Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 3865
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

   Table of Contents      
BRIEF COMMUNICATION
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 64  |  Issue : 8  |  Page : 606-608

Choroidal neovascular membrane in a treated choroidal hemangioma


Department of Vitro-Retina, Sankara Nethralaya, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

Date of Submission06-Oct-2015
Date of Acceptance11-Jul-2016
Date of Web Publication30-Sep-2016

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Vikas Khetan
Department of Vitro-Retina, Sankara Nethralaya, Chennai, Tamil Nadu
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0301-4738.191512

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Association of choroidal neovascular (CNV) membrane with circumscribed choroidal hemangioma is rare, and the CNV development after photodynamic therapy (PDT) is also rare. Etiopathogenesis of these associations is poorly understood. We noted the development of CNV over choroidal hemangioma after PDT therapy in a young female patient in our hospital. Temporal association of CNV development after PDT treatment points toward the possible side effects of PDT. Repeat injections of antivascular endothelial growth factor (ranibizumab) regressed the CNV resulting in a favorable visual outcome.

Keywords: Antivascular endothelial growth factor therapy, choroidal neovascular membrane, circumscribed choroidal hemangioma, photodynamic therapy


How to cite this article:
Nagesha CK, Walinjkar JA, Khetan V. Choroidal neovascular membrane in a treated choroidal hemangioma. Indian J Ophthalmol 2016;64:606-8

How to cite this URL:
Nagesha CK, Walinjkar JA, Khetan V. Choroidal neovascular membrane in a treated choroidal hemangioma. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2016 [cited 2020 Jun 4];64:606-8. Available from: http://www.ijo.in/text.asp?2016/64/8/606/191512

Choroidal neovascularization (CNV) rarely occurs in association with circumscribed choroidal hemangioma (CCH) or after its treatment. Shields et al. [1] in their series of 200 patients of CCH observed that three CCH patients had concomitant CNV. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is considered the standard and the safest modality to treat choroidal hemangioma at the cost of insignificant side effects, among which the development or progression of CNV post-PDT has been rarely reported. [2] The pathogenesis of such rare associations is poorly understood. Relationship of CNV with either choroidal hemangioma or post-PDT therapy effect focuses our attention to possible triggering factors and also strategies for the successful management of these unusual presentations. We observed CNV in a young patient with CCH, who underwent treatment with PDT which was later managed with antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy to regain the lost vision.


  Case Report Top


A 12-year-old female presented with the complaints of decreased vision in the right eye of recent onset. Clinical examination showed classical CHH superotemporal to fovea with subfoveal fluid which was the cause for drop in vision to 20/80. The lesion was confirmed by fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA), ultrasound, and optical coherence tomography (OCT). OCT showed subretinal fluid (SRF) under fovea [composite [Figure 1]]. Because of proximity to macula and symptomatic presentation, PDT was done using a 6 mg/m 2 dose of verteporfin and a 689 nm laser (Visulas 690S, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc. Germany) with 25 J/cm 2 of laser light (half-fluence) delivered over a duration of 83 s on γ-linolenic acid of 2.5 mm as determined by FFA.
Figure 1: Composite photographs showing (a) circumscribed choroidal hemangioma with overlying subretinal fluid; (b) fundus fluorescein angiography showing patchy staining of superotemporal region corresponding to circumscribed choroidal hemangioma; (c) spectral domain-optical coherence tomography image scan passing through macula showing elevated retinal pigment epithelium with subretinal fluid

Click here to view


Three months post-PDT, vision improved to 6/5 with a complete resolution of SRF and regressed CCH. OCT showed normal foveal dip with increased surface reflectivity of choriocapillary layer superotemporal to foveal center [composite [Figure 1]]. Eight months later, the patient presented with recurrence of SRF; OCT confirmed the same with grossly normal-looking underlying retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) and choriocapillary layers. The patient underwent the 2 nd PDT with similar parameters (half-fluence), almost on the same area of the previous target.

Two months follow-up showed improvement in vision to 6/5. After 1 month follow-up, the patient presented with drop in vision and was noted to have active choroidal neovascular membrane (CNVM), which was confirmed on FFA and OCT [Figure 2]. The patient was treated with two intravitreal ranibizumab injections over 2 months. The CNV regressed completely with the resolution of intraretinal and SRF, which was later confirmed on OCT. The patient was under follow-up for 18 months and has had no reactivation of either CNV or CCH till the time of this write-up.
Figure 2: Composite fundus picture showing the course of circumscribed choroidal hemangioma and choroidal neovascular membrane. (a) Linear ridge over circumscribed choroidal hemangioma after the 1st photodynamic therapy and (d) corresponding optical coherence tomography image; (b) progression of choroidal neovascularization and (c) corresponding active leakage site on fundus fluorescein angiography (e) optical coherence tomography showing subretinal pigment epithelium location of choroidal neovascular membrane; (f and g) fundus picture of resolved choroidal neovascular membrane with corresponding optical coherence tomography image

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


Retinal and disc neovascularization has been described in the eyes with retinal or choroidal tumors without obvious triggering factors such as retinal artery or vein occlusion, [3] capillary dropout, or inflammation. Tumor-related CNV is rarely reported, especially with CCH. Among 200 cases of CCH studied by Shields et al., [1] three cases had associated CNV and only one needed active intervention.

Hua et al. [2] had reported a case of a rare association of CCH with CNV in a HIV patient. The author postulated multiple causes for pathogenic association including possible complication of potent antiretroviral therapy associated with immune recovery uveitis or active role of exogenous HIV-1 transactivator protein that could alter the tight junction integrity and function of RPE.

Many reasons have been attributed to the development of CNV in CCH. Vascular leakage of CCH facilitates angiogenesis because of the leakage of plasma proteins and fibrins creating gel-like environment which is conductive to endothelial cell growth and infiltration. [4] CCH stimulates release of angiogenic factors due to subtle inflammation and chronic ischemia. [5]

Querques et al. [5] noted an active CNV with an underlying inactive CCH in a 66 yr old female with no features of age-related macular degeneration. The author successfully treated the CNVM with nine consecutive ranibizumab injections rather than PDT. He believed that chronic inflammation and ischemia secondary to CCH resulted in CNV. The present case had no CNV before the initiation of PDT, became active after the 2 nd PDT session, speculating the possible role of PDT in triggering the development and progression of CNV rather than de novo development of CNV over CCH.

PDT is considered the most effective treatment modality for CH over macular area. Subtle complications including RPE alterations and loss of photoreceptors have been described after PDT therapy. Anecdotal evidences documented the development of retinal neovascularization, [3] RPE hyperplasia, [6] and polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy [7] after PDT. Many have theorized that multiple sessions of PDT may cause laser-induced necrosis of the tumor and release of VEGF.

PDT is known to increase growth factors by the destruction of RPE. RPE releases VEGF under hypoxic condition, and on the other hand, RPE may be responsible for preventing CNV induction by secreting inhibitory factors such as transforming growth factor-B and promoting maturation of neovascularization. Okay et al. in their histopathological analysis of 42 surgically excised CNV specimens with or without presurgery PDT made some relevant observations. The author analyzed changes in intricate balance between VEGF and PDGF and noted that a significant increase in RPE produced VEGF, but there was a decrease in pigment epithelial-derived growth factor (PEDF) (antiangiogenic factor) from RPE, endothelial cells, and stromal cells. The author concluded that PDT causes a trauma followed by enhanced VEGF and decreased PEDF expression leading to angiogenesis. [8]

Clinically, the role of PDT in CNV pathogenesis, however, is poorly supported. Barbazetto et al. [6] during their preliminary studies on the efficacy of PDT in choroidal hemangioma (CH) applied a radiant exposure of 100 J/cm 2 for 168 s at a dose of 60 mg/m 2 and at more frequent multiple sessions. He observed choroidal nonperfusion with secondary RPE atrophy, but no neovascular growth was noted. Even full-fluence PDT for CNV lesions in paediatric and young adult patients had only RPE alterations, which had neither effect on vision nor secondary sight-threatening complications. [9]

Several clinical series of patients with CCH treated by PDT with different protocols (using 50-100 J/cm 2 ) have been described, with authors reporting an overall favorable outcome, and also previous authors have noted nonsignificant RPE changes with a radiant exposure dose of 50 J/cm 2 . [10] In view of young age and location of hemangioma adjacent to macular area, it was decided to have half-fluence therapy to prevent RPE atrophy, but retaining its efficacy.

Optimal management of tumor-related CNV is at present unknown. On the basis of extensive evidences of the efficacy of anti-VEGF in varied pathogenic CNV, especially in pediatric population, [2],[5],[11] our patient was successfully treated with intravitreal ranibizumab but with just two injections compared to nine injections in a previous report. [5] The recurrence rate after anti-VEGF in these situations is unknown, but fortunately in the present case, the lesion became quiescent after two injections with no recurrence during 18-month of follow-up.


  Conclusion Top


We report a case of CCH that developed CNV after the 2 nd PDT. Possible pathology triggering the CNV formation needs better understanding. Anti-VEGF therapy completely regressed the lesion, regaining the lost vision.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
  References Top

1.
Shields CL, Honavar SG, Shields JA, Cater J, Demirci H. Circumscribed choroidal hemangioma: Clinical manifestations and factors predictive of visual outcome in 200 consecutive cases. Ophthalmology 2001;108:2237-48.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]    
2.
Hua R, Zhao N, Hu Y, Zhang CM, Chen L. Circumscribed choroidal hemangioma associated with choroidal neovascularization in a HIV-infected case: Photodynamic therapy and intravitreous ranibizumab. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther 2014;11:441-3.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]    
3.
Leys AM, Silva R, Inhoffen W, Tatar O. Neovascular growth following photodynamic therapy for choroidal hemangioma and neovascular regression after intravitreous injection of triamcinolone. Retina 2006;26:693-7.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]    
4.
Weis SM, Cheresh DA. Pathophysiological consequences of VEGF-induced vascular permeability. Nature 2005;437:497-504.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]    
5.
Querques G, Forte R, Querques L, Souied EH. Intravitreal ranibizumab for choroidal neovascularization associated with circumscribed choroidal haemangioma. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2011;39:916-8.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]    
6.
Barbazetto I, Schmidt-Erfurth U. Photodynamic therapy of choroidal hemangioma: Two case reports. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2000;238:214-21.  Back to cited text no. 6
[PUBMED]    
7.
Tuncer S, Demirci H, Shields CL, Shields JA. Polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy following photodynamic therapy for choroidal hemangioma. Eur J Ophthalmol 2009;19:159-62.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]    
8.
Obana A. Photodynamic therapy for experimental choroidal neovascularization using ATX-S10(Na). In: Gragoudas ES, Miller JW, Zografos L, editors. Photodynamic Therapy of Ocular Diseases. 1 st ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2004. p. 81.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Lipski A, Bornfeld N, Jurklies B. Photodynamic therapy with verteporfin in paediatric and young adult patients: Long-term treatment results of choroidal neovascularisations. Br J Ophthalmol 2008;92:655-60.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Boixadera A, García-Arumí J, Martínez-Castillo V, Encinas JL, Elizalde J, Blanco-Mateos G, et al. Prospective clinical trial evaluating the efficacy of photodynamic therapy for symptomatic circumscribed choroidal hemangioma. Ophthalmology 2009;116:100-5.e1.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Kozak I, Mansour A, Diaz RI, Calzada JI, Pichi F, Cruz-Villegas V, et al. Outcomes of treatment of pediatric choroidal neovascularization with intravitreal antiangiogenic agents: The results of the KKESH International Collaborative Retina Study Group. Retina 2014;34:2044-52.  Back to cited text no. 11
[PUBMED]    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Abstract
Case Report
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed917    
    Printed6    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded144    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal