COMMUNITY EYE CARE |
|
Year : 2007 | Volume
: 55
| Issue : 5 | Page : 365-371 |
|
Barriers to accessing eye care services among visually impaired populations in rural Andhra Pradesh, South India
Vilas Kovai1, Sannapaneni Krishnaiah1, Bindiganavale Ramaswamy Shamanna2, Ravi Thomas2, Gullapalli N Rao2
1 International Centre for Advancement of Rural Eye Care, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India; Vision CRC Ltd., UNSW, Sydney, Australia 2 International Centre for Advancement of Rural Eye Care, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India
Correspondence Address:
Vilas Kovai Social Scientist (Gr ii), ICARE - LV Prasad Eye Institute, LV Prasad Marg, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad - 500 034, India
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/0301-4738.33823
|
|
Purpose: To understand the reasons why people in rural south India with visual impairment arising from various ocular diseases do not seek eye care.
Materials and Methods: A total of 5,573 persons above the age of 15 were interviewed and examined in the South Indian state of Andhra Pradesh covering the districts of Adilabad, West Godavari and Mahaboobnagar. A pre-tested structured questionnaire on barriers to eye care was administered by trained field investigators.
Results: Of the eligible subjects, 1234 (22.1%, N=5573)) presented with distant visual acuity <20/60 or equivalent visual field loss in the better eye. Of these, 898 (72.7%, N=1234) subjects had not sought treatment despite noticing a decrease in vision citing personal, economic and social reasons. The analysis also showed that the odds of seeking treatment was significantly higher for literates [odds ratio (OR) 1.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.38 to 2.65], for those who would be defined as blind by visual acuity category (OR 1.35, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.90) and for those with cataract and other causes of visual impairment (OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.11 to 2.03). Barriers to seeking treatment among those who had not sought treatment despite noticing a decrease in vision over the past five years were personal in 42% of the respondents, economic in 37% and social in 21%.
Conclusion: Routine planning for eye care services in rural areas of India must address the barriers to eye care perceived by communities to increase the utilization of services. |
|
|
|
[FULL TEXT] [PDF]* |
|
|
|