Glyxambi
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 1305
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

   Table of Contents      
ARTICLES
Year : 1974  |  Volume : 22  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 29-30

Rhinosporidiosis of lacrimal sac


1 Reader in Ophthalmology, Ravinder Nath Tagore Medical College, Udaipur, India
2 General hospital, Jhunjhunu (Rajastan), India

Correspondence Address:
M R Jain
Reader in Ophthalmology, Ravinder Nath Tagore Medical College, Udaipur
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


PMID: 4465292

Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Jain M R, Sahai R. Rhinosporidiosis of lacrimal sac. Indian J Ophthalmol 1974;22:29-30

How to cite this URL:
Jain M R, Sahai R. Rhinosporidiosis of lacrimal sac. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 1974 [cited 2019 Dec 14];22:29-30. Available from: http://www.ijo.in/text.asp?1974/22/3/29/31357

Rhinosporidiosis is a fungal infection caused by Rhinosporidium Seeberi, first des­cribed by Seeber. [2],[8] in It is common in India and Ceylon, [4],[5],[7],[9] but is extremely rare elsewhere. [1],[2] The disease is rare in females. [1],[2] The mode of infection and its transmission is still unknown, but it is thought to be a water born infection. [2],[3] Ocular rhinosporidiosis in India affects conjunctiva (69%), lacrimal sac (24%), canaliculi (4%), lids and sclera (4%).


  Case Report Top


A 5-year male child was admitted to the eye ward with the complaint of gradually increasing painless swelling just underneath the skin, on the right lateral side of the bridge of the nose, for last one year [Figure - 1]. Subsequently the swelling started growing rapidly. There was no history of any epistaxis or epiphora.

Parents are agriculturists. No other history was of any significance.

Investigations were non contributory. Syringing of the right sac showed that the passage was partially patent.

Treatment : Medical treatment comprising of anti­biotics and steroids led to no improvement. As growth was involving the lacrimal sac, the sac and growth were excised. Bleeding was little more than usual.

Post operative period was uneventful and the patient was discharged on 10th day.

Histopathology: Serial sections through the excised mass confirmed the diagnosis of rhinosporidiosis of the lacrimal sac. Numerous sporocysts in various stages of maturation were seen just underneath the stratified squamous epithelium of the lacrimal sac. Sporocysts are doubly contoured structures with a inner cellulose and outer chitinous layer. The mature sporocysts are termed 'Sporongia'. [Figure - 2]a & b.

One of the sporongia ruptured releasing nume­rous spores in the stroma. Around the spores, stroma showed infiltration with chronic inflammatory cells, consisting of lymphocytes and few plasma cells. [Figure - 3].


  Discussions Top


Soft, painless and fluctuating swelling with complete or incomplete blockage of naso­lacrimal duct and epistaxis have been described as cardinal clinical features [7] for the diagnosis of rhinosporidiosis of lacrimal sac. The case described had characteristic features except nasal bleeding which probably was absent due to comparatively recent onset of the swelling. Histopathological features of stratified squa­mous epithelium of lacrimal sac wall having sporocysts in various stages of development confirmed the diagnosis. Recurrences reported as quite frequent, has, however, not been observed in our case till date.


  Summary Top


Lacrimal sac rhinosporidiosis in a male child of 5-years of age belonging to the agri­cultural community of India has been reported.

 
  References Top

1.
Boyd, William 1967, Text book of Pathology, Lea & Febiger Philadelphia, 328.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Duke Elder, S., 1952, Text book of Ophthal­mology, Vol. V, p. 5340, Henry Kimpton, London.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Duke Elder, S. 1965 System of Ophthalmology, Vo. VIII, p. 391, Henry Kimpton, London.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Karunaratne, 1936, J. Path. Bact., 82, 193.   Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Kirkpatrik 1916, Opthalmoscope, 477.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Kuriakose, E.T., 1963, Brit, J. Ophthal., 47, 346.   Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Rambo, V.C., 1949, Proc. Indian Ophthal, Soc., 10, 72.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Seeber, (1900), Un neuvo esporozoaria parasite del hombre (Thesis) Buenss Aires. Cited from System of Ophthalmology, Vol. VIII, p. 391. Henry Kimpton, London, 1965.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Wright, (1922), Ind. Med. Gaz., 567, 81.  Back to cited text no. 9
    


    Figures

  [Figure - 1], [Figure - 2], [Figure - 3]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Case Report
Discussions
Summary
References
Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1864    
    Printed39    
    Emailed2    
    PDF Downloaded0    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal