|Year : 2012 | Volume
| Issue : 2 | Page : 151-153
Short-term outcome of Boston Type 1 keratoprosthesis for bilateral limbal stem cell deficiency
Sayan Basu1, Mukesh Taneja1, Raja Narayanan2, Sirisha Senthil3, Virender S Sangwan1
1 Cornea & Anterior Segment Service, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Kallam Anji Reddy Campus, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, India
2 Smt. Kanuri Santhamma Retina and Vitreous Centre, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Kallam Anji Reddy Campus, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, India
3 VST Glaucoma Centre, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Kallam Anji Reddy Campus, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, India
|Date of Submission||14-Apr-2010|
|Date of Acceptance||10-Aug-2010|
|Date of Web Publication||20-Mar-2012|
Virender S Sangwan
Cornea & Anterior Segment Service, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Kallam Anji Reddy Campus, LV Prasad Marg, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad - 500 034
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
This study reports the short-term functional and anatomical outcome of Boston Type 1 keratoprosthesis (Boston Kpro) implantation for bilateral limbal stem cell deficiency (LCSD). Retrospective analysis was done on eight eyes of eight patients who underwent Boston Kpro implantation between July 2009 and October 2009. The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and slit-lamp biomicroscopy findings were assessed at 1, 3 and 6 months postoperatively. All eight eyes retained the prosthesis. BCVA of 20/40 or better was achieved in 8, 6, and 5 eyes at 1, 3, and 6 months, respectively, postoperatively. One patient each developed epithelial defect, sterile stromal melt and fungal keratitis in the late postoperative period associated with antecedent loss of the soft contact lens from the eye. Boston Kpro has good short-term visual and anatomical outcome in patients with bilateral LSCD, provided compliance with postoperative care can be ensured.
Keywords: Boston keratoprosthesis, limbal stem cell deficiency
|How to cite this article:|
Basu S, Taneja M, Narayanan R, Senthil S, Sangwan VS. Short-term outcome of Boston Type 1 keratoprosthesis for bilateral limbal stem cell deficiency. Indian J Ophthalmol 2012;60:151-3
|How to cite this URL:|
Basu S, Taneja M, Narayanan R, Senthil S, Sangwan VS. Short-term outcome of Boston Type 1 keratoprosthesis for bilateral limbal stem cell deficiency. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2012 [cited 2020 Apr 7];60:151-3. Available from: http://www.ijo.in/text.asp?2012/60/2/151/94060
The Boston Type 1 keratoprosthesis (Boston Kpro) was developed to treat patients with blindness due to end-stage corneal disease and poor prognosis for penetrating keratoplasty, like in eyes with repeated graft failure, severe corneal neovascularization and limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD) as a result of chemical and thermal burns, provided the ocular surface is still wet. , With the evolution of the design and the postoperative care regimen of the Boston Kpro, outcomes have improved significantly and its popularity is on the rise all over the world. , The aim of this study was to review the short-term visual and anatomical outcome of this procedure in our initial few cases.
| Materials and Methods|| |
This was a retrospective, interventional case series of eight eyes of eight patients in whom Boston Kpro was implanted between July 2009 and October 2009 for bilateral LSCD with a minimum postoperative follow-up of 6 months duration. Informed written consent was obtained from all the study patients before they underwent this procedure.
All patients underwent a complete preoperative ophthalmological work up (study and fellow eye) including best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) measurement, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, intra-ocular pressure measurement, posterior segment evaluation by ultrasound B scan and axial length measurement for both eyes.
All patients were operated under general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation. The Boston Kpro was ordered and obtained from the Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary (Boston, MA, USA) and the standard technique of implantation as described previously was performed. , Briefly, the recipient cornea was trephined with a 8.5-mm disposable trephine; extracapsular cataract extraction (ECCE) was performed if the patient was phakic and a plano posterior chamber intra-ocular lens (PCIOL) was implanted in the capsular bag or the eye was left aphakic. The implant with a backplate diameter of 8.5 mm was assembled on a 9-mm donor lenticule and was sutured in place with 16, 10-0 nylon interrupted sutures. A 16-mm diameter Kontur (Kontur Contact Lens Co., Richmond, CA, USA) plano contact lens (CL) was placed on the eye on completion of the surgery.
Postoperatively, the patients were routinely evaluated on day 1, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and every 3 months thereafter. The postoperative medication included topical administration of prednisolone acetate 1% eye drops in tapering doses, moxifloxacin 0.5% eye drops four times daily, and fortified vancomycin 0.5% eye drops once daily. The patients underwent routine ophthalmic examination at each follow-up visit.
The medical records were reviewed and the following data were retrieved: demographic characteristics (age, gender, and laterality), initial diagnosis, previous surgeries (including type, date, and visual outcome) and duration of follow-up (in months), BCVA and slit-lamp findings at each follow-up visit. The incidence and type of complications intraoperatively and postoperatively were also noted.
| Results|| |
The demographic data of the eight patients are provided in [Table 1]. The data on initial diagnosis and previous surgical procedures are provided in [Table 2]. No patient had evidence of any ocular inflammation, as assessed clinically, at the time of surgery [Figure 1]. Six of the eight eyes had an aphakic and two eyes had a pseudophakic Boston Kpro implantation.
|Table 2: Initial diagnosis, previous surgical procedures and their outcomes|
Click here to view
|Figure 1: Slit-lamp photographs of patients before and after Boston Kpro implantation. Top row: preoperative photographs of patients 1-4 (left to right); second row: 1 month postoperative photographs of patients 1-4 (left to right); third row: preoperative photographs of patients 5-8 (left to right); bottom row: 1 month postoperative photographs of patients 5-8 (left to right)|
Click here to view
The preoperative and postoperative BCVA of each patient at each follow-up visit is given in [Table 3]. The number of eyes with BCVA of 20/40 or better was 4, 7, 8, 6 and 5 at day 1, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months, respectively, postoperatively. The mean spherical refractive error was −0.375 ± 1.2 D (range −2.5 D to +1.25 D) at 3 months postoperatively. Two of the eight eyes that had 20/40 or better vision at 1 month postoperatively developed a visually significant posterior capsular opacification (PCO) at 3 months and 1 eye developed the same at 6 months. All five patients who completed 9 months of follow-up maintained the same BCVA as at the 6 month follow-up visit.
|Table 3: Pre-operative and post-operative best spectacle corrected visual acuity at day 1, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 9 months in Snellen equivalents|
Click here to view
The details of the postoperative complications, their management and outcomes are provided in [Table 4].
|Table 4: Intraoperative, early (<6 weeks) postoperative and late (>6 weeks) postoperative complications of Boston Kpro|
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
In our series of eight eyes of eight patients with bilateral LSCD, we noted encouraging short-term visual and anatomical outcomes with the Boston Kpro. We had attempted multiple alternative surgical modalities [Table 2] in almost all the eyes with limited success before we resorted to using the Boston Kpro. All patients retained the prosthesis with remarkable improvement in BCVA and most patients retained their best vision at last follow-up.
Boston Kpro implantation has been shown to have excellent visual outcomes in eyes with bilateral LSCD, provided the posterior segment of the eye is normal and the optic nerve is healthy and our experience has been similar. , The surgical technique is single-staged and simple and there were no serious intraoperative complications. Postoperatively, we encountered one case each of sterile graft melt and fungal keratitis, both of which were managed conservatively [Table 4] and the prosthesis could be retained. The soft CL is necessary in these eyes to stabilize the surface and its loss could have led to surface breakdown and secondary fungal infection (patient 8), for which use of vancomycin is considered a risk factor. ,
We chose to implant Boston Kpro in these cases with poor functional vision in both eyes on the basis of our disappointing clinical experience with live related stem cell transplantation or cultivated oral mucosal epithelial transplantation (COMET) along with lamellar or penetrating keratoplasty for visual rehabilitation. Previous studies have shown that these modalities either fail despite long-term immunosuppression or have disappointing visual outcomes even when being successful anatomically. ,
The drawbacks of this study are the short follow-up and small sample size; however, to our knowledge, this is the first report of the successful use of this prosthesis in the Indian subcontinent and this is where the relevance and value of our outcomes lie. We are also initiating a large, long-term prospective study to validate our results. In this study, we found that the Boston Kpro has good short-term visual and anatomical outcome in patients with bilateral LSCD, provided compliance with postoperative care can be ensured.
| Acknowledgment|| |
The work was supported by the Hyderabad Eye Research Foundation.
| References|| |
Aldave AJ, Kamal KM, Vo RC, Yu F. The Boston type I keratoprosthesis: Improving outcomes and expanding indications. Ophthalmology 2009;116:640-51.
Zerbe BL, Belin MW, Ciolino JB. Boston Type 1 Keratoprosthesis Study Group. Results from the multicenter Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis study. Ophthalmology 2006;113:1779-84.
Khan BF, Harissi-Dagher M, Khan DM, Dohlman CH. Advances in Boston keratoprosthesis: Enhancing retention and prevention of infection and inflammation. Int Ophthalmol Clin 2007;47:61-71.
Harissi-Dagher M, Beyer J, Dohlman CH. The role of soft contact lenses as an adjunct to the Boston keratoprosthesis. Int Ophthalmol Clin 2008;48:43-51.
Harissi-Dagher M, Dohlman CH. The Boston Keratoprosthesis in severe ocular trauma. Can J Ophthalmol 2008;43:165-9.
Akpek EK, Harissi-Dagher M, Petrarca R, Butrus SI, Pineda R 2 nd
, Aquavella JV, et al
. Outcomes of Boston keratoprosthesis in aniridia: A retrospective multicenter study. Am J Ophthalmol 2007;144:227-31.
Barnes SD, Dohlman CH, Durand ML. Fungal colonization and infection in Boston keratoprosthesis. Cornea 2007;26:9-15.
Cauchi PA, Ang GS, Azuara-Blanco A, Burr JM. A systematic literature review of surgical interventions for limbal stem cell deficiency in humans. Am J Ophthalmol 2008;146:251-9.
Liang L, Sheha H, Tseng SC. Long-term outcomes of keratolimbal allograft for total limbal stem cell deficiency using combined immunosuppressive agents and correction of ocular surface deficits. Arch Ophthalmol 2009;127:1428-34.
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]