Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 1651
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

   Table of Contents      
ARTICLES
Year : 1970  |  Volume : 18  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 106-110

Electrophoretic analysis of lacrimal fluid proteins and demonstration of lysozyme in normal human tears


Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India

Correspondence Address:
SRK Malik
Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Malik S, Gupta A K, Berry R. Electrophoretic analysis of lacrimal fluid proteins and demonstration of lysozyme in normal human tears. Indian J Ophthalmol 1970;18:106-10

How to cite this URL:
Malik S, Gupta A K, Berry R. Electrophoretic analysis of lacrimal fluid proteins and demonstration of lysozyme in normal human tears. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 1970 [cited 2020 Jul 10];18:106-10. Available from: http://www.ijo.in/text.asp?1970/18/3/106/35073

Table 1

Click here to view
Table 1

Click here to view

  Introduction Top


The study of protein fractions of normal human tears was carried out at first by Smollens, Leopold and Par­ker (1949) using free electrophoretic technique of Tiselus.

Junnola (1952) using nephelome­tric method studied protein compo­nents of tears in thirty normal indivi­duals and found values ranging from 136-592 mg/100 c.c. with an average 360 mg/100 c.c.

Fractionation of lacrimal fluid pro­teins utilising the technique of electro­phoresis has been performed by many workesis. McEwen and Kimura (1955) and Erickson, Berg and Hatlen (1959) obtained three protein fractions while Brunish (1957) demonstrated five major fractions in normal human tears. Krause (1959), however, obtained six fractions by means of a paper electro­phoresis.

The fractionation of lacrimal fluid proteins by agar gel electrophoresis has been studied only by Francois and Rabaey (1960) and Tapaszto and Vass (1965).

In our study, the technique of agar gel electrophoresis has been used to analyse lacrimal fluid proteins and de­monstration of lysozyme.


  Methods and Materials Top


The lacrimal fluid was collected by means of a fine pipette- causing mini­mum irritation to the eye. About 0.25-0.5 cc. of lacrimal fluid was col­lected and used for electrophoresis.

Preparation of Agar Gel:

4 gms. of agar (Difco) was added to 100 c.c. of distilled water taken in a water bath to dissolve the agar completely. The dissolved agar was spread on a glass plate and allowed to set. One centimeter wider strips of agar gel were cut and repeatedly washed with distilled water. 100 gms. of purified agar were dissolved in 166 c.c. of half diluted buffer (PH 8.2, Mo 0.05) by heating on a water bath. This was filtered through eight thick­ness gauze and used for subsequent experiments.

Preparation of Vernol Buffer:

33 grams of sodium barbitonc were dissolved in two litres of distilled wa­ter. 3.5 c.c. of 12 N.1-Icl. were added to it and the contents of the bottle were thoroughly shaken. The pH of the solution was adjusted to 8.2 by adding more Hcl if needed.

Preparation of Slides:

4-5 c.c. of molten agar was poured on the slide and the agar allowcd to set. A slot was made in the centre and the lacrimal fluid to be analysed was put into the slot with the help of tuberculin syringe.

The protein fractions were separat­ed by agar gel electrophoresis using buffer of pH 8.2, Mo 0.05 at a potential difference of 30 Volts. on the ends of the slide (7.5 cms. by 2.5 cm.). The current was allowed to pass for 1.5 to 2 hours.

Fixation of Proteins:

The slide was taken out of the ele­ctrophoretic chamber and immersed in a fixation fluid (98 c.c. of rectified spirit and 2 c.c. of glacial acetic acid).

Drying and Staining of Slide:

The slide, after fixation, was dried at room temperature and stained with 1% amido black stain for 15 minutes and washed till the background was clear and then kept for drying.

Quantitative Estimation of Proteins:

The quantitative estimation of va­rious protein fractions was determin­ed with the help of Amil densitometer having a photosensitive cell. A graph was plotted and percentage of various fractions calculated.

Before starting, the electrophoresis of lacrimal fluid, the procedure was standardised on normal human serum. [Figure - 1].

Demonstration of Lysozyrne:

In Order to demonstrate the lyso­zyme fraction the agar gel slides were taken before the fixation of proteins. The agar gel from anode and cathode ends were collected in two different test tubes. A culture of saprophytic staphylococci was taken and put in both the test tubes containing agar gel. This was incubated at 37°C for 2 hours and then cultured on blood agar plates. The blood agar plate was divided into four quadrants. In the first quadrant fraction from the ano­de end and in the second quadrant agar gel from the cathode side was inoculated. The third quadrant was inoculated with culture of saprophy­tic staphylococci and the fourth qua­drant was left blank.

This plate was incubated at 37˚C for 24 hours and then examined. The fraction containing lysozyme will cause lysis of bacteria and hence that quadrant will show no growth while the quadrant devoid of lysozyme will have unrestricted growth of bacteria.


  Observations Top


The electrophoretic pattern of lac­rimal fluid proteins in normal human beings revealed five major fractions with a maximum of eight subfractions. Fractions I and II moved towards the cathode while the fractions III, IV and V and moved towards the anode [Table - 1], [Figure - 2].

On comparing the mobilities of normal lacrimal fluid proteins with that of normal human serum it was seen that fraction I had the mobility corresponding to gamma globulins, fraction II between alpha 2 and beta 1 globulins, fraction III had the same mobility as alpha 1 globulins, fraction IV had the mobility corresponding to serum albumin and fraction V had the mobility which was slightly higher than that of serum albumin.

Lysozyme Demonstration:

On examining the four quadrants of the culture plate [Figure - 3] after 24 hours (already described in methods and materials), it was observed that quadrant `A' which represented frac­tion from the anode side showed growth of saprophytic staphylococci: quadrant `S' in which normal sapro­phytic staphylococci were inoculated also showed positive growth; quadrant `C' which contained the fraction from the cathode end did not show any growth indicating that lysis of sapro­phytic staphylococci had occurred and the quadrant `H' which was left blank at the time of inoculation did not show any growth.

Hence it was observed that lyso­zyme was present in the: fraction im­mediately next to the slot i.e. fraction 11 which moved towards the cathode side.


  Discussion Top


The fractionation of lacrimal fluid proteins by agar gel electrophoresis has been studied by Francois and Ra­baey (1960) and Tapaszto and Vass (1965). We also carried out the te­chnique of agar gel electrophoresis because of following advantages (i) quantity of solution required is mini­mal and (ii) Protein fractionation is much more detailed than by other techniques.

In our series results of electropho­resis of normal lacrimal fluid revealed five major fractions with a maximum of eight subfractions. This observa­tion agrees with the observations of Brunish (1957) who also obtained five major fractions by filter paper electro­phoresis. Our observations also sup­port the work of Tapaszto and Vass (1965) who demonstrated 8-10 sub­fractions in five major protein groups by means of agar gel electrophoresis. McEwen and Kimura (1955) and Eri­ckson, Berg and Hatlen (1958) ob­tained six fractions in normal human tears by paper electrophoresis. Fran­cois and Rabaey (1960) could demon­strate four major fractions by agar gel electrophoresis.

The electrophoretic analysis showed that normal tears had lysozyme com­ponent which moved towards the Ca­thode as confirmed by lytic activity and was found to be associated with fraction II. This finding agrees with the findings of many other workers who also demonstrated the mobility of lysozyme towards the cathode side. (Smollens, Leopold and Parker, 1949; Migliar and Pirroda 1954; McEwen and Kimura 1955; McEwen, Erickson et al 1959; Krause 1959 and Tapaszto and Vass 1965). Francois and Rabaey (1960), however, identified the lysozyme in the fraction moving towards the anode end. They postu­lated that lysozyme does not migrate normally in agar due to the interac­tion between agar and the enzyme but in our series lysozyme moved nor­mally towards the cathode side per­haps because of temperature difference which was lesser i.e. 4°C and voltage difference i.e. 30 v/cm. instead of 10 v/cm. The duration of current was also more in our series which might have some influence on the mobility.


  Summary and Conclusions Top


A study of electrophoretic analysis of normal human tears and demon­stration of lysozyme was performed utilising the technique: of agar gel electrophoresis.

A total of five major fractions with eight subfractions could be demon­strated in normal human lacrimal fluid.

The mobilities of these fractions were studied and compared with those of serum.

Lysozyme was demonstrated by the lytic activity which was found to be associated with fraction II and moved towards the cathode[15].

 
  References Top

1.
AVASTHY, P. (1964) Antiseptic, 61/2: 127.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
BRUNISH, R. (1956) A. J. 0., 41: 540.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
ERICKSON, O. F. (1956) STANFORD. M. Gull, 14: 124.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
ERICKSON, O. F. (1957) A. J. 0., 43: 295.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
ERICKSON, O. F., BERG, M. and HAL­TEN, R. (1958), A. J. O., 46: 1221.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
FRANCOIS, J. (1959), Arch. Ophth. 61: 351.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
FRANCOIS, J. and RABAEY, M. (1960) A. J. O., 50: 793.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
HENDERSON, J. W. and PROUGH, E. A., Arch. Ophth. 43: 224.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
JOSEPHSON, A. S. and LOCKWOOD, O. W. (1964) J. Immunel, 930: 538.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
JUNNOLA, K. (1953). Ann. Med. Intern Fenn, 31, 1, 100.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
KRAUSE, U. (1959) Ann. Oculist (Paris) 19000: 2.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
McEWEN, W. K. and KIMURA, S. (1965). A. J. O. 39: 200.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
REGAN, E. (1960) A. J. O., 33: 600.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
SMOLLENS, J.; LEOPOLO, J.; PARKER, J. (1949) A. J. O., 32: 153.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
TAPASZTO, I. and VASS, Z. (1965) Acta. Ophth., 43: 796.  Back to cited text no. 15
    


    Figures

  [Figure - 1], [Figure - 2], [Figure - 3]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table - 1]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Introduction
Methods and Mate...
Observations
Discussion
Summary and Conc...
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1417    
    Printed27    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded0    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal