|
|
BRIEF COMMUNICATION |
|
Year : 2011 | Volume
: 59
| Issue : 6 | Page : 514-516 |
|
Optimal dosage of cyclopentolate 1% for cycloplegic refraction in hypermetropes with brown irides
Kanwar Mohan1, Ashok Sharma2
1 Squint Centre, Chandigarh, India 2 Cornea Centre, Chandigarh, India
Date of Submission | 28-Apr-2010 |
Date of Acceptance | 03-Jan-2011 |
Date of Web Publication | 19-Oct-2011 |
Correspondence Address: Kanwar Mohan Squint Centre, SCO 833-834, 2nd Floor, Sector 22-A, Chandigarh - 160 022, Punjab India
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/0301-4738.86329
To find the optimal dosage of cyclopentolate 1% for cycloplegic refraction in hypermetropes with brown irides, we investigated the difference in cycloplegic auto-refractions obtained after one, two, and three instillations in the same patient. The mean hypermetropia found after three instillations was statistically significantly more compared to that found after one instillation. There was no statistically significant difference in the mean hypermetropia between two and three instillations. There was no significant effect of gender, age, and the presence and type of horizontal deviation. These observations suggest that two drops of cyclopentolate 1% 10 min apart are sufficient for cycloplegic refraction in hypermetropes. Keywords: Cyclopentolate, cycloplegic refraction, hypermetropia
How to cite this article: Mohan K, Sharma A. Optimal dosage of cyclopentolate 1% for cycloplegic refraction in hypermetropes with brown irides. Indian J Ophthalmol 2011;59:514-6 |
No consensus exists on the optimal dosage of cyclopentolate for cycloplegic refraction. [1],[2],[3],[4],[5],[6],[7],[8] It is important to study a multi-dosage approach to find out the lowest number of instillations of cyclopentolate required to produce adequate cycloplegia with minimum systemic side effects. Studies on the optimal dosage of cyclopentolate are few and have been conducted with two different dosage schedules in the same patient. [9],[10] There is no study with three different dosage schedules of cyclopentolate in the same patient. We believe that age, refractive error, iris pigmentation, and ocular deviation are the potential confounding variables with a possible effect on measured hypermetropia, as mentioned by Bagheri et al., [10] also. We also believe that using one, two, and three instillations of cyclopentolate in the same patient can eliminate these variables.
To find out the lowest and the optimal dosage of cyclopentolate for cycloplegic refraction, we compared hypermetropia found after one, two, and three instillations in the same patient with brown irides.
Materials and Methods | | |
This study included 51 hypermetropes (25 males and 26 females) with brown irides who attended the strabismus service, and were approved by our institutional review board. The age of the 51 patients ranged from 6 to 20 years (mean, 12.48 ± 3.76). A histogram of age is shown in [Figure 1]. A total of 41 (80%) patients had esotropia, 6 (12%) had exotropia, and 4 (8%) had orthophoria. All patients underwent auto-refraction (Huvitz MR-3100P, Korea) with cyclopentolate 1% first after instillation of one drop, 1 week later after instillation of two drops 10 min apart, and further 1 week later after instillation of three drops 10 min apart. Auto-refraction was performed after 60 min in patients with one instillation, after 50 min of the last drop in patients with two instillations, and after 40 min of the last drop in patients with three instillations. Thus all patients had auto-refraction after 60 min of the first instillation. The examiner was not blinded to the number of instillations received. The information was recorded on a separate proforma at each visit and the results of previous auto-refraction were not revealed to the examiner. Three measurements were taken and then the average was calculated. Ocular side effects of cyclopentolate including severe redness and itching, and systemic side effects including visual hallucinations, incoherent speech, ataxia, amnesia, or faulty orientation were recorded at each visit. Spherical equivalent refractive errors were documented. Wilcoxon's signed rank test was used to see the difference in the mean hypermetropia found after one, two, and three instillations of cyclopentolate 1%. The mean hypermetropia found after one, two, and three instillations of cyclopentolate was analyzed in relation to gender using the Mann-Whitney test, and using the Kruskal-Wallis test in relation to patient age and the type of squint. A P-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results | | |
[Table 1] presents the mean hypermetropia found in the right and left eyes after one, two, and three instillations of cyclopentolate 1%. Considering three instillations as our gold standard that is supposed to reveal the highest hypermetropia, we compared one and two instillations to three instillations. In the right and left eyes, the mean hypermetropia found after three instillations was significantly more compared to that found after one instillation (Z = -4.369; P = 0.0001 and Z = -3.959; P = 0.0001, respectively, Wilcoxon's signed rank test). There was no statistically significant difference in the mean hypermetropia between two and three instillations in both right and left eyes (Z = -1.032; P = 0.302 and Z = -1.170; P = 0.242, respectively, Wilcoxon's signed rank test). A difference of more than 0.5 D was seen in four eyes between one and two instillations, one eye between two and three instillations, and six eyes between one and three instillations. | Table 1: Hypermetropia found after one, two, and three instillations of cyclopentolate 1%
Click here to view |
The mean hypermetropia found after one, two, and three instillations of cyclopentolate 1% with respect to gender, age, and the type of squint is presented in [Table 2], [Table 3], and [Table 4], respectively. There was statistically no significant difference in the mean hypermetropia found after one, two, and three instillations of cyclopentolate 1% between male and female, among age groups 6-10, 11-15, and 16-20 years, and among esotropes, exotropes, and orthotropes. | Table 2: Mean hypermetropia found after one, two, and three instillations of cyclopentolate 1% with respect to gender
Click here to view |
| Table 3: Mean hypermetropia found after one, two, and three instillations of cyclopentolate 1% with respect to patient age
Click here to view |
| Table 4: Mean hypermetropia found after one, two, and three instillations of cyclopentolate 1% with respect to the type of squint
Click here to view |
None of our patients developed any ocular or systemic side effects of cyclopentolate after one, two, and three instillations.
Discussion | | |
Bagheri et al., [10] divided their patients into three groups and compared the cycloplegic effect of cyclopentolate 1% between one and two drops (Group 1), two and three drops (Group 2), and one and three drops (Group 3). They did not find a significant difference among these groups and concluded that a single drop of cyclopentolate was sufficient for cycloplegic refraction. In our study, though the mean difference in hypermetropia between one and three instillations was less than 0.25 D, this was still statistically significant. We did not find a significant difference in the mean hypermetropia between two and three instillations. These observations indicate that one instillation of cyclopentolate 1% does not cause adequate cycloplegia and is, therefore, insufficient for cycloplegic refraction in hypermetropes with brown irides. Furthermore, these observations also suggest that two instillations of cyclopentolate 1% are sufficient for cycloplegic refraction in hypermetropes with brown irides. Bagheri et al., [10] had various confounding variables (such as age, refractive error, iris pigmentation, and the presence and type of ocular deviation) equally distributed in the three groups and did not find a significant effect of these on refraction. We also did not find a significant effect of gender, age, and the presence and type of horizontal deviation on hypermetropia in our patients with brown irides. We believe that using different dosage schedules of cyclopentolate in the same patient and then comparing the refractive results is the best method for eliminating the influence of these variables, as done in this study.
Gadioux-Madern et al., [9] recorded the refractive results after the instillation of two drops of cyclopentolate 0.5% 10 min apart and three drops 5 min apart in the same patient in non-strabismic children. They concluded that the former schedule was as effective as the latter. However, in strabismic children, they recommended instillation of three drops. As our patients were enrolled from strabismus service and not from general ophthalmic practice, there were very few patients without strabismus. We did not find a significant effect of esotropia, exotropia, and orthophoria on hypermetropia detected after one, two, and three instillations of cyclopentolate 1% in the same patient.
Various drug complications after one, two, and three instillations of cyclopentolate 1% have been observed in 5%, 11%, and 25% of the patients, respectively. [10] We were surprised to find that none of our patients had any ocular or systemic side effects of cyclopentolate with all three dosage schedules.
Based on our observations in this study, we suggest two instillations of cyclopentolate 1% at a 10-min interval for cycloplegic refraction in hypermetropes with brown irides.
Acknowledgments | | |
The authors thank Dr. Suresh K. Sharma, Department of Statistics, Punjab University, Chandigarh, for performing statistical analysis of this study.
References | | |
1. | Manny RE, Fern KD, Zervas HJ, Cline GE, Scott SK, White JM, et al. 1% Cyclopentolate hydrochloride: Another look at the time course of cycloplegic using an objective measure of the accommodative response. Optom Vis Sci 1993;70:651-5. |
2. | Vitale A, Foster CS. Mydriatic and cycloplegic agents. In: Zimmerman TJ, Kooner K, Sharir M, Fechtner R, editors. Textbook of Ocular Pharmocology. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1997. p. 703-11. |
3. | Twelker JD, Mutti DO. Retinoscopy in infants using a near noncycloplegic technique, cycloplegia with tropicamide 1%, and cycloplegia with cyclopentolate 1%. Optom Vis Sci 2001;78:215-22. |
4. | Dale RT. Fundamentals of Ocular Motility and Strabismus. New York: Grune & Stratton; 1982. p. 191. |
5. | Repka MX. Refraction in infants and children. In: Nelson LB, editor. Harley's Pediatric Ophthalmology. 4 th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1998. p. 117-8. |
6. | Robb RM, Petersen RA. Cycloplegic refraction in children. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 1968;5:110-4. |
7. | Kawamoto K, Hayasaka S. Cycloplegic refraction in Japanese children: Comparison of atropine and cyclopentolate. Ophthalmologica 1997;211:57-60. |
8. | Celebi S, Aykan U. Comparison of cyclopentolate and atropine in patients with refractive accommodative esotropia by means of retinoscopy, autorefractometery and biometric lens thickness. Acta Ophthalmol 1999;77:426-9. |
9. | Gadioux-Madern F, Lelez ML, Sellami L, Santallier M, Fourquet F, Pisella PJ, et al. Influence of the instillation of two versus three eyedrops of cyclopentolate 0.5% on refraction of Caucasian nonstrabismic children. J Fr Ophtalmol 2008;31;51-5. |
10. | Bagheri A, Givrad S, Yazdani S, Reza Mohebbi M. Optimal dosage of cyclopentolate 1% for complete cycloplegia: A randomized clinical trial. Eur J Ophthalmol 2007;17:294-300. |
[Figure 1]
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]
This article has been cited by | 1 |
Ocular Cyclopentolate: A Mini Review Concerning Its Benefits and Risks |
|
| Homero Contreras-Salinas, Vanessa Orozco-Ceja, María Soledad Romero-López, Mayra Yolanda Barajas-Virgen, Leopoldo Martín Baiza-Durán, Lourdes Yolotzin Rodríguez-Herrera | | Clinical Ophthalmology. 2022; Volume 16: 3753 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 2 |
Adverse reactions to 1% cyclopentolate eye drops in children: an analysis using logistic regression models |
|
| Toshihiro Imai, Satoshi Hasebe, Takashi Furuse, Shin Morisawa, Kayoko Hasebe, Yuka Nagata, Tomoki Tokutake, Yumiko Moriyama | | Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 2021; 41(2): 424 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 3 |
Prevalence of and Factors Associated with Diabetic Retinopathy in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus at Siriraj Hospital – Thailand’s Largest National Tertiary Referral Center |
|
| Thirajit Boonsaen, Sawaraj Choksakunwong, Raweewan Lertwattanarak | | Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy. 2021; Volume 14: 4945 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 4 |
Effects of Cyclopentolate Hydrochloride Dosage on Anterior Segment Parameters in Young Adults (Measured with Pentacam) |
|
| Waleed M Alghamdi, Saif H Alrasheed, Vishakh Nair, Muhammed S Alluwimi | | Clinical Ophthalmology. 2021; Volume 15: 891 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 5 |
Factors Affecting Pupil Reactivity After Cycloplegia in Asian Children |
|
| Jane Lim, Audrey Chia, Seyed Ehsan Saffari, Swati Handa | | Asia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology. 2019; 8(4): 304 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 6 |
Comparison of retinoscopy results with and without 1% cyclopentolate in school-aged children |
|
| Sue E Doherty, Lesley A Doyle, Sara J McCullough, Kathryn J Saunders | | Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 2019; 39(4): 272 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 7 |
The Effect of Topical 1% Cyclopentolate on IOLMaster Biometry |
|
| Ceyhun Arici,Adem Turk,Osman Melih Ceylan,Mehmet Kola | | Optometry and Vision Science. 2014; 91(11): 1343 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | |
|
|
|
|