Glyxambi
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 2758
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page


 
   Table of Contents      
LETTER TO EDITOR
Year : 2006  |  Volume : 54  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 64

Classification of amblyopia


Sion Eye Clinic and Microsurgery Centre, Laxmi Niwas,3,B/18. Sion (W), Mumbai - 400 022, India

Correspondence Address:
Neela Patwardhan
Sion Eye Clinic and Microsurgery Centre, Laxmi Niwas,3,B/18. Sion (W), Mumbai - 400 022
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0301-4738.21623

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Patwardhan N. Classification of amblyopia. Indian J Ophthalmol 2006;54:64

How to cite this URL:
Patwardhan N. Classification of amblyopia. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2006 [cited 2019 Oct 17];54:64. Available from: http://www.ijo.in/text.asp?2006/54/1/64/21623

Dear Editor,

I have read with interest the article on the profile of amblyopia by Menon et al .[1] Published literature on the clinical profile of amblyopia[2],[3] including the ongoing Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group trials[4] have, by convention, classified the sub-types of amblyopia as anisometropic, strabismic, mixed/combined anisometropia with strabismus and form deprivation. However, Menon et al[1] in their classification of amblyopia, have added two further sub-types such as ametropic and meridional amblyopia, bringing to our notice, that 18.44% (12.88+5.56 %) of patients had subnormal visual acuity without having anisometropia, strabismus or form deprivation. Some of these patients could also be having some contributing non-ocular pathology, requiring a pediatric neurological reference and laboratory investigations. These patients, by definition, are then not amblyopes. The remaining patients in this group would be those having an uncorrected refractive error and should improve with time, only with refractive adaptation i.e. without any specific amblyopia treatment. These are, therefore, not true amblyopes. However, due to lack of any other nomenclature, they get clubbed with amblyopes.

 
  References Top

1.
Menon V, Chaudhuri Z, Saxena R, Gill K, Sachdev MM. Profile of amblyopia in a hospital referral practice. Indian J Ophthalmol 2005;53:227-34  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
2.
Shah M, Khan MT, Khan MD, Rehman HU. Clinical profile of amblyopia in Pakistani children age 3 to 14 years. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2005;15:353-7.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Woodruff G, Hiscox FA, Thompson JR, Smith LK. Factors affecting the outcome of children treated for amblyopia. Eye 1994;8:627-31.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
The Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group. The Clinical Profile of Moderate Amblyopia in children younger than 7years. Arch Ophthalmol 2002;120:281-7.  Back to cited text no. 4
    



This article has been cited by
1 Classification of amblyopia
Menon, V., Chaudhuri, Z., Saxena, R., Gill, K., Sachdeva, M.
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology. 2006; 54(3): 212
[Pubmed]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed3309    
    Printed106    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded283    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal