Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 12240
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

   Table of Contents      
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2014  |  Volume : 62  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 461-463

Quality of vision in patients implanted with aspherical and spherical intraocular lens: Intraindividual comparison


1 Departments of Ophthalmology, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
2 Istituto di Clinica e Ricerca Humanitas, Rozzano, Milano; Department of Health Sciences, University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy
3 Department of Health Sciences, University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy

Date of Submission22-Mar-2012
Date of Acceptance20-Sep-2012
Date of Web Publication8-May-2014

Correspondence Address:
Mario R Romano
Dipartimento di Scienze Per La Salute, Via F De Sanctis, 86100 Campobasso
Italy
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0301-4738.116489

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Aims: To compare the quality of vision in pseudophakic patients implanted with aspherical and spherical intraocular lenses (IOLs). Materials and Methods: Randomized prospective longitudinal intrapatient comparison between aspherical and spherical IOLs performed on 22 patients who underwent bilateral cataract surgery. Best corrected visual acuity, subjective contrast sensitivity, Strehl ratio and spherical aberrations (SA), and higher order wavefront aberrations for a 3.5 mm and a 6.0 mm pupil were measured after 3 months of cataract surgery. Results: SA (Z4,0) decreased significantly in eyes with aspherical IOL implant (P = 0.004). Modulation transfer function (MTF) and point spread function (PSF) resulted no significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.87; P = 0.32). Conclusion: Although the SA is significantly lower in eyes implanted with aspherical IOL, the quality of vision determined with MTF and PSF does not significantly differ for subjective and objective parameters that were analyzed.

Keywords: Aspherical intraocular lens, quality of vision, spherical aberrations


How to cite this article:
Semeraro F, Romano MR, Duse S, Costagliola C. Quality of vision in patients implanted with aspherical and spherical intraocular lens: Intraindividual comparison. Indian J Ophthalmol 2014;62:461-3

How to cite this URL:
Semeraro F, Romano MR, Duse S, Costagliola C. Quality of vision in patients implanted with aspherical and spherical intraocular lens: Intraindividual comparison. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2014 [cited 2020 May 27];62:461-3. Available from: http://www.ijo.in/text.asp?2014/62/4/461/116489

The crystalline lens and the cornea of the human eye play an important role in determining the total ocular spherical aberrations (SA). In healthy young individuals, the negative SA of the lens is partially compensated by the positive corneal SA, resulting in a low level of SA for the entire eye. With aging, the SA of the lens becomes positive and, added to the corneal SA, it increases the total aberration of the eye. [1],[2],[3],[4]

The spherical intraocular lens (IOL) implant after cataract surgery has a tendency to increase the overall positive SA. Standard IOLs have a positive SA, which, increasing the total SA, produces a pseudophakic eye with a total aberration not better than that recorded in an aged eye with transparent lens. [4]

In this prospective study, we analyzed the visual performance of both eyes of 22 patients who underwent bilateral cataract surgery, implanted in one eye with an aspherical IOL, whereas the contralateral received the same standard type of spherical IOL. The aim of this work was to verify the quality of vision and the contrast sensitivity, throughout subjective and objective tests, after implantation of spherical and aspherical IOLs.


  Materials and Methods Top


Subjects

Forty-four eyes of 22 patients who underwent bilateral cataract surgery were recruited prospectively from August 2007 to October 2008. The exclusion criteria were: age less than 50 years, severe systemic disease, pregnancy, any uncontrolled ocular disease, presence of ocular pathology other than cataract, and previous history of ocular surgery. Patients with incomplete follow-up were also excluded. The patients received an aspherical IOL (AcrySof IQSN60WF, Alcon Laboratories Inc. Fort Worth, TX) in one eye and the same standard spherical IOL (AcrySof SA60AT; Alcon Laboratories Inc) in the other eye. Demographic characteristics of patients are summarized in [Table 1].

Contrast sensitivity has been tested by CSV-1000E, Vector Vision, Arcanum, OH, USA (25% and 12.5% contrast level) at 6 and 12 cycles per degree. Every patient was examined with the best spectacle correction under mesopic conditions. Measurements of ocular wavefront error were performed 3 months after cataract surgery using the OPD Scan-II aberrometer/topographer NIDEK Co Ltd, Gamagori, Japan. We analyzed total, corneal, and internal wavefront errors for pupil diameters of 3.5 and 6 mm focusing mainly on SA (Z4,0).

Vision quality has been expressed by the point spread function (PSF) and the modulation transfer function (MTF). The PSF describes the light distribution on the retina of a point source and it can be expressed with the Strehl ratio. The Strehl ratio expresses the ability of the eye to produce a point imagev on the retina when a point object is observed. [5]

The MTF is reported as a percentage of the contrast of the image that is transmitted to the retina at various spatial frequencies. [5] We also calculated MTF A/B ratio (the area ratio of the MTF curve of the examined eye over the MTF curve of the ideal eye) and MTF H/B ratio (the area ratio of the MTF curve of the examined eye without low-order aberrations over the MTF curve of the ideal eye). We analyzed the Strehl ratio and the MTF graph with a 4.5 mm pupil and 6 th Zernike order of aberrations. A P ≤ 0.05 was considered to be significant.


  Results Top


The mean age of the 22 patients was 67.6 years, 6.1 SD (range: 56-75). Demographic characteristics of patients are summarized in [Table 1].
Table 1: Demographic characteristics of study

Click here to view


The results of contrast sensitivity testing, under mesopic conditions at 25% and 12.5% contrast, showed that there was no statistically significant difference between the groups (P = 0.14; P = 0.69).

Aberration (Z4 [4,0]) (Zernike term no. 12), for a 4.5 mm optical zone diameter, decreased significantly in eyes with aspheric IOL implant (P = 0.004).

The two groups were significantly different in terms of Zernike values for total (P < 0.001), whereas no difference was recorded for internal (P = 0.53) wavefront error for 3.5 and 6 mm diameter pupil analysis. The results of MTF and PSF Strehl ratio were not significantly different for two groups (P = 0.87; P = 0.32). The results are summarized in [Table 2].
Table 2: Difference between aspheric and standard spherical intra ocular lenses regard to subjective and objective parameters analyzed. For some patients a pupil diameter of 6 mm was obtained after instillation of mydriatic eye drops (phenylephrine). Value of the ratio close to 1 describes few aberrations and more image contrast

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


The SA is a symmetrical axial aberration in which the light rays that pass through the paraxial zone of the pupil focus at a different distance where the rays that pass through the marginal pupil.

The SA of the anterior corneal surface is added to that of the posterior surface and that of the IOL. These will tend to compensate if they are of opposite signs. [4] In theory, the use of IOLs with modified aspheric surface profile should be able to compensate the positive SA in order to increase the quality of vision.

In a recent prospective randomized study on 31 patients, Ohtani et al. [6] compared aspheric and spherical silicone IOLs. The author reported significantly reduced ocular SA, but no significant differences between IOLs with regard all-distance visual acuity and ocular wavefront aberrations except for fourth-order Root Mean Square (RMS) (SA [Z4,0]).

Kim et al. [7] reported a better contrast sensitivity at 3-6 cycles per degree (cpd) in photopic and 1.5-6 cpd in mesopic conditions for 23 eyes implanted with aspheric (Tecnis ZA9003, Advanced Medical Optics, Santa Ana, CA) IOL. The author has found similar results in terms of other Zernike values and RMS of higher order wavefront aberrations, whereas MTF curve was better for the aspherical IOL group at 5-10 cpd.

Nabh et al. [8] reported a significantly decreased positive spherical ocular aberration after three different aspheric IOL implants, with no differences regarding contrast sensitivity and visual performance between the lenses. If the overall SA is not excessive, there will be a slight loss in contrast, with an improvement in the depth of the field due to the multifocal effect of the SA. [9]

In our prospective series, a significant lower SA in the eyes implanted with aspherical IOL as compared to the spherical ones, without any real gain in terms of vision, was detected. We have also found a significant difference between the groups for total aberrations, whereas no differences were found regarding internal aberrations. We believe that the decentration of aspherical IOL may induce an increase in total aberrations no more compensated by corneal aberrations. In respect to the parameters analyzed for the quality of vision (best corrected visual acuity, PSF, MTF), there were no differences between aspherical IOL and standard type of spherical IOL.

 
  References Top

1.
Smith G, Cox MJ, Calver R, Garner LF. The spherical aberration of the crystalline lens of the human eye. Vision Res 2001;41:235-43.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Glasser A, Campbell MC. Presbyopia and the optical changes in the human crystalline lens with age. Vision Res 1998;38:209-29.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Artal P, Berrio E, Guirao A, Piers P. Contribution of the cornea and internal surfaces to the change of ocular aberrations with age. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 2002;19:137-43.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Calossi A. Corneal asphericity and spherical aberration. J Refract Surg 2007;23:505-14.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Bellucci R, Morselli S, Piers P. Comparison of wavefront aberrations and optical quality of eyes implanted with five different intraocular lenses. J Refract Surg 2004;20:297-306.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Ohtani S, Gekka S, Honbou M, Kataoka Y, Minami K, Miyata K, et al. One-year prospective intrapatient comparison of aspherical and spherical intraocular lenses in patients with bilateral cataract. Am J Ophthalmol 2009;147:984-9.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Kim SW, Ahn H, Kim EK, Kim TI. Comparison of higher order aberrations in eyes with aspherical or spherical intraocular lenses. Eye (Lond) 2008;22:1493-8.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Nabh R, Ram J, Pandav SS, Gupta A. Visual performance and contrast sensitivity after phacoemulsification with implantation of aspheric foldable intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 2009;35:347-53.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Nio YK, Jansonius NM, Fidler V, Geraghty E, Norrby S, Kooijman AC. Spherical and irregular aberrations are important for the optimal performance of the human eye. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2002;22:103-12.  Back to cited text no. 9
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Abstract
Materials and Me...
Results
Discussion
References
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2343    
    Printed18    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded231    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal