Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 1205
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

   Table of Contents      
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 1991  |  Volume : 39  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 59-61

Conjunctival microbial flora in leprosy


Dr. Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, All Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi-110 029, India

Correspondence Address:
S P Garg
Dr. Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, All Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi-110 029
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


PMID: 1916982

Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Conjunctival sacs of seventy one leprosy patients, paramedical and medical personnel working in a leprosy home were cultured. None of these eyes had any pathology in the outer eye. Surprisingly, 46.2% of the eyes which showed a positive culture carried accepted pathogens; Staphylococcus aureus being the commonest. Determining the preoperative bacterial flora and their elimination before undertaking intraocular surgery is recommended.

Keywords: Microbial Flora, Leprosy, Antibiotics


How to cite this article:
Garg S P, Kalra V K, Verma L. Conjunctival microbial flora in leprosy. Indian J Ophthalmol 1991;39:59-61

How to cite this URL:
Garg S P, Kalra V K, Verma L. Conjunctival microbial flora in leprosy. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 1991 [cited 2020 Apr 4];39:59-61. Available from: http://www.ijo.in/text.asp?1991/39/2/59/24468



Click here to view


Click here to view


Click here to view


Click here to view


Click here to view


Click here to view

  Introduction Top


There is no disease which so frequently gives rise to disorders of the eye, as leprosy does. There are an estimated 500,000 to 750,000 patients in the world who are blind due to leprosy [1]. All forms of leprosy may give rise to an acute iritis which, if left untreated, may lead to a profound and permanent loss of vision. Cataract is common in most parts of the world where leprosy is endemic. Many believe that there is no true leprosy cataract and the lens changes observed are part of the changes of senility. Certainly there is a higher incidence of cataract after acute iritis and it may be a major complication in untreated patient [2]. Before lens extrac­tion is planned, it is always desirable to study the micro­bial flora of the conjunctival sac as it is this indigenous flora which is the most important source of postoperative Infection [3],[7].

In this study we have cultured the conjunctival sacs of leprosy patients with no evidence of clinical infection in the outer eye and also those of healthy people working in the same vicinity to determine the bacterial load they carry. The findings reported here are revealing.


  Material and methods Top


The patients were examined clinically at Leprosy Home, Seema Puri, Shadara, Delhi, situated at a distance of 25 km. from Dr. Rajendra Prasad Centre. Microbiological specimens were taken to the R.P. Centre. Conjunctival sac specimens were collected with sterile cotton-wool swabs which were inserted in test tubes containing sterile nutrient broth for bacterial cultures. For fungal cultures the swabs were immediately streaked on Sabo­urand's dextrose agar slants. Both the materials were simultaneously collected around 12 O'clock and were transported to the ocular microbiology laboratory within 3 hours at an ambient temperature of 30°C overnight before subculturing on sheep blood agar medium. Only aerobic cultures were done. Bacteria were identified by standard laboratory procedures. The sensitivity of reco­gnised pathogens to penicillin, streptomycin, tetracy­cline, chloramphenicol, erythromycin, gentamycin, clox­acillin and olymixin-B was tested by the standard disc diffusion technique and the results were interpreted as recommended by Bauer et a1 [8].

The slants were incubated at 28° C for 7-10 days before identification of the fungal isolates was done.

Cultures were also taken from the medical and para­medical staff working in the leprosy home. Only clinically clean eyes were chosen.


  Results Top


A total of 71 eyes of leprosy patients and their attendants from a leprosy home were cultured. Bacterial growth was positive in 97.2% of the eyes and only two eyes were sterile. Out of a total of 78 bacterial isolates, 36 were recognised pathogens [Table - 1]. The correlation of the clinical category with the pathogens is shown in [Table - 2]. Staphylococcus aureus was the commonest pathogen, followed by Acinetobacter cacoaceticus, Ps­eudomonas aeruginosa and Proteus mirabilis. Entero­bacter aerogenes and Streptococcus pneumoniae were isolated once. The non-pathogens included strains of Staphylococcus epidermidis, aerobic spore bearing ba­cilli, diphtheroids and micrococci. Fungi were cultured from 79.0% of the samples, the commonest being spe­cies of Aspergillus, Alternaria and Phialophora.

Sensitivity pattern of 36 pathogenic strains and 3 strains of S. epidermidis to routinely used antibiotics is shown in [Table - 3].


  Discussion Top


Several studies of the ocular flora of healthy eyes of children and adults all over the world, consistently con­firm the preponderance of staphylococci and diphtheroi­ds; streptococci including pneumococci being infreque­ntly present. Others are far less frequently seen [6][9][11] . Of the staphylococci, S. epidermidis is present in almost 50-90% of the eyes and the pathogenic variety. S. aureus can be cultured from the lid margins or con­junctiva in 6-35% of the normal subjects. However, our recently concluded study from Delhi and its surrounding areas revealed S. epidermidis and S. aureus in 37.1 and 6.4% respectively in the normal sacs [9]. One may think that there is nothing more to report on the microbial flora of the healthy sacs. The interesting findings obtained in this small study compelled us to revive this subject again. Over seventy seven per cent of the 71 eyes of leprosy patients and staff working in a leprosy home, carrying staphylococci is alarming. It is notewor­thy that none of these eyes showed any pathology of the outer eye. Even if we ignore the non-pathogenic staph­ylococcus, which has now been established as an op­portunistic pathogen, the percentage of eyes carrying coagulase positive S. aureus is considerably high (33.8%). The presence of other pathogens is also notab­ly high (17.0%). From these findings we wish to arouse not only the awareness about the substantially higher number of people in a leprosy home carrying pathogens or potential pathogens but also to emphasise that their elimination from the sac must be ascertained before undertaking intraocular surgery. Interestingly most of the organisms were found sensitive to commonly used antibacterial antibiotics; cloxacillin, gentamycin, framy­cetin and erythromycin being the drugs of choice.

 
  References Top

1.
Editorial Blindness in leprosy. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 65:221-222.1981.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Ffytche T.J.: The eye and leprosy. Lepr. Rev. 52:111-119. 1981.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Allen H.F.. Mangtiaracine A.B. : Bacterial endophthalmitis after cataract extraction. Arch. Ophthal. 72: 454-462. 1964.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Allen H.F.. Mangliaracine A.B. : Bacterial endophthalmdtis after cataract extraction- Arch. Ophthalmol. 91: 3.7. 1974.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Fahmy J. A.. Molter S.. Benzton M.W. : Bacterial flora in relation to cataract extraction III. Postoperative flora. Acta Ophthalmot. 53: 765-780. 1975  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Locatcher K.D. Seegal B.C. : Microbiology of the eye. SL Louis: Mosby. 1972.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Mahajan. V.M. : Postoperative ocular infections - an analysis of laboratory data on 750 cases. Ann. Ophthalmol. accepted for publication, 1984.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Bauer. A W.. Kirby. W.M M.. Sherris J.C.. Turck M.: Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardised single disc method. Am. J. Clin. Path. 21 : 93-96, 1968.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Mahajan V.M.: Acute bacterial infections of the eye : Their aetiology and treatment. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 67: 191-194. 1983  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Perkins R E., Kundsin R.B.. Pratt M.V., Abrahamsen I.. Leibcwitz H.M. Bacteriology of normal and infected conjunctiva. J Clin. Microhiol. I 147-149. 1979.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Seal D.V.. Barett S D.. McGiII J.I.: Etiology and treatment of acute bacterial infection of the external eye Br. J. Ophthalmol 66:3 57-360. 1982   Back to cited text no. 11
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table - 1], [Table - 2], [Table - 3]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Material and methods
Results
Discussion
References
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2507    
    Printed80    
    Emailed2    
    PDF Downloaded1    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal