Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 10361
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

   Table of Contents      
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Year : 2015  |  Volume : 63  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 79-80

Comment on Repeat gas insufflation for successful closure of idiopathic macular hole following failed primary surgery


Dr. Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, AIIMS, New Delhi, India

Date of Web Publication16-Feb-2015

Correspondence Address:
Vinod Kumar
Vitreo-retina Services, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Centre, AIIMS, New Delhi - 110 0 29
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0301-4738.151494

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Takkar B, Bhatia I, Attiku Y, Kumar V. Comment on Repeat gas insufflation for successful closure of idiopathic macular hole following failed primary surgery. Indian J Ophthalmol 2015;63:79-80

How to cite this URL:
Takkar B, Bhatia I, Attiku Y, Kumar V. Comment on Repeat gas insufflation for successful closure of idiopathic macular hole following failed primary surgery. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2015 [cited 2020 May 26];63:79-80. Available from: http://www.ijo.in/text.asp?2015/63/1/79/151494

Dear Sir,

We read with interest the article "repeat gas insufflation for successful closure of idiopathic macular hole following failed primary surgery " by Rishi et al. [1] While managing such situations is indeed a challenge, we made few observations.

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) shows presence of "inner retinal dimpling" seen prominently temporal to the fovea after the first procedure. In fact, this dimpling seems to have increased after the repeat macular surgery. Previously named dissociation of optic nerve fiber layer, [2] these are now considered to be due to an interplay between trauma and healing processes constrained by nerve fiber layer and not because of dissociation of optic nerve fibers. [3] It is believed that this morphological pattern observed late after inner limiting membrane (ILM) peeling (after 1-3 months) represents traction caused on the Muller cell end plates during the peeling itself and may even represent a successful peel. [4] In this case, it well corroborates with absence of ILM/ILM re proliferation noted during the second surgery.

The OCT images after the second surgery also show characteristic temporal thinning seen frequently in long-term after ILM peeling. [4] Retinal thinning represents surgical trauma endured by the macula. Reasons for this asymmetric macular morphology however are not very clear and have been attributed to the resistant nature of nasal macula due to tight packing of nerve fibers. In fact decreased temporal macular nerve fiber layer thickness has been well documented after ILM peeling and thus may be cause of macular thinning. [5] Furthermore foveal displacement toward the optic disc might be responsible for the stretching and thinning of the retinal parenchyma in the temporal subfield. [5] Although ILM peel definitely causes architectural changes, until now no detrimental effect on quantitative visual acuity has been proven. [4]

Finally, as per authors C3F8 gas has been used during the repeat surgery. However fundus picture two weeks after the repeat procedure does not show any gas bubble. Could it be related to wound leak? A similar leak during the first surgery could have been the cause of failure of primary surgery.

 
  References Top

1.
Rishi P, Reddy S, Rishi E. Repeat gas insufflation for successful closure of idiopathic macular hole following failed primary surgery. Indian J Ophthalmol 2014;62:363-5.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
2.
Tadayoni R, Paques M, Massin P, Mouki-Benani S, Mikol J, Gaudric A. Dissociated optic nerve fiber layer appearance of the fundus after idiopathic epiretinal membrane removal. Ophthalmology 2001;108:2279-83.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Spaide RF. "Dissociated optic nerve fiber layer appearance" after internal limiting membrane removal is inner retinal dimpling. Retina 2012;32:1719-26.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Pichi F, Lembo A, Morara M, Veronese C, Alkabes M, Nucci P, et al. Early and late inner retinal changes after inner limiting membrane peeling. Int Ophthalmol 2014;34:437-46.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Balducci N, Morara M, Veronese C, Torrazza C, Pichi F, Ciardella AP. Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness modification after internal limiting membrane peeling. Retina 2014;34:655-63.  Back to cited text no. 5
    




 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed475    
    Printed5    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded105    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal