About us |  Subscription |  Top cited articles |  e-Alerts  | Feedback |  Login   
  Home | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Search | Instructions   Print this article Email this article   Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
 
 Official publication of All India Ophthalmological Society   Users Online: 213
  Search
 
   Next article
   Previous article 
   Table of Contents
  
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    [PDF Not available] *
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  



 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1544    
    Printed78    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded0    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal

 


 
LETTER TO EDITOR
Year : 2003  |  Volume : 51  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 283
 

Astigmatism after ECCE in eastern Nepal. Continuous versus interrupted sutures


,

Correspondence Address:
P Parmar


Login to access the Email id


PMID: 14601864

Get Permissions

 



How to cite this article:
Parmar P, Salman A. Astigmatism after ECCE in eastern Nepal. Continuous versus interrupted sutures. Indian J Ophthalmol 2003;51:283

How to cite this URL:
Parmar P, Salman A. Astigmatism after ECCE in eastern Nepal. Continuous versus interrupted sutures. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2003 [cited 2013 May 18];51:283. Available from: http://www.ijo.in/text.asp?2003/51/3/283/14661


Dear Editor,

We have read the article "Keratometric astigmatism after ECCE in Eastern Nepal". Continuous versus Interrupted sutures.1 The authors mention that at the end of 6 weeks patients who reviewed continuous suturing had significantly higher astigmatism compared to the patients who reviewed interrupted sutures. We do not agree with this statement reviewed. We routinely perform both type of suturing, continuous as well as interrupted, and in my cases, the overall postoperative astigmatism is significantly higher in cases with interrupted suturing than those with continuous suturing. The authors have stated that a majority of patients in both groups had with-the-rule astigmatism throughout the postoperative period, but in our hands astigmatism was predominantly with-the-rule in both groups. We at 4 weeks after surgery observed with-the-rule astigmatism is slightly more with interrupted sutures compared to continuous sutures. There was shift of astigmatism from with-the-rule to against-the-rule in both suturing techniques. This shift was greater in cases of interrupted than continuous sutures, at 12 weeks. In case of interrupted sutures, against-the-rule astigmatism was more and in case of continuous sutures, with-the-rule astigmatism was more.

To reduce the astigmatism in cases of manual ECCE with PCIOL, it is important that the suturing is neither too tight nor too loose, and the wound is closed properly without gap. It is true that despite the trend towards small incision cataract surgery, a bulk of cataracts in developing countries are operated by the age-old, time tested conventional extracapsular cataract extraction (ECCE).



This article has been cited by
1 Suture and surgically induced astigmatism after cataract surgery
Ratnagiri, P.K.
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology. 2004; 52(1): 87
[Pubmed]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
Previous article Next article

    

© 2005 - Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
Published by Medknow

Online since 1st April '05