|LETTER TO THE EDITOR
|Year : 2014 | Volume
| Issue : 6 | Page : 748-749
A comparative analysis of the cost of cataract surgery abroad and in the United States
Manuel David Camejo, Mahendra K Rupani, Ronald Luke Rebenitsch
Department of Ophthalmology, University of Missouri, Kansas City, Missouri, United States
|Date of Web Publication||8-Jul-2014|
Dr. Ronald Luke Rebenitsch
Eye Foundation, 2301 Holmes Street, Kansas City, MO - 64108, Missouri
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
|How to cite this article:|
Camejo MD, Rupani MK, Rebenitsch RL. A comparative analysis of the cost of cataract surgery abroad and in the United States. Indian J Ophthalmol 2014;62:748-9
|How to cite this URL:|
Camejo MD, Rupani MK, Rebenitsch RL. A comparative analysis of the cost of cataract surgery abroad and in the United States. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2014 [cited 2020 May 29];62:748-9. Available from: http://www.ijo.in/text.asp?2014/62/6/748/136288
Medical tourism is an exponentially growing industry. Local versus overseas cost considerations for other surgical procedures have led to the evolution this industry with an estimated value of $100 billion a year. The major players are India, South Korea, Thailand, Singapore and Hong Kong, with a combined 1.3 million medical tourists a year. Benefits for these medical tourists include decreased waiting time, comparable technology, minimal language barrier and decreased cost of treatment. 
As it is well known, cataract is the leading cause of treatable blindness worldwide.  1.82 million cataract procedures were performed in the US in 2010. Given the medical tourism potential for cataract extraction, we decided to perform an economic medical tourism comparison of the cost of unilateral and bilateral traditional cataract extraction with a foldable, acrylic, monofocal to a U.S. patient.
We constructed a combined Markov decision model using Tree age Pro (2013 Williamsport, MA) to estimate and compare the cost of cataract surgery to an American domestically and abroad. The following countries were included in our analysis: United States, Mexico, Spain, the United Kingdom, Hungary, Malaysia, Thailand, Germany, India, and Turkey. This model is depicted in [Figure 1]. Analyzed costs included travel, consultation, both surgical and anesthesia fees, follow ups, medications, ambulatory surgery center (ASC) fees, intraocular lens (IOL) calculations. Values and probabilities were obtained from published data. ,,,, Complications included in the analysis are as follows: Posterior capsular opacification, retinal detachment, retained lens fragment, vitreous loss, endophthalmitis, cystoid macular edema, the need for general anesthesia.
The analyses were separated into unilateral and bilateral surgery. For unilateral surgery, the lowest cost option was the Hungary with a mean of $2,609 with the US being a close second at $2,692. For bilateral surgery, the lowest cost was in Hungary at $3,717. The United States in this case was in the middle at $5243. The rest of the costs in order from lowest to highest cost can be seen for unilateral and bilateral surgery in [Table 1] and [Table 2], respectively.
Linear sensitivity analysis was performed for the costs of lodging/travel and published surgical costs. With travel and lodging costs, the overall ranking of the United States remained the same. Notably, Thailand and Malaysia both improved in the ranking as the relative costs of travel and lodging decreased. When comparing relative surgical costs, there were greater swings in the rankings. United States based cataract surgery has potential to be the most costly as costs of the surgical procedure decreases sufficiently. In Germany and Mexico improve the rankings as the surgical costs decrease.
With soaring medical costs, we find that medical tourism is becoming a potential option for American patients with fiscal limitations. We find that unilateral cataract surgery in the United States is a low cost option for a patient living in the United States. Bilateral surgery that is trending more may be a valid and cost-effective option for a patient but personal and professional judgment should be used in each case.
| References|| |
Gupta V, Das P. Medical tourism in India. Clin Lab Med 2012;32:321-5.
Cataract in the Adult Eye. Preferred Practice Pattern. Vol. 116. American Academy of Ophthalmology; 2011. p. 678-84.
Home Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Home. CMS, nd Oct-Nov 2012. Available from: http://www.cms.gov/
. [Last accessed on 2013 May 3].
Zaidi FH, Corbett MC, Burton BJ, Bloo m PA. Raising the benchmark for the 21 st
century-the 1000 cataract operations audit and survey: Outcomes, consultant-supervised training and sourcing NHS choice. Br J Ophthalmol 2007;91:731-6.
Greenberg PB, Tseng VL, Wu WC, Liu J, Jiang L, Chen CK, et al
. Prevalence and predictors of ocular complications associated with cataract surgery in United States veterans. Ophthalmology 2011;118:507-14.
[Table 1], [Table 2]