Glyxambi
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 10315
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

   Table of Contents      
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Year : 2011  |  Volume : 59  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 326

Authors' reply


1 Department of Glaucoma, Pushpagiri Eye Institute, Marredpally, Secunderabad, India
2 Department of Biostatistics, National Institute of Nutrition, Hyderabad, India

Date of Web Publication11-Jun-2011

Correspondence Address:
Tarannum Mansoori
Department of Glaucoma, Pushpagiri Eye Institute, 241, Uma plaza, 10-2-342, Road No. 9, West Marredpally, Secunderabad - 500 026, Andhra Pradesh
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Mansoori T, Viswanath K, Balakrishna N. Authors' reply. Indian J Ophthalmol 2011;59:326

How to cite this URL:
Mansoori T, Viswanath K, Balakrishna N. Authors' reply. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2011 [cited 2019 Oct 22];59:326. Available from: http://www.ijo.in/text.asp?2011/59/4/326/82010

Dear Editor,

We thank Gundogan et al[1] for their interest and valuable comments in response to our article 'Optic disc topography in normal Indian eyes using spectral domain optical coherence tomography. [2]

Gundogan et al[1] mentioned that the article reports insignificant relations between the optic nerve head (ONH) area and the cup/disc ratio. However, we reported a significant positive correlation between the disc area and the cup/disc horizontal ratio, and the cup/disc vertical ratio and the cup/disc area ratio [Table 3]. [2]

We agree that the inclusion criteria of the study limited the refractive error within ± 3 diopter (D) for the sphere and within ±1.5 D for the cylinder. We appreciate that Gundogan et al[1] have given an excellent example of how limiting the numerical values into a narrow range may mask the significant correlation. We agree that if the values are limited in such a way, the number of the participants should be increased in order to increase the reliability of the results. In the [Table 1] given by Gundogan et al[1], group 3 has seven values for each variable instead of eight, and hence, the total number of values is 22 and not 23 as mentioned.

It has been reported that ONH is large in high myopic eyes and small in highly hyperopic eyes. [3] However, in eyes with moderate refractive error, the ONH size is mostly independent of the refractive error . [3]

Jonas et al. [4] reported that the optic disc size depends on the refractive error, with an increase in disc size in high myopic eyes beyond - 8 D and a decrease in high hyperopic eyes beyond + 4 D. In our study, the refractive error ranged between ± 3 D in the sphere and for this range of refraction, the optic disc area did not show statistically significant correlation with the refractive error. Also, it was clearly mentioned that further studies are needed to determine whether ONH parameters differ in high myopic and hyperopic eyes. [2]

 
  References Top

1.
Gundogan FC, Tas A, Sahin OF. Optýc dýsc topography ýn normal Indýan eyes usýng spectral domaýn optýcal coherence tomography. Indian J Ophthalmol 2011;59:325-6.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
2.
Mansoori T, Viswanath K, Balakrishna N. Optic disc topography in normal Indian eyes using spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Indian J Ophthalmol 2011;59:23-7.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
3.
Jonas JB, Budde WM, Panda-Jonas S. Ophthalmoscopic evaluation of the optic nerve head. Surv Ophthalmol 1999;43:293-320.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Jonas JB. Optic disk size correlated with refractive error. Am J Ophthalmol 2005;139:346-8.  Back to cited text no. 4
    




 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed451    
    Printed21    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded62    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal