Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 3820
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

   Table of Contents      
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Year : 2015  |  Volume : 63  |  Issue : 11  |  Page : 875

Response to: Comparison of clinical outcomes, patient, and surgeon satisfaction following topical versus peribulbar anesthesia for phacoemulsification: A randomized controlled trial


1 H V Desai Eye Hospital, Pune, India
2 King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Date of Web Publication16-Dec-2015

Correspondence Address:
Kuldeep Dole
HV Desai Eye Hospital, Pune
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0301-4738.171981

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Dole K, Kulkarni S, Shisode K, Deshpande R, Kakade N, Khandekar R, Deshpande M. Response to: Comparison of clinical outcomes, patient, and surgeon satisfaction following topical versus peribulbar anesthesia for phacoemulsification: A randomized controlled trial. Indian J Ophthalmol 2015;63:875

How to cite this URL:
Dole K, Kulkarni S, Shisode K, Deshpande R, Kakade N, Khandekar R, Deshpande M. Response to: Comparison of clinical outcomes, patient, and surgeon satisfaction following topical versus peribulbar anesthesia for phacoemulsification: A randomized controlled trial. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2015 [cited 2020 Sep 26];63:875. Available from: http://www.ijo.in/text.asp?2015/63/11/875/171981

Dear Sir,

 We thank the reader for raising queries and the editor for giving us the opportunity to respond to these queries. [1]

Please find each query and its reply;

Question 1: Randomization: Allotment and masking? Whether surgeons chose their anesthesia.

Answer 1: The randomization schedule for each surgeon was generated by  EpiTable software for 1000 cataract surgeries. [2] Each patient was randomly assigned to either topical or peribulbar route of anesthesia by opening an envelope on entering the recovery (preanesthetic) room. Patients were explained about both the routes of anesthesia, and that they would undergo cataract surgery by use of any one of these two routes. A written informed consent was obtained. Patients refusing to consent were excluded from the study. The randomization was not equal due to surgeons not being present in operation theater at times, patients refusal, and patients who could not bear topical anesthesia.

Question 2: Time of surgery?

Answer 2: In peribulbar group, the surgery was done about 7-8 min after injection; in topical group, the drops were instilled 5 min before surgery and repeated just before commencing surgery.

Question 3: Conjunctival congestion more in peribulbar?

Answer 3: Subconjunctival hemorrhage occurring in the topical group was mainly due to forceps trauma in few cases with poor akinesia led to conjunctival congestion. They were more in topical anesthesia group.

Question 4: Visual acuity why after 4-6 weeks? Few hours more imp

Answer 4: Day 1 visual acuity comparison was done with respect to surgeons and cataract grade and day 1 visual acuity did not differ significantly in the two groups. However, cases of the topical group are having better vision but the difference was not statistically significant.

Question 5: Pain Scale: Likert scale? Purely subjective? Intraoperative discomfort more in peribulbar group? How was it asked?

Answer 5: Pain score grading was done using a scale wherein patients were asked to grade score of the pain on a scale of 1-10. It was subjective in nature. We inquired about intraoperative discomfort soon after completing the surgery. Intraoperative discomfort more in peribulbar group. We have not mentioned this in the paper.

We agree with the observations made that topical anesthesia is suitable to a certain group of patients, and that is the reason we had certain inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
  References Top

1.
Dole K, Kulkarni S, Shisode KD, Deshpande R, Kakade N, Khandekar R, et al. Comparison of clinical outcomes, patient, and surgeon satisfaction following topical versus peribulbar anesthesia for phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation: A randomized, controlled trial. Indian J Ophthalmol 2014;62:927-30.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
2.
Dean AG, Sullivan KM, Soe MM. OpenEpi: Open Source Epidemiologic Statistics for Public Health, Version. www.OpenEpi.com, updated 2015/05/04, [Last accessed on 2015 Dec 01].  Back to cited text no. 2
    




 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1603    
    Printed7    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded142    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal