About us |  Subscription |  Top cited articles |  e-Alerts  | Feedback |  Login   
  Home | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Search | Instructions   Print this article Email this article   Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
 
 Official publication of All India Ophthalmological Society   Users Online: 139
  Search
 
   Next article
   Previous article 
   Table of Contents
  
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    [PDF Not available] *
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
    Introduction
    Materials and Me...
    Observations
    Discussion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed912    
    Printed34    
    Emailed6    
    PDF Downloaded0    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

 


 
ARTICLE
Year : 1987  |  Volume : 35  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 207-210
 

Role of occlusion in treatment of intermittent exotropia


,

Correspondence Address:
S K Vishnoi
,

Login to access the Email id


PMID: 3506931

Get Permissions

 

   Abstract 

Sensory and Motor effects of occlusion in 37 patients of intermittent exotropia have been discussed 25 patients were given part time occlusion and 12 patients were given full time occlusion. Part time occlusion was found to be more effective and more acceptable than full time occlusion.



How to cite this article:
Vishnoi S K, Singh V, Mehra M K. Role of occlusion in treatment of intermittent exotropia. Indian J Ophthalmol 1987;35:207-10

How to cite this URL:
Vishnoi S K, Singh V, Mehra M K. Role of occlusion in treatment of intermittent exotropia. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 1987 [cited 2013 May 24];35:207-10. Available from: http://www.ijo.in/text.asp?1987/35/4/207/26178



   Introduction Top


About 85% cases of Comitant alternating exotropia are of an intermittent nature These cases are characterized by periods of manifest divergent strabismus alternated with periods of latent stra­bismus. The condition is thought to be due to neuromuscular incoordination of central origin [Figure 1]. A weakness of the convergence [1] or an excessive divergence [2],[3] innervation will result in exophoria. This gradually decompensates to become intermittent exotropia During the periods of tropia the patient experiences troublesome diplopia, which is overcome by activation of strong fusional reserves When the fusional reserves fail to resolve the troublesome diplopia, the patient has to resort to facultative suppression which in turn inhibits the fusional reflexes and thereby favours the tropic phase. Thus strong fusional reflexes and good convergence favour the phoric phase, whereas facultative suppression and weak fusional reserves promote the tropic phase. Occlusion abolishes diplopia which is a strong stimulus for development of facultative suppression.

Occlusion is not a new form of treatment nor it is novel in its application It has been reported to be an effective method of treatment of intermittent exotropia [4],[5],[6],[7],[8],[9],[10],[11] . Its utility lies in eliminating supp­ression increasing fusional amplitudes, increasing periods of phoria and decreasing the strabismic angle.


   Materials and Methods Top


We have assessed the effectivity of this method of treatment in 37 patients of intermittent exotropia. None of the patients had been subjected to previous strabismus surgery. The age of the patients ranged from 7 to 32 years Above 80% (31) of the patients had good corrected visual acuity in both eyes None of the eyes had a vision poorer than 6/12. 22 patients were eme­tropes and 15 were myopes of varying degrees.

We gave alternate occlusion to our patients The occlusion was total and adhesive in type. The patch was worn over one eye for one week and over the other eye the following week The patients wre arbitrarily divided into two groups

Group - I : Part time occlusion - 25 patients 6 hrs/day x 7 days a week

Group - II: Full time occlusion - 12 patients, 24 hrs/day x 7 days a week

The occlusion treatment was given for a period of 6 to 12 weeks Patients were subjected periodically to a detailed orthoptic check-up including correc­ted visual acuity cover test measurement of angle of deviation on the synoptophore and by Prism Bar and Cover test for near (with and without + 3.00 D. Sph.) and distance, conver­gence ocular movements, detection of suppre­ssion and measurement of fusional amplitudes Follow up was done every 15 days.


   Observations Top


To assess the role of occlusion following sensory (Elimination of Suppression and chance in fusio­nal amplitudes) and motor (change in mean exodeviation, conversion of intermittent tropia to phoria) effects were looked for

(1) Elimination of suppression : [Table 1]

Elimination of facultative suppression is neces­sary for further fusional training Out of the 37 patients 15 were found to have facultative supp­ression as tested on the Worth's Four Dot Test and Synoptophore. After 6 to 12 weeks of occlu­sion suppression was abolished in 13 patients. 2 patients who failed to overcome facultative suppression had large angle tropias more than 25 to 30 prism diopters.

72% of patients given part time occlusion and25% of the patients given full time occlusion, were found to have a better control over their deviations and were found to convert to predominent phoric phase.

(2) Change in fusional amplitudes : [Table 2]

The amplitudes of fusion as tested on the synoptophore was found to improve in 88% (22/25) cases in Group I and 50% cases of Group-II

(3) Change in Mean Exodeviation: [Table 3]

Some reduction in the amount of exodeviation was also observed, more so in patients treated by part time occlusion than those treated by full time occlusion

[Figure 2] illustrates a comparison of the results obtained after part time occlusion (Group I) vs full time occlusion (Group 11) in terms of elimination of suppression, improvement in fusional range, decrease in angle of deviation and conversion to predominant phoric phase Patients treated by part time occlusion responded better than those treated by full time occlusion.

We investigated the possible negative effects of occlusion on either (both) the sensory responses and/or motor control of the deviations We did not observe any negative sensory or motor effects The patients, who had an initial deviation of 30 prism dioptres or more did not benefit by occlusion treatment.


   Discussion Top


Occlusion by itself, is obviously, not a complete therapy for intermittent exotropia, but it has a definite place in the treatment of intermittent exotropia.

We agree with Flynn [11] that particularly in that group of patients where decision to operate or treat conservatively is a borderline and difficult one, occlusion must be tried as it may also furnish information helpful in mating the decision.

We support the views of Chutter CP. [9] and Jampolsky [1] that part time occlusion is equally or more effective than full time occlusion Occlusion alternated with no occlusion prevents suppression from occuring much of the time yet allows binocular fusion to occur some of the time while disrupting any firm fixation patterns, it is also easier to carry out and more acceptable to the patients.

Though the long term result of occlusion treat­ment are yet to be studied, we feel that part time occlusion is a straight forward safe and effective method of treatment of intermittent exotropia, particularly of milder degree (angle less than 25 prism dioptres). It provides us with a method of actively treating this type of exodeviation with the ability to reducing the size of strabismic angle, as well as to enhance fusional amplitudes, thus obviating the need for surgery in some patients To disregard this form of treatment would be to deny the patient a better chance for a good and stable result.[Table 4]

 
   References Top

1.Jampolsky, A : Vol. 4: No. 3, Sept 1964; 629-657.  Back to cited text no. 1    
2.Adler, FR Ed 3. St Louis The CV. Mosby Ca, 1959, p 473.  Back to cited text no. 2    
3.BIodi F.C and Van Allen MW. Docum OphthaL 16: 21-34; 1962.  Back to cited text no. 3    
4.lacobucci G Henderson J.W.: Am Orthopt J.15: 42-47; 1965.  Back to cited text no. 4    
5.Seaber, J. H.: Am Orthopt J. 18: 119; 124, 1968.  Back to cited text no. 5    
6.Altizer, L EL : Am. Orthopt J. 22, 71-76; 1972.  Back to cited text no. 6    
7.Niederecker, O.K Scott W.E: Am Orthopt J. 25: 1975; 90-91.  Back to cited text no. 7    
8.Cooper, EL and Leyman LA : Am. Orthopt J. 27;pp.61-67, 1977.  Back to cited text no. 8    
9.Chutter, CP.: Am Orthopt J. 27; pp 80-84; 1977.  Back to cited text no. 9    
10.Spoor, D.K and Hiles, D.A : Ophthalmology. Vol.86, No. 2, pp2152-2157, December, 1979.  Back to cited text no. 10    
11.Flynn. J.T.; Mc Kenney, S. and Rosenhouse, M Management of intermittent exotropia in Orthoptics Past Present and future. Moore, S. K Mein. J. Stockbridge L (Eds.), New Vorl, Grune and Stratton; 1976; pp 551-557.  Back to cited text no. 11    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
Previous article Next article

    

© 2005 - Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
Published by Medknow

Online since 1st April '05