Glyxambi
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 405
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

   Table of Contents      
EDITORIAL
Year : 2013  |  Volume : 61  |  Issue : 10  |  Page : 539-540

Ocular trauma, an evolving sub specialty


Editor, Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, Chairman, Managing Director, Aditya Jyot Eye Hospital Pvt Ltd, Wadala (W), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

Date of Web Publication7-Nov-2013

Correspondence Address:
Sundaram Natarajan
Editor, Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, Chairman, Managing Director, Aditya Jyot Eye Hospital Pvt Ltd, Wadala (W), Mumbai, Maharashtra
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0301-4738.121063

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Natarajan S. Ocular trauma, an evolving sub specialty. Indian J Ophthalmol 2013;61:539-40

How to cite this URL:
Natarajan S. Ocular trauma, an evolving sub specialty. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2013 [cited 2019 Dec 8];61:539-40. Available from: http://www.ijo.in/text.asp?2013/61/10/539/121063

Most of us commonly see patients with ocular trauma in our daily practice. This may range from a small foreign body on the cornea to a ruptured globe, from a patient presenting with 6/6 vision to a patient with no perception of light. All these patients get treated differently depending upon the part of the country and availability of medical support. All of us have different levels of involvement in treating them.

There have been numerous individual reports on ocular trauma. WHO has reported 55 million eye injuries causing restriction of daily activities, of which 1.6 million go blind every day. [1] Vats et al., have reported the prevalence of ocular trauma to be 2.4% of population in an urban city in India. 11.4% of these are blind. [2] In this issue there is an interesting article by Agarwal et al., on visual outcomes in patients with posterior open globe injury.

The other aspects that need attention include terminology and classification of ocular trauma [Figure 1] and [Figure 2]. Among the standard systems available, Birmingham Eye Trauma Terminology is the one most widely accepted. [3]
Figure 1: Present classification of Ocular trauma

Click here to view
Figure 2: General classification of Ocular trauma

Click here to view


There have also been numerous controversies with respect to classification. There have been classifications approved by International Society of Ocular Trauma, but these are limited to globe injuries and do not include injury to the orbit or adnexa. [3]

The classification proposed by Dr Shukla, which is approved by the Ocular Trauma Society of India (OTSI), is a comprehensive classification.

In spite of these numerous articles on ocular trauma, we still do not have any estimate of the actual prevalence of ocular trauma in India. The American Society of Ocular Trauma has a United States Eye Injury Registry and the International Society of Ocular Trauma has a World Eye Injury Registry. The Ocular Trauma Society of India has proposed an India Eye Injury Registry for the same. A registry would enable us to measure epidemiology, standardize and evaluation protocols, data collection for treatment outcomes, propose clinical trials, and disseminate information.



I would like to once again emphasis on the changing perspectives in ocular trauma and look at ocular trauma as an evolving separate sub-specialty.

 
  References Top

1.
Ngrel AD, Thylefors B. The global impact of eye injuries [J]. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 1998;5:143-69.   Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Vats S, Murthy GV, Chandra M, Gupta SK, Vashist P, Gogoi M. Epidemiological study of ocular trauma in an urban slum population in Delhi, India. Indian J Ophthalmol 2008;56:313-6.   Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
3.
Kuhn F, Morris R, Witherspoon CD. Birmingham Eye Trauma Terminology (BETT): Terminology and classification of mechanical eye injuries. Ophthalmol Clin N Am 2002;15:139-43.  Back to cited text no. 3
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
References
Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2979    
    Printed44    
    Emailed2    
    PDF Downloaded508    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal