Glyxambi
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 911
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

   Table of Contents      
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Year : 2010  |  Volume : 58  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 83

Evaluation of medical college departments of ophthalmology in India


Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, USA

Date of Web Publication22-Dec-2009

Correspondence Address:
Sohan Singh Hayreh
Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences College of Medicine University of Iowa Iowa City
USA
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0301-4738.58483

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Hayreh SS. Evaluation of medical college departments of ophthalmology in India. Indian J Ophthalmol 2010;58:83

How to cite this URL:
Hayreh SS. Evaluation of medical college departments of ophthalmology in India. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2010 [cited 2019 Nov 14];58:83. Available from: http://www.ijo.in/text.asp?2010/58/1/83/58483

Dear Editor,

I was interested to read comments by Gopal [1] about "Evaluation of medical college departments of ophthalmology in India", in the March-April 2009 issue. He rightly points out the roles of: (i) trainer, (ii) trainee, and (iii) equipment in the quality of training of ophthalmologists in India. I spent the first 34 years of my life in India - six of those as a faculty in a medical college, and have visited India from time to time since 1961 when I left India. Since leaving India, I have been on the medical faculties of the University of London, University of Edinburgh in Scotland, and now in the University of Iowa in the United States since 1973. Based on all this experience in India and abroad, I feel Gopal missed one important basic factor responsible for the problem: that is, to be appointed as either trainer or trainee in India, it is not uncommon to find that what matters most is "not what you know but whom you know". Unless and until that basic problem is resolved, and merit is the only standard for appointment, it seems hard to envision much improvement.

 
  References Top

1.
Santhan Gopal KS. Evaluation of medical college departments of ophthalmology in India. Indian J Ophthalmol 2009;57:159-60  Back to cited text no. 1
    



This article has been cited by
1 As a member of the All India Ophthalmological Society
Gopal, K.S.S.
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology. 2010; 58(5): 452-453
[Pubmed]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1411    
    Printed42    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded264    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal