|Year : 2008 | Volume
| Issue : 6 | Page : 475-480
Indirect optic nerve injury in two-wheeler riders in northeast India
Harsha Bhattacharjee, Kasturi Bhattacharjee, Lokesh Jain, Gitumoni Sarma, Angshuman Sen Sarma, Jnanankar Medhi, Dipankar Das, Sanjoy Kr Buragohain
Sri Sankaradeva Nethralaya, Beltola, Guwahati, Assam, India
|Date of Submission||26-May-2007|
|Date of Acceptance||03-Jun-2008|
|Date of Web Publication||14-Oct-2008|
Sri Sankaradeva Nethralaya, Beltola, Guwahati - 781 028, Assam
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Purpose: To investigate the association of posterior indirect traumatic optic neuropathy and superior temporal orbital rim injury in two-wheeler riders and documentation of the clinical profile of such cases.
Design: Retrospective observational study.
Materials and Methods: Records of all patients reporting with cranio-orbital injury and vision loss following road traffic accidents between October 1994 and April 2006 were reviewed and from them cases with vision loss solely from indirect optic nerve injury were taken up for study. The prognostic significance of different presenting features, role of intravenous methyl prednisolone (IVMP) and relative risk of superior orbital rim injury to posterior indirect traumatic optic neuropathy (at 95% confidence interval) was calculated.
Results: Out of 129 consecutive cases of cranio-orbital injury, 35 had posterior indirect traumatic optic neuropathy with minor ipsilateral superior temporal orbital rim trauma and none used any protective headwear. Presenting clinical features like relative afferent pupillary defect ( P = 0.365), optic disc status ( P = 0.518) and visual evoked potential (VEP) ( P = 0.366) were disproportionate to visual loss. Only VEP had prognostic significance. The IVMP did not provide any added therapeutic benefit. The remaining 94 cases sustained direct blinding ocular trauma and 28 of them had associated intracranial pathology. The relative risk of superior temporal orbital rim injury to posterior indirect optic nerve trauma was 2.25.
Conclusion: Superior temporal orbital rim injury, even when minor, carries a potential risk for development of blindness from indirect posterior indirect traumatic optic neuropathy in two-wheeler drivers. Presenting signs do not correlate with visual status. Only VEP has prognostic significance and the condition is untreatable.
Keywords: Orbital rim injury, posterior indirect traumatic optic neuropathy, protective headwear, two-wheeler
|How to cite this article:|
Bhattacharjee H, Bhattacharjee K, Jain L, Sarma G, Sarma AS, Medhi J, Das D, Buragohain SK. Indirect optic nerve injury in two-wheeler riders in northeast India. Indian J Ophthalmol 2008;56:475-80
|How to cite this URL:|
Bhattacharjee H, Bhattacharjee K, Jain L, Sarma G, Sarma AS, Medhi J, Das D, Buragohain SK. Indirect optic nerve injury in two-wheeler riders in northeast India. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2008 [cited 2020 May 31];56:475-80. Available from: http://www.ijo.in/text.asp?2008/56/6/475/43367
Posterior indirect traumatic optic neuropathy and visual system injury is a serious and infrequently found condition where treatment is controversial and permanent visual loss is almost evident. ,,,, It can occur following an innocent ipsilateral injury over the superior temporal orbital rim and is characterized by vision loss without external or internal ophthalmic evidences of injury to the eye and its nerve.  Posterior indirect traumatic optic neuropathy is seen in up to 5% of all the cases of closed head trauma , and only a few series of such reports are available in the literature. ,, In India it is estimated that over 500,000 people suffer from some form of head trauma every year and even if a 2% incidence is considered, over 10,000 of them will develop posterior indirect optic nerve trauma and severe visual loss. Till the treatment is known, identification of risk factors and prevention will have a considerable role to play in its management. The aim of the study was to evaluate the profile of posterior indirect traumatic optic nerve neuropathy in two-wheeler riders with injury over the superior temporal orbital rim, in the northeastern part of our country.
| Materials and Methods|| |
A retrospective study was conducted at a tertiary eye care center, where case records of 129 consecutive patients presenting with history of accidental forehead injury and vision loss occurring between October 1994 and April 2006 in two-wheeler riders following road traffic accidents (RTA) were reviewed. The association of cranio-orbital injury and vision loss due to indirect optic nerve injury was investigated. The cases reporting were divided into patients with posttraumatic vision loss due to any organic ocular etiology and associated unconsciousness and neurological pathology (Group I) and those with ipsilateral vision loss without ocular injury following outer orbital rim injury, without any associated unconsciousness and neurological pathology (Group II). The cases in Group I were excluded at the very beginning. The Group II cases were taken up for further analysis in this study and three aspects were analyzed in detail - viz.- i) Clinical presentation and its relation to visual loss, ii) investigation with predictor value in visual loss and iii) response to any treatment received. Being a tertiary eye care hospital, the patients have reported at different periods of time interval from the injury either for a second opinion or after being referred by the primary attending consultant . Thirty-five cases were included for the present study as per the following inclusion criteria. The set institutional diagnostic criteria for posterior indirect traumatic optic neuropathy were decreased or total loss of vision following closed head trauma, with various grades of relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD) at presentation, normal or optic disc pallor and positive Visual Evoked Potential (VEP) findings. Recommended investigations were VEP, high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the orbit, and brain.
Institutional trauma scheme for examination, investigation and follow-up of such cases was, recording of detailed clinical history, including mode of injury, treatment received elsewhere for trauma and vision loss, preexisting ocular condition, conventional ocular examination and neuro-ophthalmological evaluation with special emphasis on visual acuity, color vision, pupillary size, direct, consensual and accommodative pupillary reaction, and swing flash test and RAPD grading, dilated fundus examination including optic disc study and its comparison to other eye. Before diagnosis of posterior traumatic indirect optic neuropathy, fictitious amblyopia, previously undiagnosed ocular pathology and any neuropathology were excluded. Investigation schedule was recording of VEP, visual field, HRCT and MRI. The RAPD grading that was followed was Grade I; a weak initial constriction and greater redilatation, Grade II; initial still and greater redilatation, Grade III; immediate pupillary dilatation, Grade IV; immediate pupillary dilatation following prolonged illumination of the good eye for 6 sec and Grade V; immediate pupillary dilation with no secondary constriction. Follow-up protocol was from Day one of the injury, repeated examination every 48 h for the first week, weekly for one month, monthly for three months, every three months for one year then yearly thereafter with provision of lateral entry at any stage. The findings from the reviewed documents were recorded in the proforma of the study. Minimum time interval for primary analysis of a case in this study was three months. The relative risk (RR) of superior temporal orbital rim injury to posterior indirect traumatic optic neuropathy and its 95% confidence interval in the study were calculated. The statistical significance of the RAPD, optic disc status and with that of the initial visual acuity was calculated by student's t test and their prognostic significance was analyzed. Statistical calculation was done using Microsoft Excel and Statistical Software.
| Results|| |
Case records of 129 consecutive cases of cranio-orbital injury were reviewed. Out of them 35 cases with superior temporal orbital rim injury over the eyebrow and vision loss-associated posterior indirect traumatic optic neuropathy, fulfilling the criteria were included in the study [Table 1]. Thirty-two patients were male (91%) and three were female (9%) with an average age of 39 years (age range 10-63 years) [Figure 1]. Right and left laterality of the injury was 11 (31%) and 23 (69%) respectively. Site of injury was typically located on the ipsilateral superior temporal orbital rim over eyebrow at the extreme lateral end. Horizontal or vertical cut [Figure 2], black eye, edema, abrasion alone or in combination was the presenting nature of the wound. In selected cases, circumstances leading to injury were accidental without any vehicular collision and the drivers were in casual mode driving without using any protective headwear. Majority of them skidded and fell due to unfavorable road conditions. Eleven of them received first aid and all could drive back home or went to their destinations and considered the matter very minor and felt no necessity for any ophthalmology consultation. The remaining 94 cases had history of vehicular collision. All had some form of direct ocular injury accounting for visual loss [Table 2]. Twenty-eight cases out of them were unconscious and were under neurological intensive care for a variable period of time after the accident and 13 cases of them had residual non-visual neurological defect also. Incidentally, except seven, the rest (n=87) of the cases were using protective headwear during driving. The most interesting fact observed in the study was that medial superior orbital rim injuries were not associated with posterior indirect traumatic optic neuropathy [Figure 3]. The relative risk (RR) of superior temporal orbital rim injury to posterior indirect traumatic optic neuropathy was 2.25 and its 95% confidence interval (CI) was 1.25 - 4.04 in this study.
Presenting clinical features of the cases (selected for the study) were as follows. Only three patients reported within five days following injury and the mean interval between injury and the presentation was 37.26 days [Table 1] and one case presented as late as 180 days. Delayed presentation was due to the relatively trivial nature of the injury and had usually received initial treatment elsewhere. Visual acuity ranged from no perception of light in 12 (34%) cases to 20/30 in one (3%) case [Figure 4]. All had abnormality in pupillary status. The RAPD grading was Grade IV - 29 (83%) cases, Grade I - 4 (11%) cases, Grade II - 2 (6%) cases; however Grade III and Grade V RAPD were not found in any cases.
Variable amount of optic disc changes was found. It revealed generalized pallor in 23 (66%) cases, normal disc appearance in five (14%), temporal pallor in four (11%) cases, primary looking optic atrophy in two (6%) cases, doubtful pallor in one (3%) case, hyperemic disc in one (3%) case. All cases with normal disc appearance reported within 14 days of injury but detectable disc pallor was there on 10 th day post injury also. The exact time of onset of the disc changes could not be ascertained from the study.
Flash VEP of the affected eye showed an extinguished and flat response in 21 (60%) cases ( one had extinguished response even for 16 x 16, 32 x 32, 64 x 64 ), reduced amplitude in seven (20 %) cases, increased latency in six (17 %) cases and normal response was seen in one (3 %) case.
The HRCT and MRI of the cases did not reveal any abnormal findings, except in two cases- one had hairline fracture in the orbital plate of the frontal bone and the other had diffused swelling of the optic nerve [Figure 5].
Records showed that 18 cases received intravenous methyl prednisolone (IVMP) (1000 mg daily for three consecutive days) at random of which two cases improved to best corrected visual acuity of 20/20 but still had temporal disc pallor during final checkup. Seventeen cases received no treatment but two of them showed similar improvement during the final checkup.
Significant visual recovery was observed in four cases (out of total seven cases with visual improvement) [Figure 4]. Out of these four cases, two cases had an extinguished response in VEP at presentation but still recovered to have a good visual acuity later on. Twenty of the 21 cases with extinguished response had poor or no final visual recovery. The patient, who had a hyperemic disc on presentation, regained maximum visual acuity of 20/20 on follow-up with a subnormal VEP. Three cases that had a good visual acuity on follow-up had temporal pallor of the optic disc and one case had a pale disc. Five cases that had a normal disc appearance had poor visual acuity at presentation with a delayed VEP response. These show no definite correlation between clinical features. The RAPD, optic disc status and VEP had no statistical significance (student's t) with presenting visual acuity ( P =0.365, P =518, P = 0.360 respectively). But the VEP finding was observed to be the only predictor for final visual recovery.
| Discussion|| |
Traumatic optic nerve damage after craniofacial injury was first described by Hippocrates. 
Indirect injury to the intra-canalicular part of the optic nerve following head trauma occurs as a result of transection of nerve fibers, interruption of blood supply or secondary hemorrhage and edema following shearing or avulsion of the nutrient vessels or by the pressure transmitted along the bone of the optic canal. ,,,,,,,
The present study revealed that automobile collisions may lead to life-threatening injury to two-wheeler drivers and associated visual loss in them is either due to organic damage to the eye in the form of open globe injury, vitreous hemorrhage etc. or injury to the intracranial part of the visual system [Table 2]. Accidental fall in the road from two-wheeler without any vehicular collision causes an injury, many a times trivial, over the superior temporal orbital rim in particular, if the rider does not use any proper protective helmet. When such civil accident occurs the rider reflexly grips the handle more firmly resulting in the unprotected head striking the road surface.The lateral aspect of the forehead (over the orbital rim) is the most vulnerable point of such injury. All 35 cases of the present study had injury over the lateral (temporal) aspect of the eyebrow. Similar findings were observed in the International Optic Nerve Trauma Study.  Lessell  found that the commonest mode of such an injury was fall from bicycle, closely followed by automobile collision. However, similar indirect optic nerve injury is also possible following a blow to the face, forehead or less commonly to the temple. , Analysis of circumstances leading to such accidents revealed that the minor accidents were due to bad road condition and none of the riders were using a protective helmet at that time of the accident. Absence of indirect optic nerve injury in helmet user indicates it protective role. All cases of indirect optic nerve injury in helmet users had associated head injury indicating very severe impact.
The HRCT and MRI of the orbit and head were negative in all of our cases except two who had orbital roof fracture and diffuse thickening of the optic nerve. So the exact mechanism of optic nerve injury in the present series of cases remained ill understood. Lessell found craniofacial fracture in 17 of 33 imaged cases, and seven had fracture intersecting the optic canal. But neither the presence nor the location of a fracture correlated with the severity of the optic neuropathy.  Posterior indirect traumatic optic neuropathy occurs predominantly in young males but can occur in both sexes and all ages.  In our series a similar finding was observed where mostly males were affected.
In the absence of a prospective randomized study, the diagnostic role of different devices and management strategies remain controversial. A RAPD defect in all the cases is the sine qua non of an optic neuropathy, so also visual loss, and optic disc findings. The optic disc appears normal up to two weeks and thereafter, variable changes occur. But the RAPD ( P = 0.365), optic disc status ( P = 0.518) and VEP ( P =0.366) were not found significant in reference to visual acuity at presentation.
No response to flash stimulation was the commonest VEP finding. Reduced amplitude in some cases and increased latency in others suggest that ischemic/compressive and subsequent demyelization may be the underlying pathology responsible for indirect trauma to the optic nerve following such injury to the superior orbital rim. In our study, 20 of the 21 cases with extinguished VEP at initial presentation had poor final vision. Nau et al. , retrospectively analyzed VEP in 14 patients and found the usefulness of an absent VEP in predicting a poor visual outcome.  They, however, failed to establish a good correlation between positive VEP and good visual recovery. A similar observation was made in the present study also. Thus our study concludes that VEP is the single important predictor for final visual outcome but may not be the only clinical and investigative feature for visual prediction.
In our study 18% of the cases had variable and spontaneous visual improvement in reference to the presenting vision during final checkup. However, the literature shows that spontaneous recovery rate is 25-55%. ,,, Despite an abundance of literature on the subject, controversy exists regarding medical and surgical management of patients with posterior indirect optic nerve injuries. ,,,,, We could not find any obvious benefit of IVMP in management of such cases as observed in the International Optic Nerve Trauma Study. 
Most of our cases in this study presented over a varied period following injury because of its trivial nature, ignoring the fact that it might cause grave visual prognosis in due course of time. There were cases where the injury was so minor that there was no external evidence, but the visual loss was up to negative perception of light. The RR of superior temporal orbital rim injury to posterior indirect traumatic optic neuropathy is 2.25 and its CI is 1.25- 4.04 in this study.
| Conclusion|| |
Superior temporal orbital rim injury even when minor carries a potential risk for development of indirect posterior indirect traumatic optic neuropathy and blindness in two-wheeler riders. Presenting signs do not correlate with visual status and VEP showed significance as a prognosis predictor. The condition is untreatable but can be prevented by using protective headgear.
| Acknowledgment|| |
Financial Support from Sri Kanchi Sankara Health and Educational Foundation, Mr. Ratan Kalita for the statistical analysis, Mr. Akshay Chandra Deka for preparing the diagrams.
| References|| |
Levin LA, Beck RW, Joseph MP, Seiff S, Kraker R. The treatment of traumatic optic neuropathy. Ophthalmology 1999;106:1268-77.
Kline LB, Morawetz RB, Swaid SN. Indirect injury of the optic nerve. Neurosurgery 1984;14:756-44.
Kallera I, Hyrkas T, Paukku P, Iizuka T, Lindqvist C. Blindness after Maxillofacial blunt trauma. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1994;22:220-5.
Lessell S. Indirect optic nerve trauma. Arch Ophthalmol 1989;107:382-6.
Steinsapir KD, Goldberg RA. Traumatic optic neuropathy. Surv Ophthalmol 1994;38:487-518.
Walsh FB, Hoyt WF. Clinical neuro-ophthalmology. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1969. p. 2375.
Mahapatra AK, Tandon DA. Optic nerve injury: A study of 250 patients. In: Smil M, editor. Skull base anatomy, Radiology and treatment. Basel: S Karger; 1994. p. 305-9.
Fukado Y. Microsurgical trans- ethmoidal optic canal decomposition: Experience in 700 cases. In: Smil M, Jenetta D, editors. The cranial nerves. New York: Springer Verlag; 1981. p. 125-8.
Fujitani T, Inoue K, Takahashi T, Ikushima K, Asai T. Indirect traumatic optic neuropathy, visual outcome of operative and non-operative cases. Jpn J Ophthalmol 1986;30:125-34.
Chandwick J, Mann WN. The medical works of Hippocrates. Oxford: England, Backwell; 1950.
Anderson RL, Panje WR, Gross CE. Optic nerve blindness following blunt forehead trauma, Ophthalmology 1982;89:445-55.
Leonard A. The traumatic optic neuropathy. Ophthalmology 1999;106:7.
Pringle JH. Atrophy of the optic nerve following diffuse violence to the skull. Br Med J 1922;2:1156-7.
Hughes B. Indirect injury to the optic nerves and chaisma. Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp 1962;111:98-126.
Albert, Jacobeic. Neuro ophthalmic manifestations of trauma, Principles and practice of ophthalmology. 2nd ed. p. 6, 378, 5266-76.
Ramsay JH. Optic nerve injury in fracture of the skull. Pract Ophthalmol 1979;63:607-10.
Mahapatra AK. Bilateral optic nerve injury. Neurol India 1999;47:92-3.
Nau HE, Gerhad L, Focrster M, Nahser HC, Reinhardt V, Joka T. Optic nerve trauma: Clinical, electrophysiological and histological remarks. Acta Neurochis 1989;89:16- 27.
Seiff SR. Trauma and the optic nerve. Ophthalmol Clin North Am 1992;5:389-94.
Fukado Y. Results of 350 cases of surgical decompression of the optic nerve. Trans Ophthalmol Soc NZ 1975;25:96-9.
Fukado Y. Results in 400 cases of surgical decompression of the optic nerve. Mod Probl Ophthalmol 1975;14:474-81.
Joseph MP, Lessell S, Rizzo J, Momose KJ. Extra cranial optic nerve decompression for traumatic neuropathy. Arch Ophthalmol 1990;108:1091-3.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5]
[Table 1], [Table 2]
|This article has been cited by|
||The Pavagada Pediatric Eye Disease Study: Objectives, Methodology and Participant Characteristics
| ||Vasudha Kemmanu,Kaushik Hegde,Smitha Devagirkar,Chandrakant Pujar,Bhujang K. Shetty,G. Kumaramanickavel,Catherine A. McCarty |
| ||Ophthalmic Epidemiology. 2013; 20(3): 176 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Update on diagnosis and management of Descemet's membrane detachment
| ||Vanissa Wing See Chow,Tushar Agarwal,Rasik B. Vajpayee,Vishal Jhanji |
| ||Current Opinion in Ophthalmology. 2013; 24(4): 356 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Long-term follow-up of changes in corneal endothelium after primary and secondary intraocular lens implantations in children
| ||Mi Jeung Kim, Jeong Hun Kim, Seong-Joon Kim, Young Suk Yu |
| ||Graefe s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology. 2011; |
|[VIEW] | [DOI]|