|Year : 2015 | Volume
| Issue : 10 | Page : 788-790
Changes in stereoacuity following implantable Collamer lens implantation in patients with myopia
Sudarshan Khokhar, Shikha Gupta, Varun Gogia, Ruchir Tewari, Tushar Agarwal
Department of Ophthalmology, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
|Date of Submission||19-May-2015|
|Date of Acceptance||20-Aug-2015|
|Date of Web Publication||10-Dec-2015|
Dr. Shikha Gupta
Dr. Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi - 110 029
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
The study evaluated the impact of implantable Collamer lens (ICL) implantation on stereoacuity in myopes in a retrospective case series. Ninety-five eyes of 48 patients were recruited. Distance and near stereoacuity were measured using distance Randot stereotest and TNO test, respectively, before surgery and at 4 weeks postoperatively. Mean age of the patients was 23.67 ± 3.7 years. Mean uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) was 1.28 ± 0.37 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) (median: 1.3; range: 0.3-1.8), and median best-corrected distance visual acuity (BDVA) was 0.18 logMAR (range: 0-0.6). There was a significant improvement in both UDVA and BDVA postsurgery (P < 0.001; Wilcoxon signed rank test). The overall improvement in stereopsis was observed in 15/48 (31.25%) and 13/48 (27.10%) subjects for near and distance, respectively, with no significant difference between the two (P = 0.82; Fisher's exact test). Among stereoblind individuals, the odd's ratio for near stereoacuity to improve in comparison to distance stereoacuity was 8.85 (95% confidence interval: 1.68-46.70; P = 0.01). ICL implantation for refractive correction aided stereoacuity improvement in myopes more so for near.
Keywords: Implantable Collamer lens, myopia, stereoacuity, stereoblind
|How to cite this article:|
Khokhar S, Gupta S, Gogia V, Tewari R, Agarwal T. Changes in stereoacuity following implantable Collamer lens implantation in patients with myopia. Indian J Ophthalmol 2015;63:788-90
|How to cite this URL:|
Khokhar S, Gupta S, Gogia V, Tewari R, Agarwal T. Changes in stereoacuity following implantable Collamer lens implantation in patients with myopia. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2015 [cited 2020 Jun 2];63:788-90. Available from: http://www.ijo.in/text.asp?2015/63/10/788/171510
Stereopsis is the finest element of binocular vision which develops in an infant at around 4 months of birth.  It is the ability to perceive depth and objects in a three-dimensional (3D) space. Defocus, misalignment of the two eyes, or altered perception due to media opacity can lead to altered and diminished stereopsis. High refractive errors, thus, are an important cause of diminished stereopsis due to blurred vision despite best correction.  Various studies in literature show that stereopsis improves after keratorefractive procedures in children as well as adults. ,, Phakic intraocular lens (pIOL) surgery helps correct treatable ametropia, provides stable refraction, and better visual outcomes.  There is no clear evidence as to whether it helps to improve stereoacuity in myopes. Hence, this study was envisaged to assess the change in stereopsis following implantable Collamer lens (ICL) implantation in myopes.
| Materials and Methods|| |
The retrospective study adhered to the tenets of Declaration of Helsinki. The data were collected from the records of patients presenting to outpatient department for pIOL surgery for myopia. The inclusion criteria for the ICL implantation were preoperative best-corrected distance visual acuity (BDVA) of 6/24 (Snellen equivalent) or better, stable refraction for at least 1 year and a clear central cornea with myopia or myopic astigmatism. The exclusion criteria included the age younger than 18 years, anterior chamber depth <2.8 mm (as measured on Pentacam), endothelial cell density <2000 cells/mm 2 , white to white measurement <10 mm (as measured on Orbscan II), presence of cataract, glaucoma, unlasered thinning, breaks or retinal detachment, macular degeneration or retinopathy, a past history of any episode of ocular inflammation, patients with severe dry eyes, or those corneal opacity or irregularity. Staar Visian ICL (Walker Avenue, California, USA) was implanted using the prescribed protocol by the same surgeon. Pre- and post-operative visual acuity (Snellen equivalent converted to logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution), stereoacuity, refractive error (spherical, cylindrical, and spherical equivalent), and degree of anisometropia (algebraic difference of the spherical equivalent between the two eyes) were analyzed.
Visual acuity was recorded postoperatively at day 1, day 8, and 4 weeks. Stereoacuity was tested with best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and was recorded at 4 weeks of follow-up. Distance Randot stereotest (Stereo Optical Co., Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was administered while wearing polarizing glasses by trained masked optometrists at 3 m for distance stereopsis (range 400-60 arcsec). Near stereoacuity was measured using the TNO test (Lameris Instrumenten b.v., Utrecht, The Netherlands) and was administered at 40 cm using red, green anaglyphic filters.
Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 20 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). For the purpose of analysis in the absence of actual quantitative value of stereoacuity tests for gross and null stereopsis, categorization of stereopsis was done into three categories as fine stereopsis (<480 on TNO and < 400 arcsec on distance Randot stereotest), gross stereopsis (>500 arcsec on TNO and 700-2000 arcsec on distance Randot), and null stereopsis (nonmeasurable stereopsis on test). McNemar's test was applied for calculating differences in frequency between the paired nominal data of stereoacuity categories pre- and post-operatively. One eye was considered for the analysis of visual acuity. Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to calculate significance levels for the difference before and after surgery. Two sample paired t-test was applied to calculate the relationship among change in stereoacuity with change in visual acuity, spherical equivalent, and anisometropia. Differences were considered statistically significant when P value was <0.05.
| Results|| |
Of the 48 patients operated, 19 were males and 29 were females. All patients were operated bilaterally, except one who had unilateral myopia (total of 95 eyes). The surgery and postsurgical course were uneventful in all eyes except in one eye, which showed raised intraocular pressure postoperatively, for that augmentation of Yag iridotomy had to be performed. The mean spherical error was −9.9 ± 5.5 D (range: −1 to − 19), and the mean cylindrical error was −1.11 ± 1.7 D (range: −6 to 0 D). The average spherical equivalent of the population was − 10.49 ± 5.69 D (range: −2.75 to − 21 D). [Table 1] shows the preoperative and postoperative outcomes of the study population.
|Table 1: Pre- and post-operative demographic data of patients undergoing ICL surgery |
Click here to view
There was a significant improvement in visual acuity (both uncorrected distance visual acuity and BDVA) as compared to preoperative levels (P < 0.001; Wilcoxon signed rank test). There was a significant improvement in stereoacuity for both near (P = 0.001) and distance (P = 0.0005) (McNemar's test). The difference (two-sample paired t-test) was not found to be statistically significant for change in near stereoacuity with change in UCVA (P = 0.3), BCVA (P = 0.8), spherical equivalent (P = 0.8), and anisometropia (P = 0.5). The change in numbers of distance stereoacuity postoperatively did not allow a similar analysis for distance stereopsis. Graphs depicting the change in stereoacuity for near and distance are included in [Figure 1]a and b.
|Figure 1: (a) Graph showing change in near stereoacuity pre-and post-operatively. (b) Graph showing change in distance stereoacuity pre-and post-operatively (values in sec represents arc seconds)|
Click here to view
The overall improvement in stereopsis was observed in 15/48 (31.25%) and 13/48 (27.10%) subjects for near and distance, respectively, with no significant difference between the two (P = 0.82; Fisher's exact test) [Table 2]. Improvement of stereoacuity among the stereoblind subjects was observed in 10/12 (83.33%) and 13/36 (36.11%) for near and distance, respectively [Figure 1]a and b. There was a significantly greater improvement of near stereopsis in stereoblind subjects when compared with distance stereopsis (P = 0.007; Fisher's exact test). The odd's ratio for near stereoacuity to improve in comparison to distance stereoacuity among the stereoblinds was 8.85 (95% confidence interval: 1.68-46.70; P = 0.01).
|Table 2: The change in stereoacuity pre- and post-operatively when divided into the categories nonrecordable, gross, and fine stereoacuity |
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
In our series, the patients registered a significant improvement in both near and distance stereopsis postsurgery (P < 0.001). There are only anecdotal reports in literature describing the improvement in stereopsis following posterior chamber pIOLs implantation. , However, these studies were limited by reporting outcome for change in stereopsis in a small number of patients that were treated for varied refractive errors, at differing age and with different types of pIOL. , This may suggest that stereopsis is susceptible to recovery even later in adulthood if appropriate visual rehabilitation is offered. Enhanced stereoacuity postsurgery could be due to the greater retinal magnification of images (11-47%) at intraocular plane versus that at the spectacle plane, corresponding to an improved BDVA of 0.4 and 1.8 lines.  Other factors include the elimination of prismatic effect of spectacles, enhanced quality of vision in both eyes, correction of anisometropia, and infrequent use of glasses preoperatively. 
The absence of any relationship of stereoacuity with anisometropia could be due to low degree of anisometropia in our patients (median 0.87 D) as anisometropia >3D has the maximum potential to create blur and affect stereoacuity.  About 84% and 37% patients who were stereoblind for near and distance, respectively, improved following surgery. The greater probability (×8.84) of near stereoacuity to improve than distance may be because myopes have a good near vision despite having a poor distant vision.
Some of the limitations of our study merit mention. These include a small sample size and short follow-up duration. We used stereotests with fixed disparities that could not establish a stereoscopic threshold. Further, stereoscopic disparity was measured dichoptically using two different principles, that is, polaroid vectograph-based and anaglyph-based principles for distance and near stereoacuity, respectively. It could have resulted in slight differences in accuracy while comparing the distance and near stereo acuities obtained in this study. Both the tests used global stereopsis only. Moreover, patients with low, pre- and post-operative BCVA could also have confounded the results in not producing improvement in stereoacuity. Nevertheless, this is the only study that sought the impact of ICL implantation on the change in stereoacuity in myopia. To conclude, ICL implantation aids in improving stereoacuity postoperatively. It may be utilized as a therapeutic procedure for poor stereopsis preoperatively in certain sportspersons, e.g. in athletes, shooters, car racers. Near stereopsis may be more amenable to the treatment than distance stereoacuity.
We would like to thank Mrs. Veena Pandey and Prof. R.M. Pandey who helped in the statistical analysis of the paper.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Birch EE, Gwiazda J, Held R. The development of vergence does not account for the onset of stereopsis. Perception 1983;12:331-6.
Brooks SE, Johnson D, Fischer N. Anisometropia and binocularity. Ophthalmology 1996;103:1139-43.
Razmjoo H, Akhlaghi MR, Dehghani AR, Peyman AR, Sari-Mohammadli M, Ghatreh-Samani H. Stereoacuity following LASIK. J Ophthalmic Vis Res 2008;3:28-31.
Paysse EA, Coats DK, Hussein MA, Hamill MB, Koch DD. Long-term outcomes of photorefractive keratectomy for anisometropic amblyopia in children. Ophthalmology 2006;113:169-76.
Autrata R, Rehurek J. Clinical results of excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy for high myopic anisometropia in children: Four-year follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003;29:694-702.
Huang D, Schallhorn SC, Sugar A, Farjo AA, Majmudar PA, Trattler WB, et al.
Phakic intraocular lens implantation for the correction of myopia: A report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology 2009;116:2244-58.
Godts D, Trau R, Tassignon MJ. Effect of refractive surgery on binocular vision and ocular alignment in patients with manifest or intermittent strabismus. Br J Ophthalmol 2006;90:1410-3.
BenEzra D, Cohen E, Karshai I. Phakic posterior chamber intraocular lens for the correction of anisometropia and treatment of amblyopia. Am J Ophthalmol 2000;130:292-6.
García M, González C, Pascual I, Fimia A. Magnification and visual acuity in highly myopic phakic eyes corrected with an anterior chamber intraocular lens versus by other methods. J Cataract Refract Surg 1996;22:1416-22.
Tomaç S, Birdal E. Effects of anisometropia on binocularity. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 2001;38:27-33.
[Table 1], [Table 2]