that younger the age of the patient, quicker the recovery of vision. This has already been noted by several observers but what is surprising is the visual reco­very which occurred in patients aged 12 to 19 and even in a case aged 35 ! The vision of the patient aged 35 im­proved from finger counting 5 feet to 6/36 in a matter of one month. This rapid recovery of course would not have been possible without meticulous care by the patient. These cases indi­cate that there is a growing realization of unilateral amblyopia. Unless there is eccentric fixation, occlusion treat­ment should always be tried wherever it is socio-economically feasible.

In one case of eccentric fixation aged 10, the vision improved from 6/60 and N 12 to 6/9 and N5 within 6 months. In this patient, the fixation was only slightly eccentric. In the other case, the patient was 21 years old and the fixation was grossly ec­centric. The vision only improved from finger counting 5 feet to finger counting 8 feet in one month. This supports the established fact that the more eccentric the fixation the poorer the outcome.


  Summary Top


The theory of occlusion treatment and the observations of some import­ant authors are mentioned.

A report of 12 cases on which oc­clusion treatment was carried out is presented. Two of these cases had ec­centric fixation in the amblyopic eye and one patient was 35 years old. It is shown that occlusion treatment can work effectively even at the age of 35.


  Conclusions Top


1) Occlusion treatment is worth a trial in all cases of amblyopia wherever possible.

2) Younger the patient, faster the visual recovery after occlusion treatment.

3) More eccentric the fixation of amblyopic eye, poorer the result of conventional occlusion treatment

 
  References Top

1.
Buffon de: Bull. et Mem. de 1' Acad. de. Sc.. Supp. III, 174, as quoted in 2.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Duke-Elder, S. W.: 'Text-book of Oph­thalmology,' Vol. IV, pp. 3915 and 3916.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Feldman. J. B. and Taylor, A. F.: Ob­stacle to Squint Training-Amblyopia, Arch. of Ophth. 27, 851, (1942).  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Lyle T. K. and Jackson S.: `Practical Orthoptics in the Treatment of Squint', pp. 277, 280, 282.  Back to cited text no. 4
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table - 1]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Introduction
Material and Methods
Discussion
Summary
Conclusions
References
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2949    
    Printed29    
    Emailed2    
    PDF Downloaded0    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal