Glyxambi
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 867
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

   Table of Contents      
LETTER TO EDITOR
Year : 2004  |  Volume : 52  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 256

Ocular manifestations of Behcet's disease in Indian patients.



Correspondence Address:
A Salman


Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


PMID: 15510474

Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

Keywords: Behcet Syndrome, complications, Eye Diseases, etiology, Female, Humans, India, Male


How to cite this article:
Salman A, Parmar P. Ocular manifestations of Behcet's disease in Indian patients. Indian J Ophthalmol 2004;52:256

How to cite this URL:
Salman A, Parmar P. Ocular manifestations of Behcet's disease in Indian patients. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2004 [cited 2019 Dec 12];52:256. Available from: http://www.ijo.in/text.asp?2004/52/3/256/14575

Dear Editor,

The article by Rohtagi and Singhal on "Ocular manifes-tations of Behcet's disease in Indian Patients"[1] was interesting. In their series, only two patients had evidence of iridocyclitis (one active and one healed) and no patient had evidence of posterior uveitis. From this, they conclude that "the disease occurs in a much milder form in India and is primarily mucocutaneous and arthritic" The absence of posterior segment pathology in their study group is ascribed to female preponderance and early diagnosis. We believe that these conclusions are erroneous. The low prevalence of uveitis and the total absence of posterior uveitis in this study are more likely due to the fact that all cases in the study presented to the department of dermatology. Thus, these patients were obviously more likely to have mucocutaneous lesions and less likely to have ocular complaints. If the authors had also included those cases who presented to their department of ophthalmology with intraocular inflammation and were then diagnosed to be suffering from Behcet's disease, a more accurate picture of ocular Behcet's disease would have been possible.

Although Behcet's disease in Indians is indeed rare (0.09% of all cases seen at the Uvea clinic at our hospital were diagnosed as Behcet's disease), these patients did have severe anterior and posterior uveitis, which was sometimes unresponsive to corticosteroid therapy and potentially blinding. As the authors themselves state, "the burden of diagnostic recognition of Behcet's disease often lies with the ophthalmologist as many patients first present to them with ocular symptoms," it is difficult to understand why they studied cases referred from the department of dermatology alone.



 
  References Top

1.
Rohtagi J, Singal A. Ocular manifestations of Behcet's disease in Indian patients. Indian J Ophthalmol 2003;51:309-13.  Back to cited text no. 1
    



This article has been cited by
1 Adamantiades-Behçetæs disease and CML: A case report and review of literature
Doval, D.C., Pande, S.B., Khatri, S., Rai, S., Sharma, J.B., Sarin, J., Arora, S., (...), Vaid, A.K.
HAEMA. 2006; 9(4): 579-581
[Pubmed]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2605    
    Printed101    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded0    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal