Glyxambi
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 1399
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page


 
   Table of Contents      
SYMPOSIUM
Year : 2008  |  Volume : 56  |  Issue : 5  |  Page : 395-397

The socioeconomic impact of human immunodeficiency virus / acquired immune deficiency syndrome in India and its relevance to eye care


Community Ophthalmology Unit, Dr. R.P. Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

Date of Submission19-Mar-2007
Date of Acceptance31-Jul-2007
Date of Web Publication8-Aug-2008

Correspondence Address:
GVS Murthy
Community Ophthalmology Unit, Dr. R.P. Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0301-4738.42416

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection is aptly called the modern day 'plague' and has the potential to decimate people in the productive age group. On the other hand, the increasing life expectancy in developing countries spirals age-related blindness. One therefore reduces economic productivity while the other increases economic dependency. Both lead to increased expenditure of households though in different proportions. Human immunodeficiency virus and blindness are both associated with discrimination, stigma and long-term consequences. They impact the socioeconomic fabric of the affected individuals, communities and countries. The loss in productivity and the cost of support to the affected individuals are seen in both. Each is a potent problem on its own but together they spell disaster in geometric proportions rather than a simple additive effect. Strategies need to be evolved to provide solace and improve the quality of life of an HIV-positive blind individual.

Keywords: Blindness, human immunodeficiency virus, social status


How to cite this article:
Murthy G. The socioeconomic impact of human immunodeficiency virus / acquired immune deficiency syndrome in India and its relevance to eye care. Indian J Ophthalmol 2008;56:395-7

How to cite this URL:
Murthy G. The socioeconomic impact of human immunodeficiency virus / acquired immune deficiency syndrome in India and its relevance to eye care. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2008 [cited 2019 Mar 23];56:395-7. Available from: http://www.ijo.in/text.asp?2008/56/5/395/42416

When the world awoke to the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) era in 1981, few would have risked predicting that this 'modern-day plague' would infect 40 million worldwide, [1] causing 20 million deaths. [2] Globally, 2006 saw 4.3 million new infections and three million deaths due to acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). [2] The HIV pandemic has entered a new phase compared to the initial stages in that most of the present-day infection is seen in developing countries. Though the focus of international attention has mostly concentrated on sub-Saharan Africa, India is on the brink of disaster. [1] Disability has the potential to compound the misery of the HIV-positive individuals. The socioeconomic consequences of both HIV and blindness are known to have an adverse impact on society. The purpose of this paper is to present the status of HIV in India and to look at the possible confluence of effect of both HIV and blindness in relation to social factors and economic consequences.


  Magnitude of HIV/AIDS in India Top


Human immunodeficiency virus/AIDS was first recognized in India in 1986. [3],[4] India harbors the world's second largest burden of HIV-infected with one of every six new HIV infections occurring in India and two Indians becoming HIV-infected every minute. [5] The prevalence of HIV among Indian adults is 0.9%. [5] In 2005 India had 5.7 million persons living with HIV. [2] Though HIV is now seen across the country, 2/3 cases are in six States, [2] categorized as high-prevalence States. [6]


  Ocular involvement Top


Ocular complications are common in HIV/AIDS, affecting 50–75% of patients at some point during the course of illness. [7] Lifetime cumulative risk of at least one abnormal ocular lesion developing among HIV positives ranges from 52–100%. [8]

Mean duration of survival after diagnosis is 92 months in India. [9] Before the availability of antiretroviral therapy, median survival after diagnosis of AIDS was 12 to 18 months. [10] This has changed dramatically since the advent of highly active antiretroviral therapy. [11]

Available evidence suggests that presently the main cause of blindness in HIV is bilateral cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis. [7],[8],[12],[13],[14] Between 10–20% of HIV-infected patients can be expected to lose vision in one or both eyes as a result of ocular CMV infection. [13],[15]

Less frequent but important causes of bilateral vision loss include varicella zoster, herpes simplex retinitis, ischemic microvasculopathy, ocular syphilis, ocular tuberculosis, cryptococcal meningitis, and ocular toxic or allergic drug reactions. [13] At present, most patients with HIV/AIDS in developing countries losing vision have a limited life expectancy. [13],[16]


  Socioeconomic consequences Top


'Socioeconomic status' refers to the social and economic position of people within society. [17] Social indicators include education, health, employment status, housing conditions, access to services (water, sewerage, electricity among others) while economic indicators include income, wages, home ownership, asset possession, family income, percentage who did not receive medical treatment due to lack of money among others. [17]

People with lower literacy and from poor families have higher risk of HIV. [18] Poverty is higher among households affected by HIV/AIDS than among unaffected families. [19] For people already living in poverty, further income loss can threaten their ability to meet basic needs such as food. [19] Poverty also forces people to accept choices that put them at risk for HIV infection. Studies reveal that poor women are forced into sex work and into providing sexual favors in return for money, and to be less able to insist on condom use. [18],[20],[21]


  Human immunodeficiency virus and dwindling family assets Top


The most visible impact of HIV is on treatment expenses. Annual treatment costs of AIDS are unaffordable for poor patients. The median annual treatment costs of AIDS patients with opportunistic infections, including medications, travel, food and hospitalization were INR 13623.7. [22] This does not include costs of antiretroviral drugs (ARV), which substantially escalate the economic burden on families. Data from South India estimate median annual costs of treatment for AIDS patients to be INR 17606 with ARV. [22] Another study from Chennai observed that the median direct cost of treatment to a patient is INR 6000 per year while it is five times higher with antiretrovirals. [23] It has been estimated that the annual cost of HIV/AIDS to India is 1% of the GDP (gross domestic product). [24]

An immediate impact is on household earnings since HIV/AIDS affects individuals in their most productive years, from lost earnings during sickness or premature death. [23] Incomes in Indian families affected by HIV declined by a third, while average monthly expenditure on treatment increased substantially. [23] It has been shown that the life-years lost per case of HIV was 44.4 years in India leading to a productivity loss of INR 642,024 per case. [25] Considering national per capita income this translates to a loss of 98 billion INR which is far higher than the actual treatment costs. [25]


  Debts and borrowings to access services Top


Medical treatment expenditures constituted a significant economic burden on affected households, with a significant proportion of AIDS-related expenditures being financed by borrowings. [23] Studies have shown that high expenditure and low income characterizes AIDS-affected families. [19],[26] This therefore fuels increased borrowings.

To cope with loss of income and increased costs, households often deplete their savings, first using liquid assets and then selling off domestic investments such as livestock. [27] To avoid sale of more valuable resources like land or jewellery, debt is incurred. [27] This leads to a vicious cycle of social deprivation.


  Impact on other members of the family Top


Children and women are the worst sufferers in an AIDS-affected household. Fifteen million children have been orphaned by HIV/AIDS worldwide who are at an increased risk of malnutrition, illness, abuse, and sexual exploitation. [28] Households compromise on their children's education and force them into early employment to manage household expenses, [29],[30] which become worse after an AIDS-related death in the family. [29] There is evidence of married women being blamed and socially ostracized. [30],[31],[32]

Social stigma leads to loss of employment and education. Due to stigma and discrimination at the workplace many people living with HIV/ AIDS do not disclose their status for fear of losing jobs. [33]

There have been numerous reports about episodes of violence and discrimination towards adults and children with HIV, reflecting significant stigmatization of HIV-positives in our society. [5] Stigma and marginalization result in low self-esteem among patients. [27]


  Psychosocial impact of HIV-associated blindness Top


In both HIV and blindness, a psychosocial impact is prominent. Breakdown of familial relationships is possible in both. The blind face a loss of self-esteem due to familial neglect [34] and this is compounded if the person is HIV-positive. [27] They become isolated from the daily routine of the community and encounter severe depression and helplessness. [34] Blindness is associated with a marked loss of economic independence and social standing together with marginalization of the blind in the family decision-making process. [35] This loss of productivity leads to deterioration in the quality of life. Human immunodeficiency virus also significantly affects all these factors and therefore this combination leads to a rapidly progressing downward spiral.

In addition to ocular HIV, other blinding conditions will also coexist among HIV-positives. Normally, cataract blind report barriers like cost of service, distance to a facility, lack of an escort among others. [36],[37] The social ostracism of HIV-positives will compound these barriers. Many may refrain from accessing services in the fear of their HIV status being revealed. Therefore many of them will die blind. Even where they do come for surgery, there may be reluctance on the part of the surgeon to operate.

The lack of social security or health insurance schemes adds to the plight of the blind HIV-positive. The substantial cost of ARV may make it impossible for the blind to afford surgery. Because of their social isolation, it is difficult to get them into regular 'screening-service networks'.

Both HIV/AIDS and blindness are poverty-related diseases. They are both the cause and consequence of considerable poverty. Both are responsible for 'social drift' wherein affected people quickly move down the social ladder due to social ostracism and loss of employment. It is also known that disabled people are at a greater risk of HIV and at not being able to access available health facilities. The combined effect of HIV/AIDS and blindness can act as a disastrous cocktail on the socioeconomic fabric and the civic society should be sensitized to the Right to Dignity and Sight of the affected millions.

 
  References Top

1.
Mahal A, Rao B. HIV-AIDS epidemic in India: An economic perspective. Indian J Med Res 2005;121:582-600.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
2.
UNAIDS. AIDS epidemic update: Special report on HIV-AIDS 2006. Geneva (Switzerland): UNAIDS; 2006.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
John TJ, Babu PG, Jayakumari H, Simoes EA. Prevalence of HIV infection among risk groups in Tamilnadu, India. Lancet 1987;1:160-1.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]    
4.
Simoes EA, Babu PG, John TJ, Nirmala S, Solomon S, Lakshinarayana CS, et al . Evidence for HTLV-III infection in prostitutes in Tamil Nadu (India). Indian J Med Res 1987;85:335-8.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Bollinger RC. Stop AIDS-keep the promise. Indian J Med Res 2005;121:209-10.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
6.
Nacoonline.org. New Delhi. National AIDS Control Organization. An Overview of the Spread and Prevalence of HIV/AIDS in India [updated on 2006 Aug 22]; [cited on 2007 Mar 3]. Available from: http://www.nacoonline.org/facts_overview.htm.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Vrabec TR. Posterior segment manifestations of HIV-AIDS. Surv Ophthalmol 2004;49:131-57.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
8.
Biswas J. Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and the eye. J Assoc Physicians India 2001;49:551-7.  Back to cited text no. 8
[PUBMED]    
9.
Kumarasamy N, Solomon S, Flanigan TP, Hemalatha R, Thyagarajan SP, Mayer KH. Natural history of human immunodeficiency virus disease in southern India. Clin Infect Dis 2003;36:79-85.  Back to cited text no. 9
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
10.
Mocroft A, Johnson MA, Philips AN. Factors affecting survival in patients with acquired immune deficiency syndrome. AIDS 1996;10:1057-65.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Kumarasamy N, Vallabhaneni S, Flanigan TP, Mayer KH, Solomon S. Clinical profile of HIV in India. Indian J Med Res 2005;121:377-94.  Back to cited text no. 11
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
12.
Kempen JH, Jabs DA, Wilson LA, Dunn JP, West SK, Tonascia JA. Risk of vision loss in patients with cytomegalovirus retinitis and the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Arch Ophthalmol 2003;121:466-76.  Back to cited text no. 12
[PUBMED]    
13.
Kestelyn PG, Cunningham ET Jr. HIV-AIDS and blindness. Bull World Health Organ 2001;79:208-13.  Back to cited text no. 13
[PUBMED]    
14.
Robinson MR, Ross ML, Whitcup SM. Ocular manifestations of HIV infection. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 1999;10:431-7.  Back to cited text no. 14
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
15.
Biswas J, Madhavan HN, George AE, Kumarasamy N, Soloman S. Ocular lesions associated with HIV infection in India: A series of 100 consecutive patients evaluated at a referral center. Am J Ophthalmol 2000;129:9-15.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Cunningham ET Jr, Margolis TP. Ocular manifestations of HIV infection. N Engl J Med 1998;339:236-44.  Back to cited text no. 16
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
17.
Gilbride SJ, Wild C, Wilson DR, Svenson LW, Spady DW. Socio-economic status and types of childhood injury in Alberta: A population based study. BMC Pediatr 2006;6:30.  Back to cited text no. 17
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
18.
Tran TM, Nguyen HT, Yatsuya H, Hamajima, Nishimura A, Ito K. HIV prevalence and factors associated with HIV infection among male injection drug users under 30s: A cross sectional study in Long An, Vietnam. BMC Public Health 2006;6:248.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Bachmann MO, Booysen FL. Health and economic impact of HIV-AIDS on South African households: A cohort study. BMC Public Health 2003;3:14.  Back to cited text no. 19
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
20.
Dunkle KL, Jewkes RK, Brown HC, Gray GE, McIntyre JA, Harlow SD. Transactional sex among women in Soweto, South Africa: Prevalence, risk factors and association with HIV infection. Soc Sci Med 2004;59:1581-92.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Buckingham RW, Moraros J, Bird Y, Meister E, Webb NC. Factors associated with condom use among brothel-based female sex workers in Thailand. AIDS Care 2005;17:640-7.  Back to cited text no. 21
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
22.
John KR, Rajagopalan N, Madhuri KV. Economic comparison of opportunistic infection management with antiretroviral treatment in people living with HIV-AIDS presenting at an NGO clinic in Bangalore, India. Med Gen Med 2006;1:24  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Duraisamy P, Ganesh A, Homan R, Kumarasamy N, Castle C, Sripriya P, et al . Costs and financial burden of care and support services to PLHA and households in South India. AIDS Care 2006;18:121-7.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Anand K, Pandav CS, Nath LM. Impact of HIV-AIDS on the national economy of India. Health Policy 1999;47:195-205.  Back to cited text no. 24
[PUBMED]    
25.
Pandav CS, Anand K, Shamanna BR, Chowdhury S, Nath LM. Economic consequences of HIV-AIDS in India. Natl Med J India 1997;10:27-30.  Back to cited text no. 25
[PUBMED]    
26.
Bachmann MO, Booysen FL. Economic causes and effects of AIDS in South African households. AIDS 2006;20:1861-7.  Back to cited text no. 26
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
27.
Gooding K. Poverty and blindness: A survey of literature.1 st ed. Haywards Heath (UK): Sight Savers International; 2006.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Hecht R, Alban A, Taylor K, Post S, Andersen NB, Schwarz R. Putting it together: AIDS and the millennium development goals. PLoS Med 2006;3:e455.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Evans DK, Miguel E. Orphans and schooling in Africa: A longitudinal analysis. Demography 2007;44:35-57.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Mawar N, Sahay S, Pandit A, Mahajan U. The third phase of HIV pandemic: Social consequences of HIV-AIDS stigma and discrimination and future needs. Indian J Med Res 2005;122:471-84.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Gielen AC, O'Campo P, Faden RR, Eke A. Women's disclosure of HIV status: Experiences of mistreatment and violence in an urban setting. Women Health 1997;25:19-31.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Lester P, Partridge JC, Chesney MA, Cooke M. The consequences of a positive prenatal HIV antibody test for women. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol 1995;10:341-9.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Mehendale SM, Rodrigues JJ, Brookmeyer RS, Gangakhedkar RR, Divekar AD, Gokhale MR, et al . Incidence and predictors of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 seroconversion in patients attending sexually transmitted disease clinics in India. J Infect Dis 1995;172:1486-91.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Angra SK, Murthy GV, Gupta SK, Angra V. Cataract related blindness in India and its social implications. Indian J Med Res 1997;106:312-24.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Venkataswamy G. Social consequences of cataract blindness. Commun Eye Health 1990;3:6-7.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Vaidyanathan K, Limburg H, Foster A, Pandey RM. Changing trends to barriers in cataract surgery in India. Bull World Health Organ 1999;77:104-9.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Fletcher AE, Donoghue M, Devavaram J, Thulasiraj RD, Scott S, Abdalla M, et al . Low uptake of eye services in rural India: A challenge for programmes of blindness prevention. Arch Ophthalmol 1999;117:1393-9.  Back to cited text no. 37
    



This article has been cited by
1 Cytomegalovirus retinitis associated with HIV in resource-constrained settings: systematic screening and case detection
Sophia Pathai,Stephen D. Lawn,Clare Gilbert
International Health. 2012; 4(2): 86
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Evaluation of Ocular Manifestations and Blindness in HIV/AIDS Patients in a Tertiary Care Hospital in South India
Sunil Ganekal,Vishal Jhanji,Syril Dorairaj,Ashwini Nagarajappa
Ocular Immunology and Inflammation. 2012; 20(5): 336
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Prevalence of HIV-associated ophthalmic disease among patients enrolling for antiretroviral treatment in India: A cross-sectional study
Pathai, S., Deshpande, A., Gilbert, C., Lawn, S.D.
BMC Infectious Diseases. 2009; 9: 158
[Pubmed]
4 Human immunodeficiency virus and the ophthalmologist
Soman, R., Purandare, B.
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology. 2008; 56(5): 355-356
[Pubmed]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Abstract
Magnitude of HIV...
Human immunodefi...
Debts and borrow...
Impact on other ...
Psychosocial imp...
Ocular involvement
Socioeconomic co...
References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2793    
    Printed50    
    Emailed2    
    PDF Downloaded368    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 4    

Recommend this journal