|Year : 2015 | Volume
| Issue : 10 | Page : 798-800
Nonpseudomonal ecthyma gangrenosum of the upper lid treated with lid reconstruction
S Praveen Kumar1, K V Praveen Kumar1, Subashini Kaliaperumal1, Arjun Ashokan2
1 Department of Ophthalmology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India
2 Department of Plastic Surgery, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India
|Date of Submission||25-Feb-2015|
|Date of Acceptance||09-Sep-2015|
|Date of Web Publication||10-Dec-2015|
Dr. K V Praveen Kumar
Department of Ophthalmology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry - 605 006
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Ecthyma gangrenosum (EG) is a cutaneous infection which usually occurs in immunocompromised patients. We report a case of EG of the eyelid treated with escharotomy and skin grafting, highlighting the importance of surgical management. A 2-year-old Asian Indian female presented to us with right upper lid edema with a large necrotic area. The child received intravenous cefotaxime for a week and the necrotic area turned to a well-defined eschar. Escharotomy with wound debridement and skin grafting was done. The present case highlights the importance of surgical intervention to prevent the sequelae of scarring of upper lid.
Keywords: Ecthyma, lid necrosis, skin graft
|How to cite this article:|
Kumar S P, Kumar KP, Kaliaperumal S, Ashokan A. Nonpseudomonal ecthyma gangrenosum of the upper lid treated with lid reconstruction. Indian J Ophthalmol 2015;63:798-800
|How to cite this URL:|
Kumar S P, Kumar KP, Kaliaperumal S, Ashokan A. Nonpseudomonal ecthyma gangrenosum of the upper lid treated with lid reconstruction. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2015 [cited 2020 May 29];63:798-800. Available from: http://www.ijo.in/text.asp?2015/63/10/798/171522
Ecthyma gangrenosum (EG) is an uncommon manifestation, occurring secondary to cutaneous infection from either hematogenous seeding of a pathogen or direct inoculation through the skin. EG usually occurs in immunocompromised and critically ill patients.  Although Pseudomonas is the most common cause of EG, a variety of other bacteria and fungi has been implicated. , The skin lesions occur in the gluteal and perineal regions (57%) or extremities (30%). Facial involvement is reported to occur in about 6% of cases which can lead to skin defects needing reconstruction.  Periorbital involvement in EG is rare.  We report a case of EG of the right upper eyelid in a young child treated with escharotomy with full thickness skin grafting, highlighting the importance of surgical management in the treatment of EG.
| Case Report|| |
A 2-year-old Asian Indian female presented to us with mild fever and swelling of the right upper lid of 10 days duration. There was no history of diarrhea prior to the onset of the symptoms. There was no history of preceding viral illness or significant medical history necessitating treatment with antibiotics. She was previously treated with oral antibiotics and drainage of the vesicle fluid. Subsequently, edema and blackish discoloration of the right upper eye lid developed. Cutaneous anthrax was unlikely as there was no history of unexplained cattle death in her environment. On examination, the child had low-grade fever and there were no other skin lesions. Ophthalmological examination revealed right upper lid edema with a large black necrotic area of the lid which was adherent to the underlying tissues. There was surrounding erythema and edema with no discharge [Figure 1]. The anterior segment examination was within normal limits. Left eye examination was unremarkable. The child was examined by a pediatrician to rule out any other focus of infection. Dermatological consultation yielded a diagnosis of EG clinically. Microscopic examination of the skin biopsy revealed staphylococci and hence cutaneous anthrax was ruled out. Blood cultures were negative. The child was started on intravenous cefotaxime for a week with resolution of fever and the necrotic area turned to a well-defined eschar with no edema and induration. After 2 weeks, the child underwent escharotomy with wound debridement and full thickness skin graft from the groin [Figure 2]. Under general anesthesia, the groin area was cleaned and draped. The skin was harvested from the groin under strict sterile aseptic precautions. The eschar on the lid was found to be partial thickness, was excised in toto, and the wound margins were debrided. The harvested skin was placed over the lid defect and sutured with 6-0 prolene. The graft took well and suture removal was done after 1 week [Figure 3].
|Figure 1: Clinical photograph of the child showing large black necrotic area of the right upper lid adherent to the underlying tissues with surrounding erythema and edema and no discharge|
Click here to view
|Figure 2: Immediate postoperative clinical photograph showing full thickness skin graft from the groin|
Click here to view
|Figure 3: Postoperative photograph at 1 week showing healthy well-taken graft|
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
Bacterial invasion of the arteries in the dermis and subcutaneous tissues produces a necrotizing vasculitis. The characteristic clinical appearance of EG is a red macule that progresses to a nodular or ulcerative lesion with central area of necrosis surrounded by erythema. EG can be observed to progress through several clinical stages. The initial stage of erythema and edema is followed by painful vesicle formation. Bullae develop subsequently and become filled with mucopurulent or serosanguinous fluid. In the end stage, the lesions become hemorrhagic and slough off, leading to a necrotic eschar. Progression through these stages is rapid, typically occurring within 12-24 h.  There are few reports of this condition developing in healthy individuals without any predisposing factors.
Usually, EG is associated with bacteremia, but can also occur in the absence of it.  Classic EG rarely involves the periocular tissues and to our knowledge, only a few such cases have been described in the literature. Maccheron et al. presented a case of EG that led to orbital cellulitis and panophthalmitis.  Watson and Sloan described a case of EG secondary to Pseudomonas dacryocystitis.  Inamadar et al. described a diabetic individual who developed severe periorbital EG after suffering a laceration to the forehead.  Ghosheh and Kathuria reported a case of bilateral periorbital EG in a diabetic male with renal failure.  The mortality rate in nonsepticemic cases varies between 0% and 15% compared with 20-96% for those associated with septicemia. 
Our patient had unilateral EG secondary to staphylococcal infection. She had no bacteremia. The closest differential diagnosis in our case was necrotizing fasciitis, but on the basis of clinical features and negative blood cultures, a diagnosis of EG was entertained in this case. The diagnosis of necrotizing fasciitis depends on clinical features, blood cultures, and Gram stain to identify causative organisms and these patients usually have septicemia with positive blood cultures.  The eschar formed following antibiotic administration was a full thickness eschar adherent to surrounding tissues and the lesion caused ectropion and mechanical ptosis, which blocked the pupil. Considering the possible complications of scarring including entropion or ectropion, trichiasis, corneal exposure, and amblyopia in the child, surgical intervention was indicated. To the best of our knowledge, there are no reports of skin grafting being done as a treatment modality for EG.
Our patient was atypical in that EG was due to methicillin-resistant staphylococcal infection in contrast to all the four reports where there was Pseudomonas infection. Our child had better survival with good postoperative outcomes because there was no bacteremia. The case also highlights the need of early surgical intervention in such circumstances so as the probable sequelae of scarring of upper eye lid, resulting in mechanical ptosis which can result in stimulus deprivation amblyopia can be prevented.
Declaration of patient consent
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Chang AY, Carlos CA, Schuster M, Xu X, Rosenbach M. Nonpseudomonal ecthyma gangrenosum associated with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
infection: A case report and review of the literature. Cutis 2012;90:67-9.
Reich HL, Williams Fadeyi D, Naik NS, Honig PJ, Yan AC. Nonpseudomonal ecthyma gangrenosum. J Am Acad Dermatol 2004;50 5 Suppl: S114-7.
Bodey GP, Bolivar R, Fainstein V, Jadeja L. Infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa
. Rev Infect Dis 1983;5:279-313.
Özkaya Ö, Üsçetin I, Egemen O, Bingöl D, Akan M. Reconstructive procedure of lower lip defect due to ecthyma gangrenosum - A rare complication of acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Craniofac Surg 2012;23:e182-4.
Ghosheh FR, Kathuria SS. Bilateral periorbital ecthyma gangrenosum. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;22:492-3.
Huminer D, Siegman-Igra Y, Morduchowicz G, Pitlik SD. Ecthyma gangrenosum without bacteremia. Report of six cases and review of the literature. Arch Intern Med 1987;147:299-301.
Maccheron LJ, Groeneveld ER, Ohlrich SJ, Hilford DJ, Beckingsale PS. Orbital cellulitis, panophthalmitis, and ecthyma gangrenosum in an immunocompromised host with Pseudomonas
septicemia. Am J Ophthalmol 2004;137:176-8.
Watson A, Sloan B. Ecthyma gangrenosum arising from Pseudomonas aeruginosa
dacryocystitis. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2003;31:366-8.
Inamadar AC, Palit A, Athanikar SB, Sampagavi VV, Deshmukh NS. Periocular ecthyma gangrenosum in a diabetic patient. Br J Dermatol 2003;148:821.
Salcido RS. Necrotizing fasciitis: Reviewing the causes and treatment strategies. Adv Skin Wound Care 2007;20:288-93.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]