Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 1441
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

   Table of Contents      
BRIEF REPORT
Year : 2001  |  Volume : 49  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 115-116

Fish hook injury to the eyelid


Department of Ophthalmology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Grampian University Hospital, United Kingdom

Correspondence Address:
Sathish Srinivasan
Department of Ophthalmology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Grampian University Hospital, United Kingdom

Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


PMID: 15884516

Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Srinivasan S, Macleod S. Fish hook injury to the eyelid. Indian J Ophthalmol 2001;49:115-6

How to cite this URL:
Srinivasan S, Macleod S. Fish hook injury to the eyelid. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2001 [cited 2020 Feb 27];49:115-6. Available from: http://www.ijo.in/text.asp?2001/49/2/115/22645

Fishing is recreational activity enjoyed by millions of people worldwide. Although uncommon in developing countries it is a popular pastime in the Western world, and, given this popularity, a number of associated personal injuries are probably inevitable. We report a case of fish hook injury to the eyelid and discuss the various techniques available for removal of fish hooks. The terminologies associated with various parts of the fish hook are also illustrated.


  Case Report Top


In the course of casting his fishing time, a 50 year-old male sustained a fish hook injury in his left upper lid. He presented to the Ophthalmic casualty with a fishhook embedded in his left upper lid. He had cut off the line, but had made no attempt to remove the hook. On examination he had an aided visual acuity of 6/6, N5 in both eyes. The fish hook had pierced the lateral aspect of the upper eyelid through the skin, above the lateral canthus. The fish hook was covered with artificial feathers, which were brushing against the lateral bulbar conjunctiva [Figure - 1]. Slitlamp examination of the left eye was unremarkable.

Under local anesthesia (2% xylocaine with 1 in 200,00 adrenaline) the barb of the fish hook was pushed out through the undersurface of the eyelid and was cut off using wire cutters. This was essential to minimize movement of the fish hook and reduce trauma. We obtained wire cutters from a helpful hospital electrician, and disinfected them using 70% isopropyl alcohol wipes. The hook shank was then backed out (Back -Out technique) through its entrance wound. Since atraumatic removal was achieved the eyelid required no stitches.


  Discussion Top


Fishing is a popular leisure activity in many parts of the world. Indeed, in 1653, Sir Isaac Walton described fishing as "the contemplative man's recreation".[1] Ocular fishhook injuries though uncommon, can cause potentially devastating ocular trauma. Aiello et al[2] reported five cases of penetrating ocular fishhook injuries and showed that with appropriated surgical techniques excellent visual outcome can be achieved in these cases. Although fishhook injuries to the eyelid are not sight threatening, appropriate techniques have to be employed to remove the fishhook and avoid major damage to the eyelid anatomy.

Fish hooks can be loaded with various baits. This patient had been fly-fishing and the fish hook was decorated with colored feathers (which resemble flies). Recently Kamath[3] described a case of fishhook injury to the eyelid in which the fish hook was loaded with live maggots. It is vital to understand the various parts of the fishhook before any attempt is made to remove it [Figure - 2]. Although single barbs are common they may have multiple barbs, making removal quite complex.

Four techniques for the removal of fish hooks embedded in non-ocular tissues have been reported in the medical literature.[4-7] Their advantages, drawbacks and use in ophthalmic injuries are detailed below.

The Back-Out method refers to backing the hook out through its entrance wound. Although technically simple, it is primarily useful for barbless hooks. If a barb is present and engaged in ocular tissues, this method can cause excessive damage.

The Snatch technique is a modification of the back-out method, where downward pressure on the hook shank and rapid extraction are used to diminish pain during the removal procedure in nonocular tissues. This is a relatively traumatic technique and not advised for penetrating ocular injuries.

The Advance and Cut method is the most useful technique in anterior segment fishhook injuries. This procedure has been previously photographically documented[8]. Briefly, the hook shank is grasped firmly, and a controlled surgical incision is placed to allow atraumatic delivery of the point and barb. Sterile wire cutters are used to transect the hook at a location between the barb and bend, after which the barbless hook is easily removed using the back-out technique described previously. Advantages of the advance and cut method include a surgically controlled second wound, no enlargement of the primary wound and minimal traumatic manipulation.

The usual method of choice for hook penetration of the retina is the needle-cover technique described by Grand and Lobes.[6] This procedure entails passing a large bore needle into the eye through the hook entry wound. The fishhook barb is then engaged within the lumen of the needle and both are with drawn together.

An ophthalmologist may be considerably taken aback when confronted with the formidable task of removing large foreign body such as a fish hook from the eye. The hook can be successfully removed with minimal trauma to ocular structures by understanding the structure of the fish hook and by employing the correct technique.



 
  References Top

1.
Walton I. The Compleate Angler: or The Contemplative Man's Recreation. London: Printed by T.M for R.Marriot, 1653  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Aiello LP, Iwamoto M, Guyer DR. Penetrating ocular fishhook injuries. Ophthalmology 1992;99:862-66.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
3.
Kamath GG. Fish hook injury of the eyelid: An unusual case. Br J Ophthalmol 2000;84:441-42.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Mandelcorn MS, Crichton A. Fish hook removal from vitreous and retina (Letter). Arch Ophthalmol 1989;107:493.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Hung SO, Smerdon D. Eyeball injury due to fishhook, journal of Trauma 1984;24:997-98.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
6.
Grand MG, Lobes LA Jr. Technique for removing a fish hook from the posterior segment of the eye. Arch Ophthalmol 1980;98:152-53.  Back to cited text no. 6
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
7.
Bartholomew RS, MacDonald M. Fish hook injuries of the eye. Br J Ophthalmol 1980;64:531-33.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
8.
Aiello LP, Iwamoto M, Taylor HR. Perforating ocular fishhook injury. Arch Ophthalmol 1992;110:1316-17.  Back to cited text no. 8
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  


    Figures

  [Figure - 1], [Figure - 2]


This article has been cited by
1 A severe penetrating eye injury with a fish hook
Rashid, R.A., Ismail, S., Shaharuddin, B., Mustari, Z.
International Journal of Ophthalmology. 2009; 9(6): 1034-1035
[Pubmed]
2 Penetrating eyelid injury: A case report and review of literature
Wasfi, E., Kendrick, B., Yasen, T., Varma, P., Abd-Elsayed, A.A.
Head and Face Medicine. 2009; 5(1): Art 2
[Pubmed]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Case Report
Discussion
References
Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed4813    
    Printed112    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded0    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 2    

Recommend this journal