Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 9266
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

   Table of Contents      
ARTICLES
Year : 1983  |  Volume : 31  |  Issue : 7  |  Page : 941-946

Posterior lensectomy-a study of 193 eyes


Arvind Eye Hospital, Madurai, India

Correspondence Address:
A T Rangwala
Arvind Eye Hospital, Madurai
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


PMID: 6544293

Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Rangwala A T, Namperumalsamy P. Posterior lensectomy-a study of 193 eyes. Indian J Ophthalmol 1983;31, Suppl S1:941-6

How to cite this URL:
Rangwala A T, Namperumalsamy P. Posterior lensectomy-a study of 193 eyes. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 1983 [cited 2020 May 26];31, Suppl S1:941-6. Available from: http://www.ijo.in/text.asp?1983/31/7/941/29712

Table 5

Click here to view
Table 5

Click here to view
Table 4

Click here to view
Table 4

Click here to view
Table 3

Click here to view
Table 3

Click here to view
Table 2

Click here to view
Table 2

Click here to view
Table 1

Click here to view
Table 1

Click here to view
Conventional cataract surgery for varieties of cataracts like congenital, developmental, traumatic, complicated etc. and for displaced lenses has many operative and post-operative complications like vitreous loss[1],[2],[3] vitreous incarceration in wound, retained lens matter[4], corneal oedema[5], hyphema, shallow anterior chamber[1], iridocyclitis[4], after-cataract[4], epithelial ingrowth[6],[7], sub secondary glaucoma with bullous keratopathy and retinal detachment[8],[9].

sub Phacoemulsification besides having its own merits has some disadvantages, viz. inability to deal with operative complications like vitreous distrubances which may

accidentally occur in 3 to 22% of eyes[10],[11],[12],[13],[14], posterior dislocation of nucleus[15], late opacification of posterior capsule[16] etc.

Employing the technique for pars plana vitrectomy, Peyman[17] as well as Machemer[18],

sub conceived a new approach to lens removal through pars plana with very good success. We have, at Arvind Eye Hospital, done so far 193 lensectomies using Peyman's vitreo­phage.


  MATERIAL & METHODS Top


The various indications for our series of 193 lensectomies were as follows. These cases were from our Out-Patient Department as well as many were referrals.

Patient Selection and Evaluation

-A careful preoperative examination is an indispensible pre-requisite before taking up a case for lensectomy.

The criteria to be met with are

1. Age-upto the age of 16 years, nucleus is not "formed" and hence lens is expected to be soft. However, we have successfully done lensectomy even up to 35 years if next conditions are fulfilled even at this advan­ced age.

2. Slit-lamp examination­

a) Nucleus-It must be soft enough to be bulged into the suction port of vit­reophage and cut by the blade. Scler­osis upto 2+ (on a scale of 4+) is permissible[19].

0 = Clear nucleus

1+=Nucleus slightly hazy 2+=Beginning brown or gray cobra

tion; no opacity in retroillumination 3+= Definite brown or gray coloration,

slight opacity in retroillumination

4+=Dark brown nucleus, definite

opacity on retroillumination.

b) Cortex and Capsule-If these are calcified and memberanous, the case is excluded for same reasons.

c) Anterior segment examination-to assess the status of vitreous, synechiae etc.

3. Fundus Examination-by indirect ophtha­Imoscopy was done as far -as possible to rule out incurable fundus pathology.

4. Ultrasonography-to assess fund _ us status in eyes with total lens opacity.

5. On operating table-If knife passed through sclerotomy to lens cannot pierce the nucleus easily but pushes the nucleus forwards or sideways, nucleus is too hard for lensectomy. Here we resorted to con­ventional surgery.

Surgical Technique:

Majority of patients were operated upon under local anaesthesia, exceptions were children and apprehensive persons. All len­sectomies were done with Peyman's vit­reophage utilizing guillotine cutting action and operator's finger regulated suction through pars plana apperad.

After adequate exposure, a limbal peri­tomy was made at 10.30 position. A 4 mm cir­cumferential incision for sclerotomy was made with no.64 Beaver's blade 2.5 mm away from limbus for children upto 10 years of age, 3 to 3.5 mm for young adolescents and 4 to 4.5 mm for adults. (Underlying ciliary body was cauterized well to avoid bleeding). A mattress suture of 5-0 vicryl was passed in sclerotomy lips. A no. 52M Beaver's knife was inserted through sclerotomy anteriorly so as to enter the lens equator. This avoids the injury to base of the vitreous.

After withdrawing the knife, vitreophage was introduced through same tunnel to lens. Preplaced mattress suture was tightened fir­mly to make sclerotomy leak-proof. Lensec­tomy began with nucleus first, then cortex and then lastly anterior and posterior capsules were cut and removed. The direction of cut­ting port was always kept anteriorly: Some amount of anterior vitrectomy invariably accompanied posterior capsulectomy. Peripheral capsule and base of vitreous were carefully avoided. An attempt was always made to maintain a round pupil but when necessary iridectomy was easily done.

Follow-up

Our follow-up duration of 193 lensec­tomies extends as follows

Upto 6 months 56 eyes

6-12 months 38 eyes

12-24 months 28 eyes

122 eyes

Follow-up not advised due

to incurable fundus pathology 25 eyes

Non-follow up 46 eyes

193 eyes


  Observations and discussions Top


We have assessed our visual improvem­ents as per modified Peyman and Sanders classification 20. Visual acuty was divided into four levels.

l+ 2+ 3+ 4+

Level I-PL, HM, CF, 1/60

Level 11-2/60 to 5/60

Level 111-6/60 to 6/24

Level-IV-6/18 to 6/6

Visual gain was assessed in scale of 4+

1+-if vision improved in same level

2 2a-if vision improved to next better level

3+-if vision improved by two levels

4+-if vision improved from level I to IV

Visual improvement was assessed as per vision at latest visit by the patient. Visual acuity could not be assessed in some patients because of young age or mental retardation. However in such cases anatomical success was established by creating a clear pupillary area and clear media with normal fundus. Final visual gain depended more on the status of fundus rather than clarity of anterior seg­ment which was achieved in almost all cases, (vide infra). Unimproved vision was either a result of incurable and unrelated fundus pathology, inoperable retinal detachment or amblyopia, not detected preoperatively.

For visual evaluation we should consider only 154 eyes (excluding 39 eyes with unasessed vision from total 193 eyes operated). Thus it is evident that:

1) 116 eyes (75.3%) had gained visually, 92 (59.7%) improving remarkable (3" or 4 ).

2) In congenital and developmental cataract group, 27 eyes (60%) had very good improvement while 9 eyes (20%) improved by 2 -.

3) In traumatic ataract group, 36 eyes (66.6%) gained 3+ or 4+ vision.

4) Results were still better in steroid cataracts and early senile cataracts where all gained 4+ vision improvement.

5) Complicated cataracts and displaced len­ses did not do as well as other groups,, but still results are fairly good when their aetiologies are considered. Nearly 50% patients had 3+ or 4+ improvement.

Complications -

Various complications encountered were as in [Table - 3].

Common anterior segment complications were corneal oedema, -sub iridocyclitis, secondary glaucoma and hyphema. However, incidence of these was much less (11 eyes, 5.6%). Most of these were in traumatic cataract group where any surgery understandably carries higher risks.

Another very important aspect of lensectomy is total avoidance of shallow or flat anterior chamber owing to basic features of surgery. Flat chamber is a major contributory factor for defective post-operative vision. Incidence of this complication is estimated upto 4% in needling and aspiration techni­ques[5]. Similarly incidence of after-cataract is very low(5 eyes, 2.5%) as compared to estimated 23% eyes developing this after conventional surgery for congenital cataracts.

It will be interesting to analyse cases of retinal detachments.

table depicts that

1) Out of 30, 21 eyes (70%) were detected to have retinal detachment on table. Majority of these belonged to traumatic or complicated groups and could not be diagnosed preoperatively and hence can not be considered a complication of lensectomy procedure per se. Of late however we have been able to avoid doing surgery in such cases by doing a preoperative ultrasonography.

2) In congenital and developmental cataract group, we have not encountered any detached retina so far. The relevant incidence in literature is 2% 8.

3) In traumatic, complicated and dislocated cataracts incidence of post-operative detachment of retina was 4.5% (9 eyes). However, traction band of vitreous to sclerotomy site was not detected in any of these cases. Hence it is safe to assume that these detachments were due to basic pathology of these diseased eyes and not due to lensectomy procedure itself.

4) In steroid and early `Senile' cataracts, no case has developed a retinal detachment in followup period.

The various types of post-operative retinal detachments were as follows

Another important point to consider is that lens nucleus was dislocated in only two patients, first in 53 year old diabetic man when lensectomy had to be unwillingly done while doing vitrectomy and second in 45 year old man with traumatic subluxation. Nucleus could not be removed with vitrophage. While on the other hand in early `senile' cataracts we could successfully do lensectomy even upto 35 years of age since these lenses were found to be `soft' on table. This once again stresses careful selection of patients as outlined.

Advantages of Lensectomy

I. Congenital and Developmental Cataracts­Advantages over conventional needling and aspiration are:

1) Lens is removed in toto (except most peripheral part). So incidence of after­cataract is much less.

2) Repeated surgeries are avoided.

3) Since some amount of anterior vitrec­tomy is invariably done, chances of vit­reous disturbances like prolapse, loss, traction, incarceration in the wound are avoided. The incidence of these complications in needling is estimated as 8 to 12%[2],[3].One should always remember that vitreous base is not disturbed.

4) Corneal endothelium is not damaged.

II. Traumatic and Complicated Cataracts­Many of these eyes are complicated by the presence of firm synechiae, capsule rem­nants, vitreous prolapse, and other vit­reous pathology. Lensectomy combined with iridectomy,at synechiae points and vitrectomy offers better treatment with relatively much less anterior segment complications than conventional surgery with its attendant risks like iridocyclitis, hyphema, vitreous loss and traction on retina. Thus lensectomy provides

1 . A clear central optical axis and hence better vision prospects.

2. A clean, one-time procedure.

3. Although long term followup extend­ing over two decades is needed, it hopefully reduces incidence of post­ operative retinal detachment due to its inherent merits discussed above.


  Summary Top


193 lensectomies were done through pars plana approach for different causes like con­genital, traumatic, complicated, early "senile" cataracts and displaced lenses using Peyman's vitreophage. Good visual results have been obtained in 70% to 50% of patients, depending upon basic aetiology. Incidence of complications is low and authors forEsee an appreciable decrease in post-operative retinal detachments when compared to conservative surgery for the same type of cataract. Advan­tages of lensectomy over conventional sur­gery are discussed.

 
  References Top

1.
Maumenee AE, Meredith TA:, 1974, Current Con­cepts in Cataract Surgery : Selected Proceedings of the Third Biennial Cataract Surgical Congress. NM Emery, D Paton, eds. CV Mosby Co., St. Louis.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Merin S, Crawford JS: 1972, Cand J Ophthalmol 7/ 56  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Hiles DA, Waller PH:, 1974, Ophthalmic Surg 5 (2) : 13  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Peyman, Sanders and Goldberg:, 1980, Principals and Practice of Ophthalmology, W.B. Sanders Co., N.Y.P. 609  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Jaff N:, 1976, Current Concepts in Cataract Sur­gery : Selected Proceedings of the Fourth Biennial Cataract Surgical Congress. J Emery, D Paton, eds. CV Mosby Co. St. Louis.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Jaffe NS:, 1976, Cataract Surgery and Its Com­plications 3d 2. CV Mosby Co., St. Louis p 258.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Bernardino VB, Kim JC, Smith TR:, 1969, Arch Ophthalmol. 82: 742.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Ryan SJ, von Noorden GK:, 1971, Amer J Ophthalmol. 71:626.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Kanski JJ, Elkington AR Daniel R:, 1974, Brit J Ophthalmol. 58: 92.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Hiles DA, Hurite FG:, 1973, Amer J Ophthalmol. 75 : 473  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Cleabby GW, Fung WE, Webster RG Jr:, 1974, Amer J Ophthalmol. 77 :384.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Kelman CD:, 1973. Amer J Ophthalmol. 75: 64.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Kratz RP:, 1976, Current Concepts in Cataract Surgery : Selected Proceedings of the Fourth Biennial Cataract Surgical Congress. JM Emery, D Paton, eds. CV Mosby Co. St. Louis.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Emery JM, Little JH:, 1979, Phacoemulsification and Aspiration of Cataracts : Techniques, Com­plications. and Results. CV Mosby Co, St. Louis.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Hurite FG:, 1974, Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol 78 : OP14.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Peyman GA, Sanders DR. Rose M, Korey M:, 1977, Albrecht Von Gaefes Arch Klin Ophthalmol. 202(4) : 305.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Machmer R, Aaherg T.M.:, 1977, Vitrectomy. Grune & Stration Inc., N.Y. p 145.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Machmer RAabergT.M.,1977, Vitrectomy. Grune & Stration Inc., N.Y. p 146.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Peyman GA, Huamonte FU, Goldberg MF, San­ders DR et al:, 1978, Arch. Ophthalmol 96: 45-50.  Back to cited text no. 19
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table - 1], [Table - 2], [Table - 3], [Table - 4], [Table - 5]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
MATERIAL & METHODS
Observations and...
Summary
References
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1412    
    Printed32    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded0    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal