Glyxambi
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 2309
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page


 
   Table of Contents      
ARTICLES
Year : 1983  |  Volume : 31  |  Issue : 5  |  Page : 502-504

Make your own disposable stainless steel blade


1 Department of Ophthalmology, Medical College, Amritsar, India
2 Holland
3 USA

Correspondence Address:
Daljit Singh
Department of Ophthalmology, Medical College, Amritsar, (Punjab)
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


PMID: 6671744

Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Singh D, Worst J, Roy H. Make your own disposable stainless steel blade. Indian J Ophthalmol 1983;31:502-4

How to cite this URL:
Singh D, Worst J, Roy H. Make your own disposable stainless steel blade. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 1983 [cited 2019 Aug 21];31:502-4. Available from: http://www.ijo.in/text.asp?1983/31/5/502/29531

A number of ophthalmologists in developed and developing countries are using breakable razorblade pieces for eye surgery. Blue Gillets and many other good varieties of breakable blades are a dwindling species and are difficult to find. The world wide popularity of cheap, good quality stainless steel blades makes it inevitable that breakable blades will be extinct in the near future.

The Advantages and Disadvantages of Breakable Blades

The making of a razor blade fragment is very easy. The blade is broken into two halves, inside its paper wraping. Slivers are made by twisting the blade with a blade breaker or with a well-closing needle holder. Sufficiently long slivers are made for an optimum grasp. Not every razor fragment thus made is of good quality, so that many of them have to be discarded after making a trial on the eye. If the razor fragments are kept in the open, or sterilised in spirit or boiling water, their points seem to loose some of their sharpness. This is due to inherent weakness of their point and rust formation. To get a fair degree of sharp­ness, the razor fragments are to be freshly prepared and quickly sterilised. For some unknown reasons, there are days when most razor fragments are sharp and good, while on other days a large number of blunt-pointed, blades may spoil the mood of the surgeon.

Alternate developments

A number of firms in the West have come out with custom-made uniform quality, pre­sterilised, "Use and throw away" blades. Such blades are generally rust-prone, like the breakable razor blades.

One of the authors (J.W.) introduced Super­blade' in 1977. It is made from stainless steel blades with highly sophisticated technology. They are available in sterile packs and are popular in the affluent West. Even though the blade is reusable after re-sterilisation, few surgeons in the West would take that trouble.

A third development has been the making of a Diamond knife which is so costly that most surgeons would hesitate to buy one. The cost is around one thousand U.S. dollars. The cutting quality of Super-blades' and diamond knife are so great that there is hardly any sensation of touch or pressure and the incision has to be guided by sight. Slightest mishandling will lead to the loss of knife-point.

Stainless steel blade making

One of the authors (J. W) has been experimenting with the use of a shearing rose­ cutter for cutting stainless steel blade slivers. This procedure tended to curl the sharp point of blade-sliver. The curled point could then be finished by carefully tapping between a convex jeweller's hammer and a polished jeweller anvil to provide an excellent working blade. Recently, however, one of the authors (D.S.) has simplified the preservation of blade-tip by simply wrapping the blade with cello tape prior to cutting with a rose-cutter. This utter simpli­fication of the process has thus brought stainless steel knife-making within the reach of every ophthalmologist.


  Materials Needed Top


[Figure - 1]

1, A good quality shearing rose-cutter or a shear.

2, A good quality stainless steel shaving blade.

3, Cellotape role 2.5 cm wide.


  Method Top


1, Cut the razor blade length wise into two parts.

2, Stick one-half of the razor blade on an appropriate length of cello tape.

3, Role the cello tape over the edge of blade and stick it firmly [Figure - 2].

4, Cut fragments with the rose-cutter, The angle of cut should be between 25 and 45 degrees. The cut fragment will remain attached to the cello tape [Figure - 3].

5, The cello tape containing the knives may be stuck to a card board for storage and transport or even posting. Sterilisation procedures

The stainless steel razor fragment prepared 'as' above can be sterilised by any of following; means:

1) Acetone Sterilisation

Pure acetone is used for this purpose. Some cellotapes do not dissolve in acetate. If that is the case the tape should be peeled off with small forceps before sterilisation. Great Care should be taken to avoid even slightest touch to the tip of the blade:

(a) A small dish containing a pad of cotton is filled with acetone. Either individual bald,- fragments or the whole pack contained within the Sellotape covering is dipped in acetone for about 5 minutes. The cello tape covering is `dissolved and sterilised blade fragments are left on the cotton pad.

(b) Alternately, an individual razor fragment within the cello tape covering is held by 'a blade holder and this instrument is kept in the acetone. As soon as cello tape is dissolved the instrument is ready for use.

The use of cotton pad in (a) and pre-fixation with razor blade holder in (b) assures that' the razor blade is not damaged in handling.

2) Dry Heat Sterilisation

Before dry heat sterilisation, the cello tape covering should be peeled off with fine forceps. A dip in the boiling water makes cello tape. thick and its peeling off becomes easier, A temperature of 160° C for five minutes is sufficient for dry heat sterilisation of razor blades.

Stainless steel blade vs. breakable blades

The practical stainless steel blades as described above are far superior to the break­able blades for two reasons:

1. Stainless steel blades are almost 50 thinner than the breakable blades.

2. The stainless bevel at the edges is almost two times wider than the bevel of breakable blades.

In actual use the practical stainless steel slivers come equal to Super-blades R. A well made blade will need no effort to cut through scleral or cornea. [Figure - 4] shows the tips of Supe-blade and practical stainless steel blade as described above as seen under polarised microscope at magnification X 300.

Cost

One stainless steel razor blade can provide roughly 10-12 knives (slivers). Each sliver need to be used only once. Thus the cost per surgery for a sharp ocular knife will be infinitely small.


  Summary Top


A practical method for making stainless steel razor blades for eye surgery is described. This method provides a sharp, inexpensive and readily available ocular knife. Two easy methods of sterilisation are described.


    Figures

  [Figure - 1], [Figure - 2], [Figure - 3], [Figure - 4]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Materials Needed
Method
Summary
Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1843    
    Printed25    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded0    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal