Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 8026
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

   Table of Contents      
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Year : 2013  |  Volume : 61  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 186

Regarding comparison of different techniques of cataract surgery in bacterial contamination of the anterior chamber in diabetic and non-diabetic population


1 Department of Ophthalmology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
2 Department of Ophthalmology, The Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA

Date of Web Publication17-May-2013

Correspondence Address:
Kapil G Kapoor
The Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN. 55905
USA
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0301-4738.112170

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Wells KM, Kapoor KG, Gibran S K. Regarding comparison of different techniques of cataract surgery in bacterial contamination of the anterior chamber in diabetic and non-diabetic population. Indian J Ophthalmol 2013;61:186

How to cite this URL:
Wells KM, Kapoor KG, Gibran S K. Regarding comparison of different techniques of cataract surgery in bacterial contamination of the anterior chamber in diabetic and non-diabetic population. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2013 [cited 2020 Feb 23];61:186. Available from: http://www.ijo.in/text.asp?2013/61/4/186/112170

Dear Editor,

We read with great interest the authors' recent report on pre-operative povidone-iodine and ofloxacin instillation in diabetics and non-diabetic patients prior to cataract surgery. [1] The evaluation of antiseptic techniques is particularly important in diabetic patients who may have an increased predisposition to post-operative infection. Evaluating povidone-iodine in diabetic patients is particularly interesting because both can prove to be individually toxic to the cornea. We were interested if the authors did a systematic corneal evaluation as part of their pre-operative and post-operative examination as we did not notice this documented in the study?

Diabetes mellitus has been associated with corneal epitheliopathy, decreased corneal oxygen uptake, and altered corneal hysteresis with some evidence suggesting a positive weak correlation with elevated serum glucose levels. [2],[3] Povidone-iodine (5%) (PI) has also been associated with toxic corneal epitheliopathy including induction of epithelial cell death and delayed corneal epithelial healing. [4],[5] Following pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for proliferative diabetic retinopathy in poorly controlled diabetics, we have noted a particularly high incidence of peri-operative corneal epitheliopathy. We have speculated that PI and poorly controlled diabetes mellitus may have a synergistic effect in compounding post-operative corneal epitheliopathy.

To evaluate this, a retrospective study was conducted of 68 patients who underwent PPV for proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Each patient had thorough pre-operative and post-operative corneal examination, including documentation of fluorescein staining pattern, tear-film breakup time, punctuate epithelial erosions, and epithelial defects. All patients underwent pre-operative preparation with 5% PI to the eyelids, eyelashes, and by flushing the conjunctival fornices with mean contact time of 5 minutes. Fifty percent of eyes developed post-operative corneal epitheliopathy (34 eyes). The average HbA1c for the epitheliopathy group was 8.01% while the average for the non-epitheliopathy group was 8.44%, and this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.45). There was no statistically significant difference in surgical duration (mean 55 minutes) between patients developing corneal epitheliopathy and not developing corneal epitheliopathy, and there were no cases of endophthalmitis.

This study demonstrates a high incidence of corneal epitheliopathy in diabetic patients who underwent PPV for proliferative diabetic retinopathy. There was no correlation between glycosylated hemoglobin levels and corneal epitheliopathy. Further formal studies are warranted to fully investigate this. We would be interested in the authors' experiences of post-operative corneal evaluation and glycosylated hemoglobin levels from their study, if available.

 
  References Top

1.
Kumar MA, Kurien SS, Selvaraj S, Devi U, Selvasundari S. Comparison of different techniques of cataract surgery in bacterial contamination of the anterior chamber in diabetic and non-diabetic population. Indian J Ophthalmol 2012;60:41-4.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
2.
Rubinstein MP, Parrish ST, Vernon SA. Corneal epithelial oxygen uptake rate in diabetes mellitus. Eye (Lond) 1990;4 (Pt 5):757-9.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]    
3.
Kotecha A, Oddone F, Sinapis C, Elsheikh A, Sinapis D, Sinapis A, et al. Corneal biomechanical characteristics in patients with diabetes mellitus. J Cataract Refract Surg 2010;36:1822-8.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]    
4.
Yanai R, Yamada N, Ueda K, Tajiri M, Matsumoto T, Kido K, et al. Evaluation of povidone-iodine as a disinfectant solution for contact lenses: Antimicrobial activity and cytotoxicity for corneal epithelial cells. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2006;29:85-91.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]    
5.
York K, Miller S, Gaster R, Burstein N. Polyvinylpyrrolidone iodine: Corneal toxicology and epithelial healing in a rabbit model. J Ocul Pharmacol 1998;4:351-8.  Back to cited text no. 5
    




 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1231    
    Printed5    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded99    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal