|Year : 2014 | Volume
| Issue : 9 | Page : 917-922
Relationship between systemic hypertension, perfusion pressure and glaucoma: A comparative study in an adult Indian population
Amit K Deb1, Subashini Kaliaperumal1, Vasudev A Rao1, Sabyasachi Sengupta2
1 Department of Ophthalmology, Jawaharlal Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, Gorimedu, India
2 Vitreoretina Services, Aravind Eye Hospital, Thavalakuppam, Pondicherry, India
|Date of Submission||20-Jan-2014|
|Date of Acceptance||10-Jul-2014|
|Date of Web Publication||4-Nov-2014|
Amit K Deb
Plot No. 44, Raja Annamalai Nagar, Gorimedu Post, Puducherry - 605 006
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Aims: To study the relationship between blood pressure (BP), intraocular pressure (IOP), mean ocular perfusion pressure (MOPP) and primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) in patients with hypertension and compare it to a control group of normotensives. Design: Cross-sectional observational study. Materials and Methods: A total of 108 subjects with primary hypertension and 100 age-matched controls without hypertension were enrolled for the study. IOP measurement using Noncontact Tonometer and dilated fundus evaluation using + 90 D lens were done for all cases. Single recording of BP was taken. Gonioscopy, Humphrey's central visual fields, optical coherence tomography and pachymetry were done for all subjects with IOP > 21 mm Hg or C: D ratio ≥ 0.5 or asymmetry of > 0.2. Statistical Analysis: Univariate and multivariate multinomial regression models were used to determine the association between covariates and risk of glaucoma or glaucoma suspect. Results: There was no difference in the glaucoma status between subjects with and without hypertension. Subjects on antihypertensive medications were 1 times more likely to have suspicious glaucoma (odds ratio [OR] =1.56] and nearly twice as likely to have POAG (OR = 1.85). In addition, we found a 31% and 12% reduction in risk of having POAG (95% confidence interval [CI] =13-45%, P = 0.001) and glaucoma suspect (95% CI = 2-21%, P = 0.03) respectively with every 1 mm Hg increment in MOPP. Conclusion: Subjects on antihypertensive medications are more likely to have either glaucoma or glaucoma suspect, and higher ocular perfusion pressure offers relative protection from glaucomatous damage.
Keywords: ocular perfusion pressure, open-angle glaucoma, systemic hypertension
|How to cite this article:|
Deb AK, Kaliaperumal S, Rao VA, Sengupta S. Relationship between systemic hypertension, perfusion pressure and glaucoma: A comparative study in an adult Indian population
. Indian J Ophthalmol 2014;62:917-22
|How to cite this URL:|
Deb AK, Kaliaperumal S, Rao VA, Sengupta S. Relationship between systemic hypertension, perfusion pressure and glaucoma: A comparative study in an adult Indian population
. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2014 [cited 2020 May 25];62:917-22. Available from: http://www.ijo.in/text.asp?2014/62/9/917/143927
Glaucoma is a chronic progressive optic neuropathy characterized by retinal ganglion cell death and associated visual field loss.  The exact pathophysiological mechanism of optic nerve damage in glaucoma is not fully understood.  Besides the mechanical effect of raised intra ocular pressure (IOP) on optic nerve head (ONH),  several vascular risk factors such as systemic hypertension, atherosclerosis, vasospasm etc., have also been implicated as potential factors capable of increasing the risk of open-angle glaucoma (OAG). , The vascular hypothesis of OAG states that a low blood pressure (BP) relative to IOP can lead to low mean ocular perfusion pressure (MOPP), thus impairing perfusion of the ONH with resultant glaucomatous cupping and visual field loss. ,,,, Assessment of the diurnal fluctuations in IOP and MOPP is, therefore, clinically relevant in glaucoma patients.  Systemic hypertension as such may directly damage the small vessels of the optic disc and increase the risk of glaucoma. However, despite prior studies, the association between systemic hypertension, BP, or perfusion pressure and OAG remains unclear.  Understanding the relationship between these parameters is important to determine the risk factors influencing OAG development. This study examined a cohort of patients with systemic hypertension with the aim of studying its relationship with IOP and OAG and compared it to a control group of normotensives in an adult Indian population.
| Materials and Methods|| |
The study was carried out at the Department of Ophthalmology in a tertiary health care center in South India from August 2010 to March 2012. Ethical clearance was obtained from the Institutional Ethical Committee. It was a cross-sectional observational study consisting of two groups of subjects with and without systemic hypertension. Informed consent was obtained from all the subjects. Participants were recruited from a convenient sample of patients attending the outpatient department of the institute. Enrolled subjects were all above 40 years of age. The study group included 108 subjects with essential hypertension, either self-reported hypertension or newly diagnosed cases (defined as ≥140 mm Hg systolic BP [SBP] and/or ≥90 mm Hg diastolic BP [DBP]). Participants with hypertension due to secondary causes (endocrine or kidney disease/steroid induced) were excluded. Control group included 100 age and sex-matched subjects without hypertension. Each individual with hypertension was asked about the number of years of hypertension, details of antihypertensive medications and associated diabetes mellitus. Single measurement of BP was taken for all the subjects in the right upper arm in sitting position using a mercury sphygmomanometer (auscultatory technique using the first, and fifth phases of the Korotkoff sounds as per the American Heart Association BP measurement recommendations).  IOP was measured in both the eyes using a NonContact Tonometer (TOPCON CT-80) while dilated fundus examination was performed using a +90 D lens for all the subjects by two equally experienced observers. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) was calculated as DBP + 1/3 (SBP-DBP). MOPP was calculated using a standardized formula (MOPP = 2/3 × MAP-IOP). , All subjects with high IOP (>21 mm of Hg) or C: D ratio ≥ 0.5 or asymmetry of > 0.2 were further evaluated with Humphrey's central visual fields (24-2 SITA Standard Threshold protocol, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Germany), ultrasonic pachymetry, gonioscopy, optic disc photography and optical coherence tomography (OCT) - fast retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and ONH protocols of stratus OCT.
Primary OAG ( POAG) was diagnosed if glaucomatous cupping and characteristic field defects were present along with thinned RNFL and neuroretinal rim (NRR) on OCT and open angles on gonioscopy with or without raised IOP. The patient was classified as a glaucoma suspect if optic discs were suspicious, but IOP, RNFL thickness and visual fields were normal. If only IOP was >21 mm Hg with normal disc and fields, the patient was labeled as ocular hypertension.
Continuous data were presented as mean with a standard deviation and analyzed using Student's t-test or Mann-Whitney test. Chi-square or Fischer's exact test was used to compare the categorical variables. Association between IOP and BP was analyzed using age adjusted linear regression. Pearson's correlation coefficients (r) were used to analyze the relationships between IOP and BP and between MOPP and glaucoma status. Univariate and multivariate multinomial regression models were used to determine the association between covariates and risk of glaucoma or glaucoma suspect. Reference group included subjects without glaucoma. To determine the association between hypertension and its treatment on the glaucoma status, covariates included in Model 1 were age, gender, and presence of hypertension, antihypertensive medications and duration of diabetes. Model 2 was the same as Model 1 with the addition of MOPP and IOP to determine the association of these variables on glaucoma status.
All statistical analyses were carried out using Stata I/C version 12.0 (Stata Corp., College Station, TX) and P value < 0.05 was considered as significant.
| Results|| |
A total of 208 participants (108 in the hypertensive group and 100 in the control group) were included in our study. [Table 1] shows a comparison of the demographic parameters, BP and IOP of the subjects with and without hypertension. In the hypertensive group, IOP varied from 10 to 24 mm Hg with a mean IOP of 15.37 mm Hg ± 2.01 mm Hg (216 eyes of 108 patients). In the control group, IOP varied between 9 and 23 mm Hg with a mean IOP of 13.41 mm Hg ± 2.82 mm Hg (200 eyes of 100 participants). Using unpaired t-test, the means in the two groups were found to differ significantly (P < 0.0001). [Figure 1] shows the median IOP and the distribution of IOP between the two groups. Subjects with hypertension also had a significantly higher MOPP compared with the controls (P < 0.001) [Figure 2]. As the MOPP for both eyes are almost identical, we have shown the values for the right eye only in [Figure 2]. Fifteen (13.9%) subjects in the hypertensive group and seven (7%) in the control group were glaucoma suspects. There were no cases of ocular hypertension in either group. Seven (6.54%) subjects in the hypertensive group and three (3%) in the control group were diagnosed as POAG. There was no difference in the glaucoma status between subjects with and without hypertension (P = 0.15, Fischer's test).
|Table 1: Comparison of demographic, BP and IOP parameters between subjects with and without HTN|
Click here to view
|Figure 1: Box and Whisker plot showing distribution of IOP in both eyes in subjects with (n = 108) and without hypertension (n = 100)|
Click here to view
|Figure 2: Box and Whisker plot showing distribution of mean ocular perfusion pressure in right eye of subjects with (n = 108) and without hypertension (n = 100)|
Click here to view
In the hypertensive group, 48% subjects were on treatment with calcium channel blocker (amlodipine), 22% on angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (enalapril), 5% on β blocker (propranolol), 7% on multiple medications and the remaining 18% were on salt restricted diet.
Using age adjusted linear regression analysis, we observed 0.55 mm Hg rise in IOP per 10 mm Hg increment in SBP (95% confidence interval [CI] =0.28-0.83 mm Hg, P < 0.001) and 0.96 mm Hg rise in IOP per 10 mm Hg increment in DBP (95% CI = 0.49-1.43, P < 0.001). IOP was also seen to have a moderately positive correlation with MAP (r = 0.29) that was not statistically significant (P = 0.12). [Figure 3]a and b show this relation in both the eyes using a locally weighted scatter plot smoothening curve. MOPP showed a moderately negative but insignificant correlation with glaucoma status (r = −0.22, P = 0.18) [Figure 4].
|Figure 3: (a) Locally weighted scatter plot smoothening curve (unadjusted) showing relationship between mean arterial pressure and intra ocular pressure in right eye (n = 208 eyes). (b) Locally weighted scatter plot smoothening curve (unadjusted) showing relationship between mean arterial pressure and intra ocular pressure in left eye (n = 208 eyes)|
Click here to view
|Figure 4: Locally weighted scatter plot smoothening curve showing relationship between glaucoma status and mean ocular perfusion pressure across the entire sample. (The mean ocular perfusion pressure represents a mean of the mean ocular perfusion pressure in right eye and left eye for all the eyes in the study)|
Click here to view
Univariate multinomial regression analysis using "no glaucoma" as the comparison group showed a significant association between use of antihypertensive medications and glaucoma suspect status. Similarly, POAG was found to have a significant association with antihypertensive medications, MOPP and IOP [Table 2]. In multivariate multinomial regression adjusted for age, gender, hypertension status and duration of diabetes; subjects on antihypertensive medications were 1 times more likely to have suspicious glaucoma (odds ratio (OR) =1.56, 95% CI = 1.01-2.48, P = 0.05) and nearly twice more likely to have POAG (OR = 1.85, 95% CI = 0.92-3.7, P = 0.08). On adding MOPP and IOP to the above covariates, we found that treatment with antihypertensive medications had a stronger and more significant impact on both suspicious glaucoma (OR = 1.74, 95% CI = 1.05-2.87, P = 0.03) and POAG status (OR = 2.49. 95% CI = 1.00-6.21, P = 0.05). In addition, we found a 31% and 12% reduction in the risk of having POAG (95% CI = 13-45%, P = 0.001) and suspicious glaucoma (95% CI = 2-21%, P = 0.03) respectively with every 1 mm Hg increment in MOPP.
|Table 2: Univariate and multivariate multinomial regression analysis to determine the association between independent variables and glaucoma status (dependent variable) (n=208)|
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
In our study, we had found that the presence of systemic hypertension alone did not lead to the increased likelihood of having glaucoma or glaucoma suspect. Association between systemic hypertension and POAG has been evaluated in various population based studies that yield contradictory results. In the Blue Mountain Eye Study, a significant association was seen between hypertension and OAG. Association was strongest in those with poorly controlled hypertension (OAG prevalence 5.4%) as compared to those with normal BP (OAG prevalence 1.9%).  In the Egna-neumarkt study, the association was found between primary OAG and systemic hypertension.  A positive correlation was also found between systemic BP and IOP. In the Rotterdam study, however, the presence of systemic hypertension was not significantly associated with OAG, similar to our results.  Although hypertension was common in the Barbados Eye Study participants, it was unrelated to the prevalence of OAG.  Studies by Vijaya et al. in a rural and urban south Indian population similar to ours, found no association of POAG with systemic hypertension. ,
We found that subjects on antihypertensive medications had two- to three-fold increased likelihood of having glaucoma or glaucoma suspect. One potential reason may be related to the bedtime dosing of the antihypertensive medications which cause a drop in nocturnal BP and subsequent reduction in ONH perfusion. Pache and Flammer reported hypotension and in particular, a nocturnal drop in BP as an important risk factor for OAG.  Similarly, investigators from the Thessaloniki eye study  reported that DBP lower than 90 mm Hg resulting from antihypertensive treatment was associated with increased cupping and a decreased rim area of the optic disc, a finding confirmed by others. ,,,,, Contrary to this, Tokunaga et al. studied the association between visual field progression and nocturnal BP dip in normal-tension glaucoma (NTG) and high tension OAG patients.  Subjects were classified based on the percentage of nocturnal BP dip into nondippers (<10% drop), physiologic dippers (10-20% drop) and extreme dippers (>20% drop in BP). Visual field progression was evident in both the extreme dipper and the nondipper groups thus suggesting an underlying vascular dysregulation, and not merely nocturnal hypotension, as a contributory factor for glaucomatous damage.
Another possible explanation for the observed association between antihypertensive medications and OAG in our study is that the subjects on antihypertensive medications are likely to have more severe disease and hence, greater disruption of auto regulatory mechanisms of blood flow in the ONH. Chronically elevated BP results in arteriosclerosis, changes in the size of the precapillary arterioles and capillary dropout leading to increased resistance to blood flow and thus reduced perfusion. 
In our study, the mean IOP in the hypertensive group was significantly higher than those without hypertension. IOP was also seen to have a positive correlation with MAP. The Baltimore Eye Survey identified high IOP and systemic hypertension as potential risk factors in the development of glaucomatous optic nerve damage.  Other population based studies have reported an increase in IOP ranging from 0.16 to 0.52 mm Hg with every 10 mm Hg increment in systolic pressure, similar to our results, and 0.35-0.52 mm Hg for every 10 mm Hg increment in DBP. ,, The magnitude of the effect of DBP on IOP was slightly higher in our study with almost 1 mm Hg rise with every 10 mm Hg rise in DBP. This may reflect an overestimation of the effect and could partially be due to this being a clinic based study at a tertiary center, where subjects with advanced systemic disease are referred. The implications of the disturbed milieu between DBP, IOP and perfusion pressure is unknown and requires further study in the Indian population.
The perfusion parameters of the lamina cribrosa and NRR are implicated in various studies to be significantly correlated with visual field defects as measured with scanning laser Doppler flowmeter. , Oku et al. had found in a study that ONH ischemia could contribute to the enlargement and excavation of the disc cup independent of the IOP level.  In addition, circadian fluctuation of ocular perfusion pressure is an important contributing factor in the pathogenesis of glaucomatous optic neuropathy. , Increase in MOPP in our study, was associated with reduced risk of glaucoma in a dose dependent manner, that is, risk reduction was higher with POAG than with glaucoma suspect. In other words, lower the MOPP, greater the risk of developing glaucoma. Similar results were found in various studies on ocular perfusion pressure and its relation with glaucoma. Among various ocular perfusion pressure risk variables studied, 24-h MOPP fluctuation was found to be the most consistent clinical risk factor for determining glaucoma severity in patients with NTG.  Sehi et al. had demonstrated in a study that the percentage decrease in diurnal MOPP was significantly larger in patients with untreated POAG than in normal subjects, suggesting that relative diurnal change in MOPP may be a risk factor for POAG.  Two studies by Quaranta et al. on 24-h diastolic OPP (DOPP) fluctuations in newly diagnosed, untreated POAG patients have shown that the calculated DOPP peaked in the evening. , Similarly, a study by Costa et al. in two groups of healthy adults and POAG patients had shown that both groups had higher IOP values at night. In POAG patients, however, the night time IOP increase was accompanied by a simultaneous decrease in DBP, resulting in the reduction of DOPP.  Inadequate auto regulatory mechanisms in glaucoma patients could prevent maintenance of adequate blood flow in the face of nighttime changes in IOP and BP.  Choi et al. suggested that MOPP fluctuations may be a risk factor for NTG, as reductions of OPP may lead to short-term ocular tissue ischemia, followed by reperfusion injury and consequent loss of retinal ganglion cells.  Similar findings of increased risk of developing glaucoma with lower diastolic, systolic or mean perfusion pressures have been reported in various other population based studies. ,,,,,,
Calculation of mean OPP using theoretical formula may not reflect the real physiological status of ocular perfusion. Direct measurement of ocular blood flow could result in different outcomes. Furthermore, there are inevitable measurement inaccuracies during assessment of BP and IOP and also the scales of measurement differ (IOP values are in the range of 10-30 mm Hg while BP values approximate 100 mm Hg). Despite these limitations, several large studies have shown that calculated OPP is a highly relevant parameter in glaucoma.  We acknowledge that BP and IOP are both influenced by diurnal variations; therefore, having a single elevated/normal BP or IOP reading may not be representative of an individual's true BP or IOP status. Therefore, though tedious, a study carried out with 24 hours ambulatory BP monitoring and recording of diurnal variation of IOP may be more appropriate. Continuous IOP monitoring technologies are currently emerging that can contribute significantly to the study of IOP rhythms. ,, They may provide an invaluable tool toward a better understanding of long- and short-term IOP fluctuations.
A drawback of our study was that the C: D ratio was estimated by two different observers leading to a potential for inter-observer variability, which we did not adjust for in the analysis. Inter-observer variability in estimation of C: D ratio has been documented in various studies. ,,, In addition, we did not follow our patients for development or progression of glaucoma status. A longitudinal study to follow up the hypertensive and normotensive subjects with visual fields and other parameters to see for risk of glaucoma would be more appropriate. Ours was a hospital based study and hence the real incidence of glaucoma among hypertensives could be confounded.
| Conclusion|| |
The results of the present study suggest a potential role of MOPP in the pathogenesis of glaucoma in subjects on antihypertensive medications. It may be prudent to avoid night time administration of antihypertensive drugs in subjects with suspicious or proven OAG. However, longitudinal studies are further needed to confirm this.
| References|| |
Moore D, Harris A, Wudunn D, Kheradiya N, Siesky B. Dysfunctional regulation of ocular blood flow: A risk factor for glaucoma? Clin Ophthalmol 2008;2:849-61.
Omoti AE, Enock ME, Okeigbemen VW, Akpe BA, Fuh UC. Vascular risk factors for open angle glaucoma in African eyes. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol 2009;16:146-50.
Flammer J, Orgül S, Costa VP, Orzalesi N, Krieglstein GK, Serra LM, et al
. The impact of ocular blood flow in glaucoma. Prog Retin Eye Res 2002;21:359-93.
Deokule S, Weinreb RN. Relationships among systemic blood pressure, intraocular pressure, and open-angle glaucoma. Can J Ophthalmol 2008;43:302-7.
Caprioli J, Coleman AL, Blood Flow in Glaucoma Discussion. Blood pressure, perfusion pressure, and glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 2010;149:704-12.
Topouzis F, Founti P. Weighing in ocular perfusion pressure in managing glaucoma. Open Ophthalmol J 2009;3:43-5.
Leske MC. Ocular perfusion pressure and glaucoma: Clinical trial and epidemiologic findings. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2009;20:73-8.
Hayreh SS. Blood flow in the optic nerve head and factors that may influence it. Prog Retin Eye Res 2001;20:595-624.
Quaranta L, Katsanos A, Russo A, Riva I 24-hour intraocular pressure and ocular perfusion pressure in glaucoma. Surv Ophthalmol 2013;58:26-41.
Kurtz TW, Griffin KA, Bidani AK, Davisson RL, Hall JE, Subcommittee of Professional and Public Education of the American Heart Association. Recommendations for blood pressure measurement in humans and experimental animals. Part 2: Blood pressure measurement in experimental animals: A statement for professionals from the subcommittee of professional and public education of the American Heart Association council on high blood pressure research. Hypertension 2005;45:299-310.
Choi J, Jeong J, Cho HS, Kook MS. Effect of nocturnal blood pressure reduction on circadian fluctuation of mean ocular perfusion pressure: A risk factor for normal tension glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47:831-6.
Sung KR, Lee S, Park SB, Choi J, Kim ST, Yun SC, et al.
Twenty-four hour ocular perfusion pressure fluctuation and risk of normal-tension glaucoma progression. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009;50:5266-74.
Mitchell P, Lee AJ, Rochtchina E, Wang JJ. Open-angle glaucoma and systemic hypertension: The blue mountains eye study. J Glaucoma 2004;13:319-26.
Bonomi L, Marchini G, Marraffa M, Bernardi P, Morbio R, Varotto A. Vascular risk factors for primary open angle glaucoma: The Egna-Neumarkt Study. Ophthalmology 2000;107:1287-93.
Hulsman CA, Vingerling JR, Hofman A, Witteman JC, de Jong PT. Blood pressure, arterial stiffness, and open-angle glaucoma: The Rotterdam study. Arch Ophthalmol 2007;125:805-12.
Leske MC, Connell AM, Wu SY, Hyman LG, Schachat AP. Risk factors for open-angle glaucoma. The Barbados Eye Study. Arch Ophthalmol 1995;113:918-24.
Vijaya L, George R, Baskaran M, Arvind H, Raju P, Ramesh SV, et al.
Prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma in an urban south Indian population and comparison with a rural population. The Chennai Glaucoma Study. Ophthalmology 2008;115:648-54.e1.
Vijaya L, George R, Paul PG, Baskaran M, Arvind H, Raju P, et al.
Prevalence of open-angle glaucoma in a rural south Indian population. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005;46:4461-7.
Pache M, Flammer J. A sick eye in a sick body? Systemic findings in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma. Surv Ophthalmol 2006;51:179-212.
Topouzis F, Coleman AL, Harris A, Jonescu-Cuypers C, Yu F, Mavroudis L, et al.
Association of blood pressure status with the optic disk structure in non-glaucoma subjects: The Thessaloniki eye study. Am J Ophthalmol 2006;142:60-7.
Hayreh SS, Zimmerman MB, Podhajsky P, Alward WL. Nocturnal arterial hypotension and its role in optic nerve head and ocular ischemic disorders. Am J Ophthalmol 1994;117:603-24.
Béchetoille A, Bresson-Dumont H. Diurnal and nocturnal blood pressure drops in patients with focal ischemic glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1994;232:675-9.
Graham SL, Drance SM, Wijsman K, Douglas GR, Mikelberg FS. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in glaucoma. The nocturnal dip. Ophthalmology 1995;102:61-9.
Meyer JH, Brandi-Dohrn J, Funk J. Twenty four hour blood pressure monitoring in normal tension glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 1996;80:864-7.
Tokunaga T, Kashiwagi K, Tsumura T, Taguchi K, Tsukahara S. Association between nocturnal blood pressure reduction and progression of visual field defect in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or normal-tension glaucoma. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2004;48:380-5.
Graham SL, Drance SM. Nocturnal hypotension: Role in glaucoma progression. Surv Ophthalmol 1999;43 Suppl 1:S10-6.
Memarzadeh F, Ying-Lai M, Chung J, Azen SP, Varma R, Los Angeles Latino Eye Study Group. Blood pressure, perfusion pressure, and open-angle glaucoma: The Los Angeles Latino Eye Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010;51:2872-7.
Sommer A. Glaucoma risk factors observed in the Baltimore Eye Survey. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 1996;7:93-8.
Klein BE, Klein R, Knudtson MD. Intraocular pressure and systemic blood pressure: Longitudinal perspective: The Beaver Dam Eye Study. Br J Ophthalmol 2005;89:284-7.
Tielsch JM, Katz J, Sommer A, Quigley HA, Javitt JC. Hypertension, perfusion pressure, and primary open-angle glaucoma. A population-based assessment. Arch Ophthalmol 1995;113:216-21.
Findl O, Rainer G, Dallinger S, Dorner G, Polak K, Kiss B, et al.
Assessment of optic disk blood flow in patients with open-angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 2000;130:589-96.
Ciancaglini M, Carpineto P, Costagliola C, Matropasqua L. Perfusion of the optic nerve head and visual field damage in glaucomatous patients. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2001;239:549-55.
Oku H, Sugiyama T, Kojima S, Watanabe T, Azuma I. Experimental optic cup enlargement caused by endothelin-1-induced chronic optic nerve head ischemia. Surv Ophthalmol 1999;44 Suppl 1:S74-84.
Choi J, Kim KH, Jeong J, Cho HS, Lee CH, Kook MS. Circadian fluctuation of mean ocular perfusion pressure is a consistent risk factor for normal-tension glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007;48:104-11.
Sehi M, Flanagan JG, Zeng L, Cook RJ, Trope GE. Relative change in diurnal mean ocular perfusion pressure: A risk factor for the diagnosis of primary open-angle glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005;46:561-7.
Quaranta L, Gandolfo F, Turano R, Rovida F, Pizzolante T, Musig A, et al.
Effects of topical hypotensive drugs on circadian IOP, blood pressure, and calculated diastolic ocular perfusion pressure in patients with glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47:2917-23.
Quaranta L, Miglior S, Floriani I, Pizzolante T, Konstas AG. Effects of the timolol-dorzolamide fixed combination and latanoprost on circadian diastolic ocular perfusion pressure in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008;49:4226-31.
Costa VP, Jimenez-Roman J, Carrasco FG, Lupinacci A, Harris A Twenty-four-hour ocular perfusion pressure in primary open-angle glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 2010;94:1291-4.
Zheng Y, Wong TY, Mitchell P, Friedman DS, He M, Aung T. Distribution of ocular perfusion pressure and its relationship with open-angle glaucoma: The Singapore Malay eye study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010;51:3399-404.
De Smedt S, Mermoud A, Schnyder C 24-hour intraocular pressure fluctuation monitoring using an ocular telemetry sensor: Tolerability and functionality in healthy subjects. J Glaucoma 2012;21:539-44.
Kakaday T, Hewitt AW, Voelcker NH, Li JS, Craig JE. Advances in telemetric continuous intraocular pressure assessment. Br J Ophthalmol 2009;93:992-6.
Mansouri K, Shaarawy T. Continuous intraocular pressure monitoring with a wireless ocular telemetry sensor: Initial clinical experience in patients with open angle glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 2011;95:627-9.
Arnalich-Montiel F, Muñoz-Negrete FJ, Rebolleda G, Sales-Sanz M, Cabarga C. Cup-to-disc ratio: Agreement between slit-lamp indirect ophthalmoscopic estimation and stratus optical coherence tomography measurement. Eye (Lond) 2007;21:1041-9.
Teitelbaum BA, Haefs R, Connor D. Interobserver variability in the estimation of the cup/disk ratio among observers of differing educational background. Optometry 2001;72:729-32.
Hanson S, Krishnan SK, Phillips J. Observer experience and cup: Disc ratio assessment. Optom Vis Sci 2001;78:701-5.
Paunescu LA, Schuman JS, Price LL, Stark PC, Beaton S, Ishikawa H, et al.
Reproducibility of nerve fiber thickness, macular thickness, and optic nerve head measurements using Stratus OCT. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004;45:1716-24.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]
[Table 1], [Table 2]