• Users Online: 70296
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

   Table of Contents      
LETTER TO EDITOR
Year : 2010  |  Volume : 58  |  Issue : 6  |  Page : 553-554

Authors' reply


1 Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba 260-8670; Department of Ophthalmology, Institute of Health Biosciences, The University of Tokushima Graduate School, 3-18-15 Kuramoto, Tokushima 770-8503, Japan
2 Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba 260-8670, Japan

Date of Web Publication16-Oct-2010

Correspondence Address:
Yoshinori Mitamura
Department of Ophthalmology, Institute of Health Biosciences, The University of Tokushima Graduate School, 3-18-15 Kuramoto, Tokushima 770-8503
Japan
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Mitamura Y, Kitahashi M, Kubota-Taniai M, Yamamoto S. Authors' reply. Indian J Ophthalmol 2010;58:553-4

How to cite this URL:
Mitamura Y, Kitahashi M, Kubota-Taniai M, Yamamoto S. Authors' reply. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2010 [cited 2024 Mar 29];58:553-4. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/ijo/pages/default.aspx/text.asp?2010/58/6/553/71693

Dear Editor,

We appreciate the comments by Chhablani [1] regarding our article. [2] The best treatment for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) has still not been established. Our results suggest that photodynamic therapy (PDT) may be more effective than intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) shortly after treatment for PCV. However, we did not evaluate the efficacy of intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR). Ranibizumab is a smaller molecule than bevacizumab, and the penetration of ranibizumab into the subretinal pigment epithelium space might be better than that of bevacizumab. As mentioned in our article, further studies to evaluate the efficacy of other anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents and combination therapy of PDT and anti-VEGF agents are required and ongoing.

In reply to the first comment "it might be difficult to treat multiple widely distributed lesions with a single beam of PDT," we usually treat polyps in and around the macula with a single beam of PDT and other remote lesions are not treated or treated using direct photocoagulation. Tsujikawa et al. [3] reported that such remote lesions have only a minor effect on the visual outcome.

With respect to the second comment "it can be difficult to treat polyps in the peripapillary area with PDT," no eye had polyps around the disc in this study. Especially in Asians, the peripalliary PCV was reported to be rare as compared with macular PCV. [3]

In reply to the third comment, we know that large submacular hemorrhage due to PCV cannot be treated with PDT. We usually treat PCV with large submacular hemorrhage using intravitreal gas injection followed by PDT or IVB, and such cases were not included in this study.

With respect to the fourth comment, we know that repeated PDT may lead to choroidal damage. However, it has been reported that PDT combined with IVR in an animal model did not adversely affect the recanalization of the choriocapillaris as compared with PDT alone, [4] suggesting that choroidal damage due to PDT may be reduced by combining with it. Ruamviboonsuk et al. [5] reported that there was no permanent nonperfusion affecting choriocapillaris after the combination therapy of PDT and IVR. Sato et al. [6] reported that the combination therapy of PDT and IVB may reduce the retreatment rate and the occurrence of subsequent submacular hemorrhage as compared with PDT monotherapy. As for other adverse events, retinal pigment epithelial tear can occur not only after PDT but also after IVB. [7]

In reply to the comment "considering the economic burden associated with PDT," continuous monthly IVR is more expensive than PDT. Most recently, it has been reported that combination therapy of PDT and IVR for PCV showed encouraging results concerning visual acuity (VA), incidence of subretinal hemorrhage, and recurrence of polyps. [5] VA improvement 6 months after IVR was reported to be 7.2 letters, [8] but VA improvement after combination therapy of PDT and IVR was 11.6 letters. [5] Kokame et al. [8] described that visual outcomes of IVR monotherapy for PCV may be worse than those for exudative age-related macular degeneration. Taken together, we disagree with the comment "anti-VEGF drugs alone could be the preferred treatment for symptomatic PCV."

 
  References Top

1.
Chhabalani JK. Disadvantages of photodynamic therapy for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. Indian J Ophthalmol 2010;58:552-3.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Mitamura Y, Kitahashi M, Kubota-Taniai M, Yamamoto S. Comparison of intravitreal bevacizumab to photodynamic therapy for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy: Short-term results. Indian J Ophthalmol 2010;58:291-6  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Tsujikawa A, Nakanishi H, Ojima Y, Iwama D, Tamura H, Otani A, et al. Macular polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy with a remote lesion. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2008;36:817-23.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
4.
Kim IK, Husain D, Michaud N, Connolly E, Lane AM, Durrani K, et al. Effect of intravitreal injection of ranibizumab in combination with verteporfin PDT on normal primate retina and choroid. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47:357-63.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
5.
Ruamviboonsuk P, Tadarati M, Vanichvaranont S, Hanutsaha P, Pokawattana N. Photodynamic therapy combined with ranibizumab for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy: Results of a 1-year preliminary study. Br J Ophthalmol online publication. 2010. [In Press].  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Sato T, Kishi S, Matsumoto H, Mukai R. Combined photodynamic therapy with verteporfin and intravitreal bevacizumab for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. Am J Ophthalmol 2010;149:947-54.  Back to cited text no. 6
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
7.
Peng CH, Cheng CK, Chiou SH. Retinal pigment epithelium tear after intravitreal bevacizumab injection for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. Eye 2009;23:2126-9.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
8.
Kokame GT, Yeung L, Lai JC. Continuous anti-VEGF treatment with ranibizumab for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy: 6-month results. Br J Ophthalmol 2010;94:297-301.  Back to cited text no. 8
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  




 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1921    
    Printed57    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded102    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal