About us |  Subscription |  Top cited articles |  e-Alerts  | Feedback |  Login   
  Home | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Search | Instructions Celebrating 60 Years   Print this article Email this article   Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
 
 Official publication of All India Ophthalmological Society   Users Online: 145
  Search
 
   Next article
   Previous article 
   Table of Contents
  
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    [PDF Not available] *
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
    Case report
    Discussion
    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed11848    
    Printed142    
    Emailed9    
    PDF Downloaded3    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 6    

Recommend this journal

 


 
BRIEF REPORT
Year : 2004  |  Volume : 52  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 327-8
 

Late dislocation of LASIK flap following fingernail injury.


Aravind Eye Hospital & Postgraduate Institute of Ophthalmology, Madurai, India

Date of Submission05-Mar-2003
Date of Acceptance05-Sep-2003

Correspondence Address:
M Srinivasan
Aravind Eye Hospital & Postgraduate Institute of Ophthalmology, Madurai
India
Login to access the Email id


PMID: 15693328

Get Permissions

 

   Abstract 

A case of traumatic flap displacement with a fingernail injury four years after LASIK is reported.


Keywords: Lasik, injury, flap dislocation


How to cite this article:
Srinivasan M, Prasad S, Prajna N V. Late dislocation of LASIK flap following fingernail injury. Indian J Ophthalmol 2004;52:327

How to cite this URL:
Srinivasan M, Prasad S, Prajna N V. Late dislocation of LASIK flap following fingernail injury. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2004 [cited 2014 Aug 20];52:327. Available from: http://www.ijo.in/text.asp?2004/52/4/327/14559


Laser in Situ Keratomileusis (LASIK) is increasingly performed to correct refractive errors. Traumatic flap displacement after LASIK, though rare, has been reported earlier.[1] To the best of our knowledge, all previously reported cases occurred within 4 years of LASIK. We report herewith a case of traumatic flap displacement caused by a fingernail injury, four years after LASIK.


   Case report Top


A 23-year-old lady presented in August 2002, with complaints of irritation, watering and defective vision in the right eye following an accidental fingernail trauma from her 6-month-old child.

Her records showed that she had undergone bilateral simultaneous myopic LASIK elsewhere 4 years earlier for a preoperative myopia of 6 DSph. Her postoperative course was apparently uneventful and she had recovered to best corrected visual acuity of 6/6. She was asymptomatic in both eyes following the procedure. As per her records the procedure had been performed with a Hansatome and a Bausch & Lomb 217c excimer laser. She was seen three hours following the injury with a visual acuity of 3/60 in the right eye and 6/6 P in the left eye. The conjunctiva in the right eye was congested and the corneal cap was displaced around 1.5 mm inward circumferentially from 6 o' clock to 12 o' clock hours with flap folds across the visual axis [Figure - 1]. The left eye was normal with a well-anchored, well centered corneal cap.

Flap replacement was performed an hour after presentation. The flap was refloated using balanced salt solution under peribulbar anaesthesia and anchored with four interrupted 10-0 nylon sutures. A large epithelial defect was seen from the 7 o' clock to 12 o' clock position. The patient was advised to use a combination of Tobramycin (0.3 mg %) and Dexamethasone (0.1mg %), four times a day for 10 days. She was reviewed after 10 days; the flap had healed well with the sutures in place. She was advised to taper her eye drops over the next 10 days and was reviewed 20 days after the repositioning. At this follow-up, two sutures which had become loose were removed. Small islands of epithelial ingrowth were seen at the 7 o' clock and 8 o' clock positions, extending about 4 mm inside the corneal cap, up to the temporal margin of the pupil [Figure - 2]. The visual acuity had improved to 6/6 P and the patient had no visual complaints. No active intervention was done since the patient was asymptomatic and she was reviewed periodically. The epithelial islands were non-progressive at the sixth month follow-up [Figure - 3].


   Discussion Top


Most complications associated with LASIK are flap related.[2] They include intraoperative flap complications like shifted flap, buttonhole formation, free flap and wrinkled flap[3] and postoperative complications like micro and macro striae and flap slippage and dislocation.

The mechanism postulated for early flap adherence includes endothelial pumping, capillarity, fiber interlacing, intracorneal suction, intracorneal molecular attraction and ionic bonding.[4] Whatever the mechanism, the anecdotal ease at which a flap can be lifted months after surgery for retreatment indicates that the flap actually never heals fully.

Flap slippage and displacement most commonly occur in the early postoperative period and presumably as a result of mechanical disruption such as forceful blinking, lid squeezing and eye rubbing. Late displacement, through rare, has been reported.[5]

Even though many reports have been published, no case has been described with such a complication four years after LASIK. It indicates that adhesion occurs only in the anterio-posterior plane and probably never happens in the tangential plane. Injuries due to shearing mechanisms such as a fingernail injury or a contact lens injury can more often cause flap displacement than seemingly heavier injury in the anterio-posterior direction such as boxing or blunt ocular trauma from occupational hazards. Patients should be warned of such sequelae. Likewise, foreign body removal with a spud or needle on a LASIK flap also carries a similar risk, acting like a shearing force.

Epithelial ingrowth is an often-reported complication especially following flap displacement. Conventional management includes aggressive scraping of the epithelial ingrowth after lifting the flap. In our case, the epithelial ingrowth was noticeable three weeks after the repositioning. Since the patient did not have visual complaints, we decided to observe her, and at the 6-month follow-up, the epithelial ingrowth was non-progressive. Aggressive scraping of the epithelial ingrowth may be unnecessary in most cases and can be considered if documented progression occurs.

In conclusion, the fragile adherence of the corneal flap even years after a LASIK procedure merits a discussion between the ophthalmologist and the patient. It should be a part of all informed consent procedures during LASIK surgery.



 
   References Top

1.Lin RT, Maloney RK. Flap complications associated with lamellar refractive surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 1999;127:129-36.  Back to cited text no. 1  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
2.Gimbel HV, Penno EE, van Westenbrugge JA, Ferensowicz M, Furlong MT. Incidence and management of intraoperative and early postoperative complications in 1000 consecutive Lasik cases. Ophthalmology 1998;105:1839-47.  Back to cited text no. 2  [PUBMED]  
3.Gimbel HV, Peters NT, Iskander NG, Penno A. Laser in situ keratomileusis flap complications and management. J Refract Surg 2000;16:223-25.  Back to cited text no. 3    
4.Perez EP, Viramontes B, Schor P, Miller D. Factors affecting corneal strip stroma to stroma adhesion. J Refract Surg 1998;14:460-62.  Back to cited text no. 4  [PUBMED]  
5.Aldave AJ, Hollander DA, Abbot RL. Late onset traumatic flap dislocation and diffuse lamellar inflammation after Laser in situ keratomileusis. Cornea 2002;21:604-7.   Back to cited text no. 5    


Figures

[Figure - 1], [Figure - 2], [Figure - 3]


This article has been cited by
1 Traumatic corneal flap displacement five years after Laser in situ keratomileusis
Grezda, A., Mema, V., Jaho, J., Dai, J.
Hippokratia. 2010; 14(1): 48-50
[Pubmed]
2 Visual acuity recovery after late traumatic femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis flap loss
Thomas, K.E., Tanzer, D.J.
Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. 2009; 35(6): 1134-1137
[Pubmed]
3 Treatment of lost flaps and slipped flaps
Geggel, H.S.
International Ophthalmology Clinics. 2008; 48(1): 65-71
[Pubmed]
4 LASIK interface fluid accumulation caused by glaucoma associated with herpetic keratouveitis: Case report | [Coleção fluídica na interface do LASIK causada por glaucoma secundário à ceratouveíte herpética: Relato de caso]
Nakano, E.M., Kuchembuck, M., Nakano, K., Oliveira, M., Alvarenga, L.S., Portellinha, W.
Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia. 2007; 70(1): 165-167
[Pubmed]
5 Traumatic late flap dehiscence and Enterobacter keratitis following LASIK
Cheung, L.M., Papalkar, D., Versace, P.
Journal of Refractive Surgery. 2006; 22(4): 402-404
[Pubmed]
6 Late-onset traumatic dislocation with central tissue loss of laser in situ keratomileusis flap
Pereira, C.D.R., Narvaez, J., King, J.A., Seery, L.S., Gimbel, H.V.
Cornea. 2006; 25(9): 1107-1110
[Pubmed]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
Previous article Next article

    

2005 - Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
Published by Medknow

Online since 1st April '05