Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 4383
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

   Table of Contents      
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 1983  |  Volume : 31  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 439-441

Trauma index-a system of evaluation of ocular damage due to trauma


Department of Ophthalmology G.R. Medical College, Gwalior, India

Correspondence Address:
B Shukla
Department of Ophthalmology G.R. Medical College, Gwalior
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


PMID: 6677606

Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Shukla B, Khanna B. Trauma index-a system of evaluation of ocular damage due to trauma. Indian J Ophthalmol 1983;31:439-41

How to cite this URL:
Shukla B, Khanna B. Trauma index-a system of evaluation of ocular damage due to trauma. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 1983 [cited 2020 Feb 18];31:439-41. Available from: http://www.ijo.in/text.asp?1983/31/4/439/27574

Table 3

Click here to view
Table 3

Click here to view
Table 2

Click here to view
Table 2

Click here to view
Table 1

Click here to view
Table 1

Click here to view
Ocular injuries are very common and are of great variety and complexity. Besides structural and functional loss they have social, occupational and medico-legal implications. Eye ball and its adnexa is a closely linked congregation of many delicate tissues which are affected in a variety of ways to various degrees. Hence it is by no means easy to make an over all assessment of a given case of ocular trauma. Time factor adds to further complexities. In most cases maximum damage occurs at the time of trauma which tends to return to normal with variable rate for vari­able period of time. However in some cases the effects have a late onset and need a long follow up.

Basically the magnitude of trauma depends on the structural and functional loss it induces. This loss has to be weighed against the time factor which implies approximate recovery time if at all. Based on these conceptions a formula for over all assessment of ocular injury has been worked out and is named Trauma Index.

Trauma Index (T.I.;= 1/2 (S/2 + F) x T/ 100

S - stands for structural loss and is graded as mild (25%), moderate (50%) and marked (100%). Marked loss includes cases of large scleral or corneo-scleral tears, total anterior staphyloma, phthisis bulbi, multiple fractures leading to gross displacement of the globe. Moderate loss included dense corneal and lenticular opacities, ptosis or lagophthalmos, squint, marked subconjunctival haemorrhages and hyphaema and acute inflammations. Mild loss included slight corneal and lenticular opacities, scar or notching of lids, slight con­gestion, swelling, haemorrhage etc. One can not have water tight compartment in this grading and the judgement of the clinician is important.

F - stands for functional loss and is graded from 0 the 100% depending on the visual acuity (6/6 to No P.L.). The vision has been graded on percentage basis and the following table has been slightly modified from that given by Dhanda and Kalevar.[2]



As is evident loss upto 6/60 is graded in steps of 10 and beyond that in steps of 5. This table is based on the presumption that pre-trauma vision was 6/6 which is perhaps true in most cases of young patients. However if the initial vision was low the difference from pre-trauma vision to post-trauma vision was taken for calculation where ever possible.

Although the structure and function of the eye are almost equally important but from the economical, occupational and medico­legal point of view the loss of function has much greater significance than the loss of structure alone. Hence in evaluation of trauma the structural loss has been halved in calcula­tion.

In the formula for Trauma Index T stands for the time factor which indicates approxi­mate time for recovery. It has been graded on percentage basis in the following table :­


  Observations Top


500 cases of eye injuries were studied at J.A. Hospital, Gwalior during the last 21/2 years (1.1.1979 to 30.6.1982). Besides detailed history, thorough clinical examination and pertinent investigations Trauma Index was calculated in each case by the formula men­tioned earlier i.e. T.I. 1/2 (S/2 + ) x T/100

To simplify the evaluation further the ocular injuries were classified in three grade, depending on the Trauma Index as follows: -

Thus ocular injuries can be classified a: mild, moderate or severe based on quantitative estimation rather than on pure clinical assessment.


  Discussion Top


Although many authors have anlaysed eases of ocular injuries[1],[2],[3] there has been little effort so far to evaluate a given case of ocular trauma in a comprehensive way. Pritikin[4] has mentioned an elaborate formula to estimate visual loss for compensation as practiced in the United States. Bhatt[5] has graded them on the basis of visual loss.

We have made an affort to assess each case on the basis of structural loss and func­tion loss in relation to time, and called it Trauma Index. While making calculations both the eyes are considered separately and adequate weightage is given to bilateral cases.

As evident from [Table - 3], out of 500 cases 187 (37%) had Trauma Index upto 10 only indicating that a great majority of injurses are mild and recover in short time. However 23.4% cases had Trauma Index over 50 indi­cating grave damage with poor recovery. At present at many places compensation in industrial injuries is given on a gross assess­ment of vision. Calculation of Trauma Index will provide a fairly accurate estimation of loss of structure and function and the quan­tum of compensation can be directly pro­portional to Trauma Index which would be more fare to employer and employee alike.

Similarly in medico-legal cased classifica­tion in terms of simple or grievous injury is not adequate. Trauma Index will provide the exact damage occured and claims can be made on more specific grounds and better justice can be delivered.

We have only tried to introduce this con­cept which has many potentialities. For ex­ample it could be worked out in relation to age, sex, occupation, nature and type of injury which would yield useful information and would help us to formulate ruo strategy for the prevention of ocular trauma.


  Acknowledgement Top


We wish to thank Prof. S P. Srivastava and all the members of the Eye Department, J.A. Hospital, Gwalior for their help and encouragement.

 
  References Top

1.
Malik, S.R.K. et al, 1968,: J. All Ind. Ophthal­mol. Soc., 16:178.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Shukla, LM. and Venna, E.N., 1979, Ind. J. Ophthalmol, 1:93.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Sofat, B.K.:1973 East. Arch. Ophthalmol, 6 : 391.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Pritikin R.T., 1968, J. All Ind, Ophthalmol. Soc, 16:240.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Bhatt, M.K., 1978, Study of pattern of ccular injuries. Thesis for M.S. Ophthal., Jiwaji Univ.  Back to cited text no. 5
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table - 1], [Table - 2], [Table - 3]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Observations
Discussion
Acknowledgement
References
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2535    
    Printed75    
    Emailed3    
    PDF Downloaded0    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal