Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 4300
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

   Table of Contents      
Year : 2015  |  Volume : 63  |  Issue : 6  |  Page : 558-559

The muscle transplantation and loop myopexy in so-called heavy eye syndrome

Department of Pediatric Ophthamology, Pediatric Ophthalmology and Squint Clinic, Dr. Thakorbhai V Patel Eye Institute, Vaduwala Eye Hospital, Salatwada, Vadodara, Gujarat, India

Date of Web Publication11-Aug-2015

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Jitendra Jethani
Department of Pediatric Ophthamology, Pediatric Ophthalmology and Squint Clinic, Dr. Thakorbhai V Patel Eye Institute, Vaduwala Eye Hospital, Haribhakti Complex, Salatwada, Vadodara - 390 001, Gujarat
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/0301-4738.162648

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Jethani J. The muscle transplantation and loop myopexy in so-called heavy eye syndrome. Indian J Ophthalmol 2015;63:558-9

How to cite this URL:
Jethani J. The muscle transplantation and loop myopexy in so-called heavy eye syndrome. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2015 [cited 2020 Jun 3];63:558-9. Available from: http://www.ijo.in/text.asp?2015/63/6/558/162648

Dear Sir,

We thank Bhambwani et al. for their interest in our case report on loop myopexy with muscle transplantation in a patient of the heavy eye syndrome with large esotropia and hyportopia. [1]

The medial rectus was recessed because the forced duction test (FDT) was strongly positive as mentioned. The inferior rectus (IR) muscle showed a mildly positive FDT (as written in the case report), [1] which clearly suggests that the tightness was minimal and was appreciated only minimally in extreme elevation. We do not believe that such minimal tightness of IR can cause such a large deviation and hence was not recessed. Our case report clearly mentions about the mildly positive FDT for elevation. [1]

The effectiveness of transplanted muscle in terms of correction of deviation is a proved one and the fact that the tissue remains viable but would lose its contractile properties is also a known fact. [2] This, however, cannot be compared with a large conventional large recession as suggested by the authors, which would place the new insertion posterior to the functional equator. The ocular motility in a muscle transplant postsurgery remains excellent. [2] The unconventionally large recession invariably ends up in having motility loss. We present pre- and post-operative pictures of another patient who underwent muscle transplant for a large angle esotropia. The postoperative pictures clearly show minimal adduction loss even after muscle transplantation [Figure 1]a-c.
Figure 1: The photographs show the preoperative (a), the immediate postoperative (b) and the later postoperative motility of the operated eye. Note that the motility (c) is very good in the left eye post (muscle transplantation) surgery

Click here to view

A hemi hang back recession as the authors have suggested [1] will would have two major problems, first the muscle may creep forward with such a large recession on hang back and the second obvious problem that it would attach to a point which would be posterior to the arc of contact and hence the restriction of ocular motility in the ipsilateral direction would make it a big incomitant procedure [Figure 2]a-c. Therefore, the transplantation could have been avoid only by putting a segment of silicone band as used in expander surgeries in brown's syndrome [3],[4] [Figure 2]a. However, the major problem with such a use was that the expander would have to be sutured to the globe for insertion, and second it may get extruded [4] with disastrous results.
Figure 2: Schematic diagrams representing the muscle transplantation (a), the hang back recession (b) and the conventional recession or the long-term result of hang back recession (c). It is important to understand here that the segment used (a) could be the muscle or the silicone band. This serves two purposes, first it does not let the muscle creep forward and second the actual insertion remains anterior to the equator and hence the ocular motility is better

Click here to view

At present, we have a series of 35 patients who underwent muscle transplantation (unpublished data, part of it was presented at AIOC 2014) and a series of 14 patients who has esotropia and underwent muscle transplantation. Most of them have a good ocular motility postoperatively [Figure 3]a-c.
Figure 3: The photographs show another large angle esotropia. The preoperative (a), the immediate postoperative (b) and the late postoperative motility of the operated right eye. Note that the motility (c) in the right eye after the muscle transplantation surgery

Click here to view

The plan of doing the magnetic resonance and IR recession first and then a lateral rectus resection with loop myopexy would end up having surgery almost on all four muscles with three recti cut and the fourth one having a loop which may restrict its blood supply. This would actually increase the risk of anterior segment ischemia. Moreover, with IR not being tight, we fail to see the logic of operating on the IR in the presence of a minimally positive FDT. We do agree that a high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging would have been preferable than a computed tomography scan.

  References Top

Jethani J, Amin S. Loop myopexy with true muscle transplantation for very large angle heavy eye syndrome patient. Indian J Ophthalmol 2015;63:71-2.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
Hiatt RL. Extraocular muscle transplantation. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1973;71:426-58.  Back to cited text no. 2
Wright KW. Results of the superior oblique tendon elongation procedure for severe Brown′s syndrome. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 2000;98:41-8.  Back to cited text no. 3
Wright KW. Superior oblique silicone expander for Brown syndrome and superior oblique overaction. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 1991;28:101-7.  Back to cited text no. 4


  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]


    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

  In this article
Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded156    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal