Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 4993
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

   Table of Contents      
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 65  |  Issue : 11  |  Page : 1071-1072

Pediatric ophthalmology, neuro-ophthalmology, uvea, and oculoplasty: Survival is the only option

Editor, Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, Editorial Office: Centre for Sight, Road No 2, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad - 500 034, Telangana, India

Date of Web Publication13-Nov-2017

Correspondence Address:
Santosh G Honavar
Editor, Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, Editorial Office: Centre for Sight, Road No 2, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad - 500 034, Telangana
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1092_17

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Honavar SG. Pediatric ophthalmology, neuro-ophthalmology, uvea, and oculoplasty: Survival is the only option. Indian J Ophthalmol 2017;65:1071-2

How to cite this URL:
Honavar SG. Pediatric ophthalmology, neuro-ophthalmology, uvea, and oculoplasty: Survival is the only option. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2017 [cited 2020 May 30];65:1071-2. Available from: http://www.ijo.in/text.asp?2017/65/11/1071/218036

Evolution is the unfading law of nature. Ophthalmology has emerged as a rapidly evolving specialty, after a very humble beginning before its separation from otorhinolaryngology in the 20th century.[1] The progress in the last few decades have been astonishing – introduction of microsurgical techniques, technological infusion in diagnostics and therapeutics, and evolution of subspecialties in ophthalmology and their restless growth have all resulted in a revolution in evolution. Coming of age of cataract surgery, paradigm changes in laser refractive surgery and pharmacological treatment of retinal diseases have all fueled the recent growth spurt. As part of its growth process, ophthalmology has got itself neatly organized into several distinct subspecialties, each of which now is on its own trajectory of further evolution. Choosing and pursuing a subspecialty is now a goal for most residents not only for better professional satisfaction but also to generate a higher income.

What appeals a young mind to a particular subspecialty? In a not so startling revelation, the answer to this question is the anticipated income, which seems the most essential facet to generate interest in a specific medical field.[2],[3],[4] Other factors influencing the choice-making process are the interest that the subject evokes in the individual, lifestyle, gender, personality traits, and family influence.[2],[3],[4],[5],[6] Although most studies that have reported the decisive factors in making a career choice in medicine are limited to selection of a specialty subject in postgraduation, these very aspects reflect on further refinement of career choices as well.

Subspecialty choice is also evidently influenced by the curriculum the residency programs offer. Due to the sparsity of neuro-ophthalmologists, pediatric ophthalmologists, uvea specialists, and oculoplastic surgeons in residency training institutions, these subjects remain rather distant to the residents. With minimal exposure and lack of practical knowledge, very little interest is generated for the residents to pursue these rather underexposed subspecialties as their mainstream career path.

Cataract, cornea, refractive surgery, glaucoma, and vitreoretinal surgery continue to remain the obvious trendsetters in ophthalmology. This trend is partly palpable from the higher number of member societies that these subspecialties enjoy. The Cornea Society of India, Indian Society of Cornea and Keratorefractive Surgeons, Intraocular Implant and Refractive Society of India, Glaucoma Society of India, and Vitreoretinal Society witness greater membership applicants with each passing year, as opposed to Oculoplasty Association of India (OPAI), Uvea Society of India (USI), or Strabismus and Paediatric Ophthalmological Society of India (SPOSI). Despite a timely shrill pitch for neuro-ophthalmology,[7] the establishment of the formal Indian Neuro-ophthalmology Society (INOS) is very nascent.

Dr Frohman recognized the problem of the declining number of neuro-ophthalmologists and attributed it to the deteriorating interest among the trainees to pursue neuro-ophthalmology as a career choice.[4] The important reasons for this were stated to be lack of surgeries, difficulty of the subject, and salary prospects.[4] Uvea, on the other hand, is associated with a multitude of systemic diseases which not many ophthalmologists are keen to deal with. The lack of intraocular procedures in oculoplasty and esthetics dissuades the cataract-trained residents to waver from their streamlined surgical skills.[8]

A similar scenario is evident in pediatric ophthalmology and strabismus (POS) practice. The time and patience to deal with children (and parents) and the need for general anesthesia for most surgical procedures pushes the residents toward better time-effective subspecialties. In the current issue of Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, Parija and Mahajan discuss the existing trend of POS subspecialty in India, and the various attributes that influence the residents to pursue POS as a career choice, and Kekunnaya does a deep analysis of this concern in his invited editorial.[9],[10]

Evolution results in progress but is never uniform. Carl Sagan strikingly states that “Extinction is the rule. Survival is the exception.” The threat of extinction of fringe subspecialties is quite real, and if no heed is paid at this very moment, they may soon dwindle to insignificance. Inattention to this sounding alarm may diminish the wide spectrum of ophthalmology in the years to come. This issue must be attended to with diligence, and the leaders in these subspecialties must swing into action to converge ideas and bring about sharp vicissitude in the career choices made by the residents. It is up to the illustrious flag bearers in their respective fields to capture the attention of the trainees and expose them to the excitement that each specialty offers, promote intellectual curiosity, and mold the young impressionable minds to take up these subspecialties as their career choice, and help sustain the uniqueness of each subject. Choosing these subspecialties will not preclude a clinician from performing cataract surgeries to fill the available time and surgical slots. Comprehensive ophthalmologists may also be encouraged to have a special focus of interest in one of these subspecialties with targeted training to bridge the skill set. Medical colleges and institutions offering residency training must be mandated to have their faculty trained in each subspecialty and develop specialized clinical units. Until that becomes a reality, externship rotation may be an option to help expose the residents to the best that these subspecialties offer.

The leadership of the All India Ophthalmological Society (AIOS) may assume a proactive role here and help make these specialties visible and interesting (by providing adequate representation in prime time and location, and curating lectures by international authorities and opinion leaders) in their annual conference, and formulate appropriate visionary policies to support and help these specialties to rise and thrive, and not simply leave it to SPOSI, OPAI, USI, or INOS. Let's hope that all this is initiated under the able leadership of the current AIOS president, who is a distinguished pediatric ophthalmologist himself. Let the commercially driven evolution of ophthalmology not marginalize and reduce some of its very rich, essential, and interesting aspects into mere vestigial appendages.

  References Top

Truhlsen SM. Whatever happened to the EENT specialists? Surv Ophthalmol 2013;58:92-4.  Back to cited text no. 1
Rosenblatt RA, Andrilla CH. The impact of U.S. Medical students' debt on their choice of primary care careers: An analysis of data from the 2002 medical school graduation questionnaire. Acad Med 2005;80:815-9.  Back to cited text no. 2
Kwon OY, Park SY. Specialty choice preference of medical students according to personality traits by Five-Factor Model. Korean J Med Educ 2016;28:95-102.  Back to cited text no. 3
Frohman LP. How can we assure that neuro-ophthalmology will survive? Ophthalmology 2005;112:741-3.  Back to cited text no. 4
Borges NJ, Stratton TD, Wagner PJ, Elam CL. Emotional intelligence and medical specialty choice: Findings from three empirical studies. Med Educ 2009;43:565-72.  Back to cited text no. 5
Lambert EM, Holmboe ES. The relationship between specialty choice and gender of U.S. Medical students, 1990-2003. Acad Med 2005;80:797-802.  Back to cited text no. 6
Nair AG, Gandhi RA. Neuro-ophthalmology in India: The way forward. Indian J Ophthalmol 2014;62:980-1.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
Honavar SG. Let's face it: The potential of periocular aesthetics. Indian J Ophthalmol 2017;65:543-4.  Back to cited text no. 8
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
Parija S, Mahajan P. Is pediatric ophthalmology a popular subspecialty in India: Present scenario and future remedies. Indian J Ophthalmol 2017;65:1186-90.  Back to cited text no. 9
Kekunnaya R. Pediatric ophthalmology and strabismus in India: Wake-up call and the way forward!. Indian J Ophthalmol 2017;65:1077-8.  Back to cited text no. 10
  [Full text]  


    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

  In this article

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded407    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal