Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 458
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

   Table of Contents      
CASE REPORT
Year : 1994  |  Volume : 42  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 213-214

Orbital apex syndrome : A rare complication of septorhinoplasty


Department of Ophthalmology, Christian Medical College & Hospital, Ludhiana, India

Correspondence Address:
S G Jaison
Department of Ophthalmology, Christian Medical College & Hospital, Ludhiana 141008
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


PMID: 10577002

Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Jaison S G, Bhatty S M, Chopra S K, Satija V. Orbital apex syndrome : A rare complication of septorhinoplasty. Indian J Ophthalmol 1994;42:213-4

How to cite this URL:
Jaison S G, Bhatty S M, Chopra S K, Satija V. Orbital apex syndrome : A rare complication of septorhinoplasty. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 1994 [cited 2020 Mar 28];42:213-4. Available from: http://www.ijo.in/text.asp?1994/42/4/213/25559

Orbital apex syndrome consists of involvement of the second, third, fourth, sixth and ophthalmic division of the fifth cranial nerves as they pass through the optic foramen and superior orbital fissure at the apex of the orbit. This is commonly due to space occupying and inflammatory lesions or trauma involving the apex of the orbit. [1]

We report a case of orbital apex syndrome following septorhinoplasty. To the best of our knowledge, this complication has not been reported in the literature.


  Case report Top


A 50-year-old male presented with a history of a road traffic accident resulting in closed head injury and multiple fractures of the craniofacial bones. Following the trauma he developed convergent squint in the right eye and binocular horizontal diplopia.

One year following the trauma he underwent septorhinoplasty under general anaesthesia for gross traumatic deviated nasal septum towards the right, occluding the right nasal passage.

Surgical Procedure

The left nasal cavity was exposed with nasal specu­lum. Two percent xylocaine with adrenaline (1:200000) was used to infiltrate and raise the mucoperichondrium and mucoperiosteum of the nasal septum. Incision was given at the caudal end of the septum on the left side. With a perichondrial elevator, mucoperichondrium and mucoperiosteum was elevated. Pressure was applied at the bony cartilaginous junction to deflect the cartilagi­nous septum. Through the gap thus produced between the bony and cartilaginous septum, the elevator was introduced and the mucoperiosteum of the right side was also elevated, exposing the perpendicular plate of ethmoid and vomer bones. These bones were partially removed with Luc's forceps. Antibiotic-soaked glove packs were used to pack both nasal cavities.

At the end of the surgery, the patient was found to have marked proptosis and subconjunctival haemor­rhage of the right eye. There was also periorbital ecchy­mosis on the right side. In the immediate postoperative period there was ptosis of the upper lid and total loss of vision in the right eye.

Examination a few days later revealed a visual acuity of no light perception in the right eye and 6/6 in the left eye. The right eye had subconjunctival haemorrhage and ecchymosis in the periorbital region. There was com­plete ptosis of the right upper lid with no levator palpeb­rae superioris action [Figure - 1]. The right eyeball was fifteen degrees hypoesotropic. Ocular movements were restricted in all the cardinal directions of gaze [Figure - 2]. Pupil was dilated (5 mm), with absence of direct and consensual reactions to light. Corneal sensation and cutaneous sensation in the area of distribution of oph­thalmic division of the fifth cranial nerve were absent on the right side.

On ophthalmoscopy, the optic disc appeared to be normal. Intraocular pressure was 16 mm of Hg in both eyes. Left eye had enophthalmos and irregular orbital margins due to the old fracture [Figure - 1].

CT scan of the orbits demonstrated fracture of the ethmoid bone in the medial wall of the right orbit into which right medial rectus muscle was incarcerated [Figure - 3].

There was no fracture in the superior orbital fissure or optic foramen region. The incarceration of the medial rectus muscle was confirmed by forced duction test. Examination at three months postseptorhinoplasty re­vealed gross pallor of the optic disc in the right eye. Previous ocular findings continued to persist.


  Discussion Top


Blindness has rarely been a complication of surgical procedures in the orbit. It has been attributed to intraoperative or postoperative orbital haemorrhage, manipulation of the optic nerve, etc . [2] Visual loss following intranasal endoscopic surgery has also been reported . [3] Loss of vision following cosmetic blepheroplasty is also a documented tragedy. The mechanism of such an event may be related to occult orbital haemorrhage during lid manipulation or prolonged pressure on the globe due to the tight bandage in the postoperative period. [4]

The simple surgical procedure of septoplasty has been very rarely complicated by blindness due to central retinal artery spasm.[5] But to the best of our knowledge, orbital apex syndrome has not been reported in the literature as a complication of septorhinoplasty. Even though surgical procedure in itself was uneventful, undiagnosed fractured ethmoid bone into which medial rectus muscle was incarcerated resulted in severe orbital haemorrhage. As the fibrous tissue at the fracture site tends to be highly vascular, even minimal disturbance in this region at the time of surgery could have resulted in massive orbital haemorrhage, causing severe pressure on the cranial nerves in the orbital apex.

Immediate diagnosis and timely decompressive procedure probably could have saved the patient from this tragedy. Patients who have sustained fracture of the cranofacial bones should be subjected to thorough ex­amination and necessary investigations prior to contem­plating on any surgical procedure in and around the orbit and any such surgical procedure should be under­taken with great caution.

 
  References Top

1.
Vaughan D, Asbury T. Neuro-ophthalmology. In General Ophthalmolgy. 9th ed. Los Altos, California, Lange Medical Publications, 1980; pp 213-245.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Long JC, Ellis PP. Total unilateral visual loss following orbital surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 71:218, 1971  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Stankiewicz J. Blindness and intranasal endoscopic ethmoi­dectomy - prevention and management. Otolaryngol Head and Neck Surg 101:320-329, 1989.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Moser MH, Dipirro E, McCoy FJ. Sudden blindness follow­ing blepheroplasty: Report of seven cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 51:364, 1973.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Rettinger G, Christ P, Meythaler FH. Blindness caused by central artery occlusion following nasal septum correction. H NO 38:105-109,1990.  Back to cited text no. 5
    


    Figures

  [Figure - 1], [Figure - 2], [Figure - 3]


This article has been cited by
1 Unilateral blindness following septoplasty
Shihada, R., Fradis, M., Vardizer, Y., Braun, J., Luntz, M.
Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology. 2008; 117(7): 528-530
[Pubmed]
2 Orbital apex syndrome
Yeh, S., Foroozan, R.
Current Opinion in Ophthalmology. 2004; 15(6): 490-498
[Pubmed]
3 Orbital apex syndrome after ethmoidal artery ligation for recurrent epistaxis
Yeh, S., Yen, M.T., Foroozan, R.
Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2004; 20(5): 392-394
[Pubmed]
4 An unexpected complication after rhinoplasty: Pneumothorax [3]
Eroglu, L., Akbas, H., Guneren, E., Demir, A., Baris, S., Demircan, S.
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2002; 110(3): 992-993
[Pubmed]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Case report
Discussion
References
Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed5625    
    Printed139    
    Emailed2    
    PDF Downloaded0    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 4    

Recommend this journal