Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 3597
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

   Table of Contents      
ARTICLES
Year : 1977  |  Volume : 25  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 24-27

Orbital cysticercosis


A.M.U. Institute of Ophthalmology, Aligarh, India

Correspondence Address:
K Nath
A. M. U. Institute of Ophthalmology, Aligarh, (U.P.)
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


PMID: 612587

Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Nath K, Gogi R, Krishna G. Orbital cysticercosis. Indian J Ophthalmol 1977;25:24-7

How to cite this URL:
Nath K, Gogi R, Krishna G. Orbital cysticercosis. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 1977 [cited 2020 Mar 28];25:24-7. Available from: http://www.ijo.in/text.asp?1977/25/1/24/34596

Table 1

Click here to view
Table 1

Click here to view
One of the most important parasites which frequently causes blindness in human is the larvel form of Taenia solium or pork tapeworm called cysticercus cellulosae. Ocular cysticer­cus is a rare disease and is known since the times of Hippocrates, Aristophanes and Aristo­tile. [12]

Cysticercus cellulosae is bladder worm stage of Taenia solium. It is characterized by scolex with its stickers and crown hooks. Human in­fection may occur on taking raw infected pork containing visible cysticercus cellulosae-`Mea­shy-pork', food or water contaminated with faecal matter containing ova or an autoinfec­tion. [34] The ovum reaches the stomach, develops into an embryo which make its way into circu­lation and lodges in various organs of the body.

Since the first case report by Sommering [32] , a number of reports have been published. [10],[11],[12],[18],[31],[37],[38],[39] From India cysticercus infection in the eye has been reported by various workers. [1],[2],[3],[4],[5],[6],[7],[8],[9],[10],[11],[12],[13],[15],[16],[17],[18],[19],[20],[21],[22],[23],[24],[25],[26],[27],[28],[29],[30],[31],[32],[33],[36],[40]. The subretinal space seems to be favourite site for this parasite followed by sub conjuctival tissues [Table - 1]. Orbit is a rare site for cysticercus cellulosae. There are 24 such cases on records [Table - 1], and we docu­ment another such case in a Hindu vegetarian female.


  Case Report Top


A Hindu 14 year old vegetarian Jain female patient resident of Agra, reported to eye out patient depart­ment of A. M. U. Institute of Ophthalmology, Aligarh with the complaint of ptosis left upper lid for 18 months. Twenty days later she developed pain in the orbit and eye started buidging forward gradually and attained this protrusion. There was no history of dip­lopid. On examination of left eye, the visual acuity was 6/6. The proptosis was forwards (6mm), downwards (8 mm), and outwards (2 mm), The intraorbital pressure was raised. On digital palpation it was not tender and no palpable mass was found. The amount of ptosis was 5 mm in forward gaze. The action of levator was weak. Ocular movements were restricted on direct elevation and dextruelevation, There was light congestion of fornices and the fundus showed blurred hyperaemic disc with tortuouous blood vessels as compared to right eye fundus The right eye was normal.

On the laboratory investigations the E.S.R, was raised to 56 mm, TLC was 7,2001cu mm with 16% eosinophils. Repeated microscopic examination of stools by direct and concentration methods did not reveral any evidence of parasitic infection. V.D.R.L., and Maun­tox's tests were negative: Radiographic examination of the skull and orbit did not show anything positive.

Lateral cum anterior orbitotomy was done. Growth was palpated on medial side and under the roof of the orbit. While dissecting the fibrous covering of the growth suddenly cream colour pus came out of it, this was followed by extrusion of a cystic translucent mass. The cavity was scraped and filled with streptopencillin powder and wound was stitched in layers.

On gross examination, the cyst was oval and measu­red 1.0 X 0.5 cm, with translucent walls and a white opaque dot like area at one point which indicated the position of scolex [Figure - 1]. On histological examination the presence of body canal lined by epithelium confirmed the diagnosis [Figure - 2].

Hence on the basis of gross and microscopic exami­nation, the diagnosis of cysticercus cellulose of the orbit was established.


  Comments Top


In the present case clinically it was not pos­sible to pinpoint the exact diagnosis. It was only at the time of operation when cysticercus infection was suspected and was confirmed later on by histopathological examnation. Presence of increased number of eosinophils in the blood could only indicate the diagnosis. In suspected cases complement fixation test can be of some value. [31] In 50% of cases Casoni test may be positive. [14]

Taenia solium is reported to be more com­mon in younger age group. [10],[12],[15] Involve­ment of the left eye in the present case and as explained by other workers [13],[24] can have ana­tomical reasons for this predilection, as the left common carotid artery arises directly from the arch of aorta and disseminates the parasites more towards left eye. Inside the orbit, the orbital lesion was localized on the nasal side, which may be due to the course of ophthalmic artery which after giving off lacrimal branches runs along the medial side of the orbit and divides into its terminal branches. [13] Ptosis may be due to extension of the cyst in to the levator causing mechanical restriction of its action.

Cysticercus cellulosae is common in the pork eaters, whereas the present case belongs to rigid vegetarian Jain family. It is possible that pa­tient might have had this infection following ingestion of infected food or water.


  Summary Top


A case of orbital cysticercus in a Hindu Jain vegetarian female has been reported. It was present on medial side of the left orbit. Diagnosis was made only at the time of operation and was confirmed histopathologi­cally.

 
  References Top

1.
Angra, S. K. and Mohan, M., 1970, Orient. Arch. Ophthal., 8, 301.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Ahluwalia, B. K., Chandra, P., Gupta, N. C. and Singh, 1. 1974, East. Arch. Ophthal, 2, 47.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Balkrishnan. E., 1961, Brit. Jour. Ophthal, 45, 150.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Chadha, A. C., 1962, Amer. Jour. Ophthal., 53, 529.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Dayal, Y., Sood, N. N. Goswamy, V. and Angra, S. K., 1970, Orient. Arch. Ophthal., 8, 212.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Desai, N. C., Sharma, G. K., and Chandak, G. K., 1972, Orient. Arch. Ophthal., 10, 39.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Eliot, R. H. and Ingram, A. C., 1911, Indian Med. Gaz. 43, 215.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Gahlot, D. K., Khosla, P. K. and Prakash, P., 1974, East. Arch. Ophthal., 2, 68.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Gupta, A. N. and Mathur. S. N., 1967, Orient Arch. Ophthal., 5, 115.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Larmande. A., 1962, XIX Concilium Ophthalmo­logicum, 1962, India Acta., 1, 186.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Laignier-Terrasse, P., 1932, cited by Duke Elder. S., 1945, Text hook of ophthalmology, vol III, p. 3439. Kimpton. London.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Lech. J. 1949, Amer. Jour. Ophthal., 32, 523.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Malik, S.R.K., Gupta, A- K. and Chaudhari, S. K., 1968, Amer. Jour. Ophthal. 66, 1168.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Manson, Bahar, P. M , 1954, Manson's Tropical Disease. p. 817., Cassel and Co., London. 14th ed.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Mathur, R. N. and Abraham, L., 1962, Arch. Ophthal. 67, 562.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Mehrotra, S. K. and Sofat, B. K., 1975, Ind. Jour. Ophthal, 23, 39.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Mehra, K. S., Nema, H. V., Nagarajachar, J., Rajyashree, K. and Rahi, A. H. 1968, Acta. Ophthal., 46, 980.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Michail, D., 1935, Ann. d'ocil., 172, 385.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Mukherjee, P. K. and Agrawal, S., 1975, Ind. Jour. Ophthal. 23, 28.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Nirankari, M. S., Chadha, M. R. and Khanna, K. K., 1969, Orient. Arch. Opthal., 7,28.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Patoria. N. K. and Junncukar. R. V., 1967, Ind. Jour. Ophthal 14,227.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Prakash. P., Dayal, Y., and Sood, N. N. 1972, Ortent. Arch. Ophthal., 10, 202.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Puttanna, S. T., 1962, XIX Concilium Ophthalmologicum, 1962, India Acta., 1, 405.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Rao, A. U. N., Satyandra, O. M. and Sood, N. N. 1967. Orient. Arch. Ophthal., 15, 249.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Ramalinigam, T. T., 1962. XIX Concilium Ophthalmologicum, 1962. India Acta., 1. 410.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Reddy, P. S. 1960, Proc. All India Ophthal. Soc., 17,219.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Reddy, P. S, and Satyandran, O. M.. 1964. Amer. Jour. Ophthal, 57, 664,  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Reddy, M. V.. Satycndran. O. M. and Siva Ram­ Krishna, K., 1970. .Acta. Ophthal, 48,321,  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Sen, D. K., 1968, Orient. Arch. Ophthal., 1,181,   Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Sen, D. K., Maihur, R. N. and Thomas. A. 1967, Brit. Jour. Ophthal., 51,630.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Soomsawasdi, B.,Romayanonda, N. and Kancha­nararya, D., 1963, Orient. Arch. Ophthal., 1, 153.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Sommering. 1830, Oken's Iseis, 8,717.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Sood, N. N., Shukla, K. N., Lamba, P. and Madhaven. M.. 1970, Orient. Arch. Ophthal., 8,201.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
SaNatz, W. G., 1956. Medical Parasitology, p127 Me Graw Hill, New York.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Thomas, A. and Abraham. J. C., 1968, Orient. Arch. Ophthal., 6,308.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Tarpore, R., Swamy, T. V. and Datta, B. B.. 1957 Jour. All. India Oplithal., Soc., 5, 72.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Toulant. P., 1939, Traite. Ophthal., 8, 717.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Von-Graefe., 1866, Arch. L, C. Ophthal., 12, 174.   Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.
Vosgien., 1911, These de paris,  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.
Wright. R. C.. 1925, Report of Govt. Ophth. Hosp., Madras.  Back to cited text no. 40
    


    Figures

  [Figure - 1], [Figure - 2]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table - 1]


This article has been cited by
1 Unusual presentation of orbital cysticercosis-ptosis, diminution of vision and medial rectus weakness: A case report
Taksande, B., Jajoo, U., Yelwatkar, S., Ashish, J.
Cases Journal. 2009; 2(8): art-7025
[Pubmed]
2 Disseminated cysticercosis with multiple bilateral orbital cysts
Pushker, N., Mehta, M., Meel, R., Bajaj, M.S.
Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2009; 25(6): 499-501
[Pubmed]
3 Radiological quiz - Orbit
Sethi, S.K., Hemal, U., Solanki, R.S., Bhagra, A.
Indian Journal of Radiology and Imaging. 2004; 14(1): 93-94
[Pubmed]
4 Orbital and adnexal cysticercosis
Pushker, N., Bajaj, M.S., Betharia, S.M.
Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology. 2002; 30(5): 322-333
[Pubmed]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Case Report
Comments
Summary
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2742    
    Printed33    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded0    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 4    

Recommend this journal