Glyxambi
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 1077
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page


 
   Table of Contents      
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Year : 2012  |  Volume : 60  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 157-158

Is it really a study of community-acquired bacterial infections?


Department of Ophthalmology, Shyam Shah Medical College, Rewa, MP, India

Date of Web Publication20-Mar-2012

Correspondence Address:
Shivcharan L Chandravanshi
Department of Ophthalmology, Shyam Shah Medical College and Associated Gandhi Memorial Hospital, Rewa - 486 001, MP
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0301-4738.94064

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Chandravanshi SL. Is it really a study of community-acquired bacterial infections?. Indian J Ophthalmol 2012;60:157-8

How to cite this URL:
Chandravanshi SL. Is it really a study of community-acquired bacterial infections?. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2012 [cited 2019 Aug 24];60:157-8. Available from: http://www.ijo.in/text.asp?2012/60/2/157/94064

Dear Editor,

I read the article by Bharathi et al. with interest. [1] I wish to point out the following observations.

  1. The authors have titled their study as "Etiology and antibacterial susceptibility pattern of community-acquired bacterial ocular infections in a tertiary eye care hospital in South India." However, they have not mentioned any inclusion or exclusion criteria in their study to diagnose "community-acquired" bacterial ocular infection. Community-acquired infection is an infection that was present or incubating at the time of hospitalization and was not caused by an organism acquired during previous health care. [2] Centre for Disease Control has laid down the criteria for diagnosis of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) infection [Table 1]. [2] Community-acquired infections are commonly caused by Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae,  Escherichia More Details coli, Klebsiella and Proteus. This criterion can be applied for any species of bacteria or in general bacterial infection. This study was done at a tertiary eye care hospital; therefore, there is large number of referred patients who had been already treated in the past in health care settings elsewhere. Patients treated elsewhere in the past are not fulfilling the above criterion. Community-acquired infection is different from hospital-acquired infection in terms of epidemiology, antibiotic sensitivity patterns, virulence, clinical presentation, and treatment. [2]
  2. Table 1: Criteria for probable diagnosis of infection caused by the community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

    Click here to view
  3. The authors have not mentioned about the method of specimen collection in orbital cellulitis patients. Positive culture yield in their study was 42.9% (9 out of 21). Liu et al. reported 74% positive local culture yield in their study. [3] I feel this low positive culture yield may be due to the incorrect selection of site/method of specimen collection. Sinusitis is the most common cause of orbital cellulitis in adult population. The ethmoidal sinus is the most frequently involved sinus in orbital cellulitis secondary to sinusitis. There are multiple factors for the spread of ethmoidal sinus infection to orbit, such as close proximity, very thin medial wall of orbit, various foramina in medial wall for neurovascular bundles and natural dehiscence in lamina papyracea. Therefore, collection of discharge from the inferior meatus of the nose is crucial for culture of pathogenic organisms in orbital cellulitis.
  4. A part of this study was also published in the past. [4] There are few disparities in these two similar studies conducted by the same ophthalmic center. In the present study, the authors mentioned the total number of orbital cellulitis cases over a period of 6 years to be 21. On other hand, a part of the study published elsewhere shows the number of orbital cellulitis cases in a single year to be nil [Table 2]. [5] The authors should explain why this disparity has developed.
  5. Table 2: Orbital and ocular adenexal infection in the present study and previously published study

    Click here to view


 
  References Top

1.
Bharathi MJ, Ramakrishnan R, Shivakumar C, Meenakshi R, Lionalraj D. Etiology and antibacterial susceptibility pattern of community-acquired bacterial ocular infections in a tertiary eye care hospital in south India. Indian J Ophthalmol 2010;58:497-507.   Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
2.
Salgado CD, Farr BM, Calfee DP. Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: A meta-analysis of prevalence and risk factors. Clin Infect Dis 2003;36:131-9.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
3.
Liu IT, Kao SC, Wang AG, Tsai CC, Liang CK, Hsu WM. Preseptal and orbital cellulitis: A 10-year review of hospitalized patients. J Chin Med Assoc 2006;69:415-22.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
4.
D'Souza N, Rodrigues C, Mehta A. Molecular characterization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with emergence of epidemic clones of sequence type (ST) 22 and ST 772 in Mumbai, India. J Clin Microbiol 2010;48:1806-11.   Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
5.
Ramesh S, Ramakrishnan R, Bharathi MJ, Amuthan M, Viswanathan S. Prevalence of bacterial pathogens causing ocular infections in South India. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 2010;53:281-6.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]


This article has been cited by
1 Authorsę reply
Jayahar Bharathi, M., Ramakrishnan, R., Shivakumar, C., Meenakshi, R.
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology. 2012; 60(3): 243-244
[Pubmed]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
References
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1724    
    Printed25    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded98    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal