Glyxambi
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 3579
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

   Table of Contents      
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Year : 2015  |  Volume : 63  |  Issue : 5  |  Page : 466-467

Re: Scleral fixation of one piece intraocular lens by injector implantation


Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Göz Hastalıkları Anabilim Dalı, Samsun, Turkey

Date of Web Publication2-Jul-2015

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Ertugrul Can
Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Göz Hastalıkları Anabilim Dalı, Samsun
Turkey
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0301-4738.159905

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Can E. Re: Scleral fixation of one piece intraocular lens by injector implantation. Indian J Ophthalmol 2015;63:466-7

How to cite this URL:
Can E. Re: Scleral fixation of one piece intraocular lens by injector implantation. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2015 [cited 2019 Dec 10];63:466-7. Available from: http://www.ijo.in/text.asp?2015/63/5/466/159905

Dear Editor,

We agree with the concern that we did not mention the increasingly popular techniques of secondary intraocular lens ( IOL) implantation in aphakia management, namely intrascleral sutureless haptic fixation and iris-claw lenses and it would be better to concern about those techniques in the article. However, we believe that intrascleral sutureless haptic fixation techniques are so cumbersome that no one, but a veteran ophthalmic surgeon can succeed it and they are not as popular as the reviewer suppose. This can be more understood after trying a few attempts. Today, scleral fixation of a foldable IOL seems to be the most popular method for aphakia in the world.

In our case series, we used one-piece IOLs, and it is true that transscleral IOL fixation has some risks and complications such as IOL decentration, tilt, suture breakage, vitreous hemorrhage, and endophthalmitis. Except IOL decentration and tilt, our procedure has the same risk factors that can be seen in all sutured sclera fixated IOL surgeries, and these are the limitation of our procedure. It would be better to prefer a three-piece hydrophobic IOL to decrease the likelihood of such complications.

In a scleral-fixated IOL, the haptics are stacked in the ciliary sulcus, and the IOL is not suspended. Hence, we do not agree with the concern that there is more pseudophacodonesis, and this may lead to posterior segment complications in the long-term.

Late suture breakage and other complications of scleral fixated posterior chamber IOLs are possible to occur, but they were reported in the literature as case reports. Their very low ratio is not an obstacle to do this method. The likelihood of having a complication in a normal phacoemulsification surgery is much more and this situation is not an obstacle to perform phacoemulsification surgery.

We left suture knots were long, extended and buried under the conjunctiva in order to prevent suture exposure and external suture erosion. We did not leave the sutures short in length. It is the choice of the surgeon to make a scleral flap, scleral pocket or patch graft to cover the external suture. [1]

 
  References Top

1.
Can E, Basaran R, Gul A, Birinci H. Scleral fixation of one piece intraocular lens by injector implantation. Indian J Ophthalmol 2014;62:857-60.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  




 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed519    
    Printed3    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded123    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal