About us |  Subscription |  Top cited articles |  e-Alerts  | Feedback |  Login   
  Home | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Search | Instructions   Print this article Email this article   Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
 
 Official publication of All India Ophthalmological Society   Users Online: 168
  Search
 
  
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Article in PDF (467 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed219    
    Printed14    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded27    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

 


 
  Table of Contents  
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Year : 2011  |  Volume : 59  |  Issue : 6  |  Page : 521-522
 

Authors' reply


Department of Ophthalmology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India

Date of Web Publication19-Oct-2011

Correspondence Address:
Lekha Mary Abraham
Department of Ophthalmology, Christian Medical College, Arni Road, Vellore - 632001
India
Login to access the Email id


Get Permissions

 



How to cite this article:
Abraham LM, Kuriakose T. Authors' reply. Indian J Ophthalmol 2011;59:521-2

How to cite this URL:
Abraham LM, Kuriakose T. Authors' reply. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2011 [cited 2013 May 23];59:521-2. Available from: http://www.ijo.in/text.asp?2011/59/6/521/86332


Dear Editor,

We thank the authors for their interest in our article [1] and appreciate their comments. We understand that performing correlations in each refractive group holds the numerals into a narrow interval, especially among myopes where the total number is only 50. However, in our study, the only moderate correlation that we have been able to demonstrate was in a small group of myopes between 35 and 39 years of age (n=16).

As suggested by the authors we performed Pearson's correlation coefficient and analysis of variance (ANOVA) on the 316 subjects to look for any possible correlation. The Pearson's correlation coefficient r between amplitude of accommodation (AA) and central anterior chamber depth (CACD), AA and lens thickness (LT), and AA and axial length (AL) was -0.041, -0.0906 and -0.0649 respectively. [2] ANOVA also did not show any significant correlation between AA and the ocular parameters. The significance level (P) for the correlation between AA vs. CACD was 0.192, AA vs. LT was 0.16 and AA vs. AL was 0.964.

Since myopes had the maximum correlation, there is a possibility that increased anterior chamber depth in these patients allows the lens to move forward during accommodation. A larger number of myopes would bring out the correlation if any between AA and ocular parameters.

 
   References Top

1.Abraham LM, Kuriakose T, Sivanandam V, Venkatesan N, Thomas R, Muliyil J. Correlation between ocular parameters and amplitude of accommodation. Indian J Ophthalmol 2010;58:483-5.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
2.Gundogan FC, Tas A, Erdem U. Correlation between ocular parameters and amplitude of accommodation. Indian J Ophthalmol 2011;59:521.  Back to cited text no. 2
  Medknow Journal  




 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
 

    

© 2005 - Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
Published by Medknow

Online since 1st April '05