• Users Online: 43113
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

   Table of Contents      
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 64  |  Issue : 11  |  Page : 860-861

Adaptive optics study of photoreceptors layer damage from presumed sun exposure: A case report


San Paolo Ophthalmic Center, San Antonio Hospital, Padova, Italy

Date of Web Publication13-Dec-2016

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Anton Giulio Catania
San Paolo Ophthalmic Center, San Antonio Hospital, Via Facciolati 71, Padova 35126
Italy
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0301-4738.195619

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Lo Giudice G, Catania AG, Galan A. Adaptive optics study of photoreceptors layer damage from presumed sun exposure: A case report. Indian J Ophthalmol 2016;64:860-1

How to cite this URL:
Lo Giudice G, Catania AG, Galan A. Adaptive optics study of photoreceptors layer damage from presumed sun exposure: A case report. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2016 [cited 2024 Mar 28];64:860-1. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/ijo/pages/default.aspx/text.asp?2016/64/11/860/195619

Sir,

In the present study, we described a case of solar retinopathy studied by means of adaptive optics (AO). Solar retinopathy consists in a photooxidative retinal injury following a prolonged exposition to high-energy light. Histopathological studies have confirmed that both the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) layer and the outer segments of the photoreceptors layers are susceptible to be damaged. [1] Several diagnostic tools are used to evaluate solar retinopathy, including fundus autofluorescence (FAF), fluorescein angiography, multifocal electroretinography, and optical coherence tomography (OCT). [2],[3] AO fundus imaging is a reliable technique for assessing and quantifying the changes in the photoreceptors layer. AO works by measuring and correcting ocular aberrations in real time, achieving a lateral resolution of 2 μm. [4]

We studied a case of a 25-year-old woman complaining decreased visual acuity (20/200 OU), central scotoma, chromotopsia, and photophobia after a mountain walk over the snow in a sunny day and without sunglasses protection. Other causes of macular phototoxicity, including welding arc, exposure to microscope light, laser pointer were excluded from this study. Although she denied it, we cannot exclude she had direct sun gazing. Ophthalmoscopic examination, fundus photography, FAF, spectral domain OCT (SD-OCT), and AO examination were performed to study in vivo retinal damage at cellular level.

All clinical features were suggestive for solar retinopathy. Ophthalmoscopic examination revealed foveal small yellowish-white spot with surrounding gray, granular pigmentation [Figure 1]a. SD-OCT showed full-thickness rod-shaped foveal hyper-reflectivity extended from the outer segments of the photoreceptors and RPE to the inner layer of the retina, and a slight interruption of the external limiting membrane and the ellipsoid zones with disorganized material [Figure 1]b. AO examination was obtained using the Rtx1 AO retinal flood-illumination camera (Rtx1, Imagine Eyes, Orsay, France). Each image was obtained by an average of forty frames of a 4° × 4° retinal area. Cone cells density was then calculated using proprietary software. AO imaging revealed disruption of the cone mosaicism, and cone density extended reduction beyond the limit of the lesion visualized by both FAF and SD-OCT [[Figure 1]c and Supplementary Figure 1a [Additional file 1], Figure 2a [Additional file 2]].
Figure 1: Multimodal imaging of a 25-year-old woman with acute solar retinopathy in the left eye. (a) Fundus photography showed a foveal yellowish-white spot with surrounding gray, granular pigmentation. (b) Spectral domain optical coherence tomography detected increased foveal rod-shaped full-thickness hyperreflectivity that extended from the outer segments of the photoreceptors and the retinal pigment epithelium to the inner layer of the retina. (c) Adaptive optics cone density map is based on a color scale expressed in thousands of cones/mm² and shows heterogeneous disruption of the cone photoreceptor mosaic with cone density reduction

Click here to view


A progressive resolution of clinical and anatomical signs was shown on ophthalmoscopy, SD-OCT, and FAF with a near-complete restoration of the ellipsoidal and interdigitation zones during follow-up [[Figure 2]a, b and Supplementary Figure 1b]. Microperimetry was also performed after 24 months follow-up, showing normal retinal sensitivity [Supplementary Figure 3] [Additional file 3]. Visual acuity improved to 20/20 OU, although central scotoma persisted in both eyes. AO revealed a progressive but incomplete improvement in cone mosaic distribution and density during follow-up [[Figure 2]c and Supplementary Figure 2b].
Figure 2: Multimodal imaging 24 months later. (a) The solar retinopathy lesion was barely detectable in the fundus photography image in the left eye. (b) Spectral domain optical coherence tomography detected a complete restoration of the ellipsoid and interdigitation zones. (c) Adaptive optics revealed incomplete recovery of the cone mosaic, with persistent cone photoreceptor loss at the level of the solar retinopathy lesion

Click here to view


Several reports describe a multimodal approach to visualize RPE and photoreceptors layers. [2],[3] AO imaging was more sensitive than combined FAF and SD-OCT to detect and follow photoreceptors damage on solar retinopathy. Cone loss was consistent with continued central scotoma as reported by our patient. The question is whether the lack of cone visualization showed in AO images was really related to a cone loss or rather to an optical shadowing. A previous study demonstrates disappearance of the normal cone mosaic on AO images of the macular area co-localized with a disruption of the interdigitation zone on OCT in different pathologies. Conversely, a normalization of the normal cone mosaic was related to concomitant restoration of the interdigitation zone on OCT. [5]

We suppose that a real cone damage event occurred in our patient, and succeeding photoreceptor recovery demonstrates neuronal reconstitution, reorganization, and plasticity in vivo at cellular level. AO are an excellent tool for documenting photoreceptor damage and recovery in solar retinopathy, showing higher sensitivity in photoreceptor damage detection than both SD-OCT and FAF.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
  References Top

1.
Hope-Ross MW, Mahon GJ, Gardiner TA, Archer DB. Ultrastructural findings in solar retinopathy. Eye (Lond) 1993;7(Pt 1):29-33.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Stangos AN, Petropoulos IK, Pournaras JA, Zaninetti M, Borruat FX, Pournaras CJ. Optical coherence tomography and multifocal electroretinogram findings in chronic solar retinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol 2007;144:131-4.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Kung YH, Wu TT, Sheu SJ. Subtle solar retinopathy detected by Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography. J Chin Med Assoc 2010;73:396-8.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Felberer F, Kroisamer JS, Baumann B, Zotter S, Schmidt-Erfurth U, Hitzenberger CK, et al. Adaptive optics SLO/OCT for 3D imaging of human photoreceptors in vivo. Biomed Opt Express 2014;5:439-56.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Jacob J, Paques M, Krivosic V, Dupas B, Couturier A, Kulcsar C, et al. Meaning of visualizing retinal cone mosaic on adaptive optics images. Am J Ophthalmol 2015;159:118-23.e1.  Back to cited text no. 5
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]


This article has been cited by
1 Injury of photoreceptors and retinal pigment epithelium in macular area of a preterm infant
Xiantao Sun, Ting Liu, Shuang Sun, Yuebing Lu, Fei Wang, Yuanchun Xie, Guanfeng Li, Hui Wang, Yu Jiang, Yunyun Huang
Medicine. 2020; 99(29): e21096
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
References
Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1981    
    Printed34    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded171    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal