Glyxambi
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 1767
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page


 
   Table of Contents      
ARTICLES
Year : 1972  |  Volume : 20  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 4-10

Pathogenesis and management of bilateral eccentric fixation


Department of Ophtalmology, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India

Correspondence Address:
S.R.K Malik
Department of Ophtalmology, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


PMID: 4668548

Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Malik S, Sen D K, Choudhry S. Pathogenesis and management of bilateral eccentric fixation. Indian J Ophthalmol 1972;20:4-10

How to cite this URL:
Malik S, Sen D K, Choudhry S. Pathogenesis and management of bilateral eccentric fixation. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 1972 [cited 2019 Aug 21];20:4-10. Available from: http://www.ijo.in/text.asp?1972/20/1/4/34674

Table 3

Click here to view
Table 3

Click here to view
Table 2

Click here to view
Table 2

Click here to view
Table 1

Click here to view
Table 1

Click here to view
Amblyopia with eccentric fixa­tion was previously acknowledged to be a unilateral phenomenon, but recently it has been shown to exist bilaterely in several isolated case reports (Dalgleish and Naylor [3] Von Noorden [2] ). and Mackonsen [9] In most of these cases macula was found to be damaged on both the sides. However, Von Noorden [8] des­cribed two cases of bilateral eccen­tric fixation in strabismic amblyopia where no organic macu­lar damage existed in either eye. Hermann and Priestley [5] evaluated and presented 20 such cases. Malik, Ganguli, Sood, and Singh' reported 71 cases of bilateral eccentric fixa­tion and discussed the management of the condition.

The present study has been undertaken to evaluate further the result of the treatment and to discuss the possible etiopatholo­gical factors responsible for bilateral eccentric fixation.


  Method and Materials Top


Cases of squint and amblyopia attending orthoptic and pleoptic clinic of Maulana Azad Medical College and Associated Hospitals, New Delhi are included for this study. Complete orthoptic and pleoptic work-up was done in all cases. Fixation was determined under full mydriasis with projec­toscope by using Linksz star grati­cule which was preferred to the visuscope as even fine movements in the foveal area can be appreciat­ed due to the clear area in the Linksz star. The cases were classified according to Malik Sood, and Choudhry's [6] classification. The fixation pattern of both amblyopic and non-amblyopic eyes was sub­jected to much closer scrutiny and doubtful cases were rejected from the study. Responses to after im­ages and Haidinger Brushes were nated in all cases. Fundus was carefully studied to exclude all those cases having detectable ma­cular pathology. The better eye was given glasses while the worse eye was given Doyne's occulder for 2 weeks before starting the pleop­tic exercises. When the squint was more than 15° it was corrected by surgery first. When the fixation was close to the fovea (erratic or parafoveal) the patient was put straight on Haidenger Brushes. When the fixation was away from the fovea the patient was given after image exercises with the pro­pectoscope and when the fixation shifted to within 3° of fovea pati­ents were asked to attend the exercises in the Haidenger's Brushes. The pleoptic exercises were given to the worse eye once daily. Follow up was done once a week.


  Observations Top


Twelve hundred cases of squint and amblyopia have been investi­gated in this clinic over a period of three and a half years. Out of -these 360 cases (comprising 30%) had eccentric fixation, 242 unilater­al and 118 bilateral. Of the bilateral cases 28 continued to have the pleoptic therapy for a sufficient length of time for the evaluation of the results. Rest of the cases either did not report for the treatment or discontinued the treatment before any conclusion regarding the efficacy of the thera­py could be reached. [Table - 1] shows the age and sex distribution of the cases.The age of the patients rang­ed from 5-45 years but maximum cases were in the first two decades. Female attendance was more as compared to males (65:53).

Analysis of type of fixation has been given in [Table - 2]. Fixation was erratic (ERR) in both the eyes in 46 cases. In rest of the cases the eccentricity of fixation was of smaller degree in one eye.

Out of a total member of 118 cases of squint, 67 were of the con­vergent type and 25 of divergent type.

[Table - 3] shows the relationship with type of refractive error. It is evident that in most of the cases the eye was hypermetropic (92 out of 118). Only in 4 cases the eye was emmetropic. Anisometropia was seen in 86 cases. Out of 28 cases who continued to take pleoptic ex­ercises for sufficient length of time improvement in fixation and/or vision was noted in 19 cases (67.8%)

[Figure - 1],[Figure - 2] display graphically the changes in fixation and visual acuity with pleoptic therapy. It is evident that lesser degrees of eccentric fixation showed better response to treatment as compared to those where the eccentric point lay further away. It also reveals that cases having lesser degrees of amblyopia responded better to pleoptic treatment as compared to those having denser amblyopia. It is interesting to note that in most of the cases showing improvement the better eye also showed some concomitant improvement.


  Discussion and Comment Top


In our study we continue to find a high incidence of this condition (9.8%) in cases of squint and am­blyopia. This agrees well with the observation of Hermann Priestley [5] who commented that in a large series of emblyopes about 10% would show manifest bilateral eccentric fixation and amblyopia which was apparently neither or­ganic nor hysterical. We, therefore, advocate a careful scrutiny of the fixation pattern in both the eyes particularly in the better eye be­fore passing this off as normal. The fact that bilateral eccentric fixa­tion has been found to be more common in convergent squint (56.7% of cases) is related to the greater frequency of occurrence of convergent squint, since approxi­mately 75% of all squint patients have esotropia.

The development of monocular eccentric fixation is not well under­stood but is believed to be due to altered sensorial relationship (Copper [2] ), clinically undetectable organic lesion in the macula (Smukler [11] and Sachsenweger ) or high visual centres (Sachsen wager [10] ). The etiopathogenesis of bilateral eccentric fixation is all the more obscure. It may be that there is no one single factor respon­sible for all the cases. Some cases may be as a result of bilateral poor visual acuity due to damage to central part of visual apparatus and substitution of the directional value of the anatomical foveas of both eyes by eccentric points as suggested by Von Noorden [8] or may be due to damage at a higher level in the visual pathways of orienta­tion and integrating centres as suggested by Akimoto [1] . In none of our cases we could get the history of maternal illness in the antenatal period, nor could we get any his­tory of difficult labour to account for the damage. Though subclinical maternal illness cannot be ruled out, it is not so common as to alone explain such a high incidence of this condition. Hermann and Prist­ley [5] postulated inherent bifoveal instability as an entity to explain bilateral amblyopia with eccentric fixation. He observed that in most of the cases of unilateral amblyo­pia the so called sound eye of the amblyope did not fix in the same way as does the sound of a normal person. They also noted that 20/20 or better vision was rarely reach­ed in the "normal eye" of an uni­lateral amblyope. Our experience in this field, however, has been different. We had not found any abnormality in the pattern of fix­ation in the sound eye of an uni­lateral amblyope. Moreover, the visual acuity was 20/20 or better in the "normal eye" of all the unilateral amblyopic cases.

We, therefore, postulated that most cases of bilateral eccentric fixation result from small haem­orrhages in the macular area which get resolved leaving behind no detectable evidence. Reinal heam­orrhages are reported in 10 to 35% of all children at brith (Duke elder [4] ). Such a heamorrhage in the macular area is bound to depress the central vision. During this period some other point on the retina might become a point par excellence and develop eccentric fixation. It is possible that the so developed eccentric point in in­fancy continues to supress the foveal vision even though the fovea has recovered structurally. When the fovea is stimulated and the eccentric point is depressed it re­sults in elimination of supression of the fovea thereby helping the fixation to become once again cen­tric with recovery of function. We therefore, thought to treating such cases with pleoptic treatment and the effort was quite rewarding. We found noticeable improvement in 19 cases (67.8%). The concomitant improvement in the better eye in most of the cases showing improve­ment in the worse eye is perhaps because occlusion of the worse eye acted as a conventional occlusion for the better eye which incident­ally had only minor degrees of eccentricity Hermann et al [5] sub­jected 12 cases to pleoptic therapy and in 67% cases fixation became centric though significant visual improvement was noted in only 33% of the cases.

Such encouraging results with pleoptic therapy support our hy­pothesis that the original organic lesion recovers structurally but leaves behind only functional de­fect in quite a good number of cases. This functional loss is reco­verable by pleoptic treatment. The cases which did not show any im­provement are the ones where structural damage has been per­manent, though not detectable with the opthalmoscope.

We propose to study the fundi of infants soon after birth to select cases of macular haemorrhages and follow them up for a sufficiently long time to see in what per cen­tage of cases eccentric fixation develops to establish further the authencity of our hypothesis.


  Summary Top


One hundred and eighteen cases of bilateral eccentric fixation in the absence of any detectable macular pathology are presented. The inci­dence has been found to be 9.8% in a series of twelve hundred cases of squint and amblyopia. 28 cases completed the course of pleoptic treatment and of them 19 cases (67.8%) showed improvement in visual acuity or fixation or both.

Encouraging results with pleop­tic treatment lends support to our hypothesis that most of the cases of bilateral eccentric fixation result from small haemorrhages in the macular area in infancy.

 
  References Top

1.
Akimoto, S : Clin. of Ophth. Shipka­wabagh. 18/6, 704 1964.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Coppers, C.: Klin. Mbl., Augenheilk, 18/6, 709. 1956.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Dalgleish, R. and Naylor, E.J.: Bilateral Eccentric fixation with no ocular deviation in a case of Heredo macular degeneration. Brit. J. Ophth.. 47, 11 (1963).  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Duke Eider.: W. S. Text book. Opthal­mology. Vol. IV P. 3839, London. Henry Kimpton. 1949.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Hermann, S.J. and Priestley B. S.: Bifoveal instability : The relationship to strabismic amblyopia. Amer. J. Ophth. 60, 452, 1965.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Malik, S.R.K. Sood, G.C. Ganguli, and Singh. G.: Bilateral eccentric fixation, Brit. J. Ophth. 52:153, 1968.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Malik, S.R.K.; Sood, G. C.; Gupta. A.K.; Choudhry, S.: Management of amblyopia with eccentric fixation, Orient. Arch. Ophth. 6, 149, 1968.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Noorden. G.K. Von : Bilateral eccen­tric fixation, A.M.A. Arch. Ophth. 69: 25. 1963.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Noorden, G. K. Von and Mack onsen, G.: Phenomenology of eccentric fixa­tion. Amer. J. Ophth. 53, 642, 1962.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Sachsenweger R.: Klin. Mbl. Agen. Augen. 147/4, 1965.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Smukler, Amer.: Jour. Ophth. 16, 621, 1933.  Back to cited text no. 11
    


    Figures

  [Figure - 1], [Figure - 2]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table - 1], [Table - 2], [Table - 3]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Method and Materials
Observations
Discussion and C...
Summary
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1902    
    Printed26    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded0    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal