Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 3535
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

   Table of Contents      
LETTER TO EDITOR
Year : 2010  |  Volume : 58  |  Issue : 6  |  Page : 554-555

Authors' reply


Neuro-Ophthalmology Service, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil

Date of Web Publication16-Oct-2010

Correspondence Address:
Frederico Castelo Moura
Pedroso Alvarenga, 1077, CEP: 04531-012, São Paulo, S.P.
Brazil
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Moura FC, Monteiro ML. Authors' reply. Indian J Ophthalmol 2010;58:554-5

How to cite this URL:
Moura FC, Monteiro ML. Authors' reply. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2010 [cited 2020 Jun 2];58:554-5. Available from: http://www.ijo.in/text.asp?2010/58/6/554/71695

Dear Editor,

We thank Ramchandani et al. [1] for the interest in our article [2] and for the opportunity to clarify some issues that were raised.

We completely agree that careful history and clinical examination including visual field testing is sufficient to make the diagnosis after excluding other causes with neuroimaging. Other tests such as optical coherence tomogram (OCT) and even visual evoked potential (VEP) are not necessary for diagnosis in such cases as well as in most visual pathways abnormalities. However, establishing that optic nerve fibers are still intact or permanently damaged is of great interest and has been the subject of extensive research in recent years. While visual acuity and field measurements indicate the presence of optic nerve dysfunction, quantification of axonal loss is interesting information that helps in predicting whether visual recovery is possible or unlikely to occur. Of course we can also grossly estimate axonal loss just by looking carefully at the retinal nerve fiber layer or even at the optic disc color. However, OCT provides an objective way of quantifying axonal loss not only in glaucoma but also in many other anterior optic pathway conditions. [3],[4] This is the whole point of evaluating the performance of OCT in different optic neuropathies. In some, structure-function relationship between fields and axonal loss seems to be adequate [5],[6] and OCT helps in predicting visual recovery after treatment. [7] In many others its performance is yet not well understood.

The purpose of our paper was to bring to the reader's attention the possible confusion that can occur when one uses OCT in tobacco-alcohol-induced toxic optic neuropathy. While the first two cases showed the expected pattern of axonal loss in the temporal side of the disc, Case 3 surprisingly did not demonstrate it. It is possible that the finding in Case 3 indicates a lack of sensitivity of OCT. We believe that it indicates that the development of retinal nerve fiber layer loss in this condition may take longer than we previously expected based on our experience with other conditions demonstrating retinal nerve fiber layer loss in the temporal side of the optic disc. [3] We believe it could also indicate that possible axonal loss may have been counterbalanced by nerve fiber edema (possible due to axoplasmic flow stasis). It is therefore important to emphasize that such a pattern can occur in order to avoid diagnostic confusion.

Although we understand that VEP may be helpful in many conditions, we agree that it is not specific and do not believe it is necessary for the diagnosis. We did not use it in any of these cases. We do not believe that the presence of edema should have any correspondence with arcuate scotomas since it is hard to know exactly what the enlargement of the retinal nerve fiber layer signifies.

In conclusion, our study had the purpose of investigating the possible use of OCT in tobacco-alcohol-induced toxic optic neuropathy to quantify axonal loss and to emphasize that if may fail in that regard as documented by one of our cases. We thank for the important observations and for the opportunity to further discuss the subject.

 
  References Top

1.
Ramchandani S. Evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurements using optical coherence tomography in patients with tobacco-alcohol-induced toxic optic neuropathy. Indian J Ophthalmol 2010;58:554.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
2.
Moura FC, Monteiro ML. Evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurements using optical coherence tomography in patients with tobacco-alcohol-induced toxic optic neuropathy. Indian J Ophthalmol 2010;58:143-6  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Moura FC, Medeiros FA, Monteiro ML. Evaluation of macular thickness measurements for detection of band atrophy of the optic nerve using optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmol 2007;114:175-81.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Klistorner A, Arvind H, Nguyen T, Garrick R, Paine M, Graham S, et al. Axonal loss and myelin in early ON loss in postacute optic neuritis. Ann Neurol 2008;64:325-31.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
5.
Danesh-Meyer HV, Carroll SC, Foroozan R, Savino PJ, Fan J, Jiang Y, et al. Relationship between retinal nerve fiber layer and visual field sensitivity as measured by optical coherence tomography in chiasmal compression. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47:4827-35.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
6.
Monteiro ML, Cunha LP, Costa-Cunha LV, Maia OO, Jr., Oyamada MK. Relationship between optical coherence tomography, pattern electroretinogram and automated perimetry in eyes with temporal hemianopia from chiasmal compression. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009;50:3535-41.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Jacob M, Raverot G, Jouanneau E, Borson-Chazot F, Perrin G, Rabilloud M, et al. Predicting visual outcome after treatment of pituitary adenomas with optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol 2009;147:64-70.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  




 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed739    
    Printed24    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded57    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal