Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 267
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

   Table of Contents      
LETTER TO EDITOR
Year : 2002  |  Volume : 50  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 247

Childhood proptosis. The invaluable but overlooked peripheral blood smear.



Correspondence Address:
A Panda


Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


PMID: 12355707

Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

Keywords: Acute Disease, Blood Cell Count, Child, Child, Preschool, Exophthalmos, blood, diagnosis, etiology, Humans, Leukemia, Myeloid, blood, complications,


How to cite this article:
Panda A, Sudan R, Nainiwal S. Childhood proptosis. The invaluable but overlooked peripheral blood smear. Indian J Ophthalmol 2002;50:247

How to cite this URL:
Panda A, Sudan R, Nainiwal S. Childhood proptosis. The invaluable but overlooked peripheral blood smear. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2002 [cited 2020 Jun 3];50:247. Available from: http://www.ijo.in/text.asp?2002/50/3/247/14773

We read with interest the paper by Sethi et al titled "Childhood proptosis. The invaluable but overlooked peripheral blood smear".[1] The authors have highlighted the significance of peripheral blood smear examination in establishing the diagnosis of Acute Myeloid Leukaemia (AML). We must congratulate them for reviving the old concept.[2] We have reported four cases of childhood proptosis, three unilateral and one bilateral in the age group 4-11 years in 1984 where the diagnosis of AML was confirmed by peripheral blood smear examination. In the same article we had recommended that any patient with proptosis, either unilateral or bilateral should have a peripheral blood smear evaluation by experienced haematologists. Whatever the reason, the idea has not yet become popular despite its mention as early as 17 years ago in the same journal and from same centre.[2]

We agree with the authors that CT scan being an expensive tool is not available to most district hospitals. Incisional biopsy, a less expensive but surer tool for diagnosis cannot be done at peripheral centres due to lack of histopathological facilities. On the other hand, peripheral blood smear is the most easy and inexpensive mode of evaluation and is sufficient to diagnose AML even in the absence of systemic features.

Finally, we would like to commend the authors for stressing a simpler modality of diagnosis. We wonder how many of us would have missed the diagnosis by depending on costlier investigations. We once again appreciate the authors concern and thank them for sharing our view.



 
  References Top

1.
Sethi A, Ghose S, Gujral S, Jain P. Childhood proptosis. The invaluable though often overlooked peripheral blood smear. Indian J Ophthalmol 2001;49:121-24.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Panda A, Dayal Y. Acute proptosis in myeloid leukaemia. Indian J Ophthalmol 1984;34:239-41.  Back to cited text no. 2
    




 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2390    
    Printed84    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded163    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal