Glyxambi
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 7910
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

   Table of Contents      
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 65  |  Issue : 11  |  Page : 1156-1160

Frequency of primary mutations of Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy patients in North Indian population


1 Department of Paediatrics, Division of Genetics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
2 Dr Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, All Indian Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

Date of Submission25-May-2017
Date of Acceptance03-Jul-2017
Date of Web Publication13-Nov-2017

Correspondence Address:
Madhumita Roy Chowdhury
Department of Paediatrics, Division of Genetics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_380_17

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Purpose: Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON) is an inherited optic neuropathy characterized by subacute painless vision loss. The majority of LHON is caused due to one of the three primary mutations in the mitochondrial DNA (m.G3460A, m.G11778A, and m.T14484C). The frequency of these mutations differs in different populations. The purpose of this study is to observe the frequency of three common primary mutations in the North Indian population. Methods: Forty LHON patients within the age group of 10–50 years underwent molecular testing for primary mutations. For two patients, testing for mother and other siblings was also carried out, using bidirectional sequencing. Results: A total of 11 out of 40 (27.5%) patients were found to be carrying m.G11778A mutation. Siblings of two probands were also positive for the same mutation. In one family, two primary mutations (m.G11778A and m.T14484C) were found in the proband and in the mother as well. Conclusion: In this study, 27.5% mutation was detected in North Indian LHON families. These results suggest that m.G11778A mutation is more frequent in this population. The results of the present study are compatible with studies of an Asian population and Northern European population.

Keywords: Homoplasmy, Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy, mitochondrial DNA, optic atrophy, primary mutation


How to cite this article:
Mishra A, Devi S, Saxena R, Gupta N, Kabra M, Chowdhury MR. Frequency of primary mutations of Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy patients in North Indian population. Indian J Ophthalmol 2017;65:1156-60

How to cite this URL:
Mishra A, Devi S, Saxena R, Gupta N, Kabra M, Chowdhury MR. Frequency of primary mutations of Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy patients in North Indian population. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2017 [cited 2019 Oct 22];65:1156-60. Available from: http://www.ijo.in/text.asp?2017/65/11/1156/218047

Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON; OMIM 535000) is a subgroup of optic neuropathy, characterized by acute or subacute vision loss. LHON may be unilateral and might involve the fellow eye sequentially with a median inter-eye delay of around 8 weeks.[1]

LHON can occur at any age but usually manifests in the second or third decade of life with mean age of onset being 20–24 years.[2] It is seen that in almost all LHON patients (>95% of European population), one of three common mutations (m.G3460A, m.G11778A, and m.T14484C) present in the mitochondrial complex 1: NADH dehydrogenase (ubiquinone) subunits 1, 4, and 6 (ND1, ND4 and ND6), respectively, is responsible for the disease, but the frequency of these individual mutations varies within populations. Among the three primary mutations, m.G11778A is the predominant mutation seen in most East Asian[3] and European population.[4] Another recent study from the southern part of India showed a reduced frequency of LHON primary mutations.[5]

The objective of the present study is to observe the frequency of the three common primary mutations for LHON in the North Indian population.


  Methods Top


Patient diagnosis

This was a prospective observational study of forty LHON patients who presented to the Neuro-Ophthalmology Clinic of our center from January 2014 to January 2016. A detailed ophthalmological examination was done in all patients, including visual acuity testing using Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study chart, color vision using Ishihara's pseudoisochromatic plates, contrast sensitivity with Pelli-Robson chart, visual field testing using Goldmann/automated perimetry, evaluation of pupillary reactions, fundus examination and visually evoked response (Nicolet Ganzfeld stimulator, Nicolet Inc., Madison, WI, USA), retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFL), and retinal ganglion cell layer thickness measured by optical coherence tomography (4.0.2 Carl Zeiss). Patients were clinically diagnosed to have LHON if there was subacute visual loss, with sequential or simultaneous involvement of both eyes, with fundus features such as vascular tortuosity of central retinal vessels, circumpapillary telangiectasia, swelling of RNFL, or optic disc pallor. Those with other causes of optic neuropathy such as glaucoma, trauma, and exposure to drugs such as ethambutol were excluded from the study. Neuroimaging (magnetic resonance imaging brain and orbits) was done in all patients to rule out compressive, infiltrative, or inflammatory causes of optic neuropathy. All patients were subjected to various tests such as complete hemogram, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, chest X-ray, Mantoux test, venereal disease research laboratory, and neuromyelitis optica antibody to rule out any infectious/inflammatory process. Patients presenting with duration of <2 weeks were excluded to avoid inadvertent inclusion of patients with retrobulbar neuritis. Those patients with clinical features suggestive of LHON were subjected to mutational analysis. Other clinical variables included age, gender, duration, laterality, inter-eye involvement interval, and history of exposure to oxidants in the form of cigarette smoking or alcohol. Written informed consent was taken from all the patients included in the study. The procedures followed were in accordance with our Institutional Ethics Committee and the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000. Ethical approval was taken from the Institutional Ethics committee for the study.

Sample collection

The targeted mitochondrial genome was amplified using genomic DNA, in nine overlapping fragments,[6] and Sanger sequencing was carried out using ABI 3130 sequencer (Applied Biosystems). The three primary mutations are present in the ND1, ND4, and ND6 regions of mitochondrial complex 1. Sequencing was carried out specifically for these regions. DNA sequences of patients were analyzed using SeqScape v2.5 software (Applied Biosystems). The changes were then checked on the MITOMAP database using revised Cambridge Reference Sequence with GenBank number (NC_012920).


  Results Top


Clinical characteristics

The present study included forty clinically suspected LHON patients. The baseline clinical characteristics of the patients are shown in [Table 1] and the phenotypic features in [Table 2]. The average age of onset of our patient group was 23 years. The male:female ratio was 39:1. A total of 26 patients (65%) showed simultaneous involvement of both eyes whereas 13 patients (32.5%) had sequential involvement of both eyes. One patient (2.5%) had uniocular visual loss at presentation. A total of 29 patients (72.5%) had a history of smoking, and 28 (70%) had a history of alcohol intake.
Table 1: Baseline clinical characteristics

Click here to view
Table 2: Phenotypic features

Click here to view


Visual function

The mean overall visual acuity was 1.42 ± 0.47. A total of 24 patients (60%) showed sparing of pupillary reactions. Color vision was affected in 37 patients (92.5%) and contrast sensitivity was decreased in 38 patients (95%). All patients showed evidence of central or centrocecal scotoma on visual field testing. Five of 40 patients (12.5%) showed fundus findings suggestive of acute phase of the disease such as hyperemia of the optic disc, vascular tortuosity, and blurring of disc margins, while 35 patients (87.5%) had optic atrophy suggesting chronic phase of the disease.

Mutational analysis

All forty patients were screened for the three most common mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) mutations (m.G11778A, m.T14484C, and m.G3460A) of which 11 (27.5%) were positive for m.G11778A mutation which was in homoplasmic condition as shown in [Figure 1]. Only one patient was found carrying two primary mutations (m.G11778A and m.T14484C) as shown in [Table 3]. His mother was also found to have heteroplasmy for m.G11778A and homoplasmy for m.T14484C change.
Figure 1: Electrophoretogram showing m.G11778A mutation

Click here to view
Table 3: Genotypic characteristics of the patients

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


LHON is one of the most commonly inherited mitochondrial disorders leading to sequential or simultaneous, subacute vision loss. The mean age of patients in the present study was 22 years, and the results were consistent with previous studies from the various parts of the world.[7],[8],[9] However, the age of onset was slightly earlier compared to that reported from the Netherlands[10] and Atlanta,[11] where it was 24.4 and 27.6 years, respectively. The reported age of onset in this study is around 20–24 years,[11] but the loss may appear early in childhood or late adulthood. The present study also observed predominance of males consistent with previous studies of various ethnicities. However, the percentage of males affected (95%) was considerably higher than that reported from European, North American, and Australian families (77%–90%).[12],[13],[14] An additional factor for the greater number of males in our study could be financial and geographical distances that limit women in India from accessing tertiary care. Fully 65% of our patients showed simultaneous involvement of both eyes. This is comparable to numbers reported by other studies (64%–70%).[10] The time to stabilization of visual acuity was 3.2 months, which is consistent with other studies as well.[11] More than 95% cases of LHON are caused due to one of the three common primary mutations (m.G3460A, m.G11778A, and m.T14484C). The literature review shows that the frequency of these mutations varies considerably in different population[15] as shown in [Table 4]. In our study, m.G11778A was the most prevalent.
Table 4: Frequency of primary mutations in different population

Click here to view


From India, a recent study on the South Indian population showed 12% frequency (11 out of 90 patients) for LHON primary mutations of which 8.9% was detected in m.G11778A, 3.3% for m.T14484C, and none for m.G3460A. In our study, we have found mutations in 27.5% (11 out of 40) of cases and m.G11778A was the only one found. Only, one patient was found to carry two primary mutations (m.G11778A and m.T14484C), and the other positive patients carried the same m.G11778A mutation. There are a few case studies which also show patients carrying two primary mutations (m.G11778A and m.T14484C).[16] In these families, m.T14484C mutation was in homoplasmic condition and m.G11778A in heteroplasmic condition, whereas in our patient, both mutations were in homoplasmic condition. Our results suggest that for the North Indian population studied, m.G11778A seems to be a more prevalent cause for LHON than other primary mutations.

“Secondary” mutations are also sometimes seen in LHON patients, but their pathogenic effect is as yet unclear. It is seen that isolated secondary mutation may not cause LHON, but with the presence of any one of the primary mutations, it may play a role in the development of the disease.[15] There are studies where secondary mutations were found to be associated with disease manifestations, but these are mostly seen to occur in single cases.[17] However, in our study, due to targeted screening for primary mutations, the presence of secondary mutations cannot be ruled out. In addition, 26 patients were seen to carry m.G11719A change, which was reported as polymorphism[18] and may not be involved in disease manifestation.

If targeted testing for common mutations does not identify a pathogenic variant and the clinical suspicion remains high, then complete mtDNA sequencing should be considered. A few other mtDNA changes have been reported in a small number of cases (m.G3700A, m.G3733A, m.G3733C, m.C4171A, m.T10663C, m.G14459A, m.C14482A, m.A14495G, and m.C14568T)[19] in which LHON was the diagnosis, made based on high clinical index. Although the pathogenic significance of these variants has not been proven, in some populations, they have been observed to make up a significant fraction of LHON cases and thus are presumed to be responsible for LHON.[19] Some authors have suggested that when these secondary mutations are present along with primary mutations, they may be causative of LHON.[20]

Being a heterogeneous disorder, mitochondrial disease poses a diagnostic challenge. There can be certain presentations that mimic similar conditions. Since the objective was to study the frequency of three common primary mutations, we did not screen for any other changes.[26]


  Conclusion Top


We reported a frequency of 27.5% of common primary mutation for LHON in the studied North Indian population. Since we have found only one mutation (m.G11778A), we presume that this may be the most prevalent in the northern part of the country. Similar studies involving whole mitochondrial sequencing are required to determine whether there are any secondary mutations involved that have a synergistic effect on the primary mutations or whether secondary mutations by themselves might cause a similar phenotype.

Financial support and sponsorship

This study was financially supported by Intramural AIIMS funding.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
  References Top

1.
Yu-Wai-Man P, Turnbull DM, Chinnery PF. Leber hereditary optic neuropathy. J Med Genet 2002;39:162-9.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]    
2.
Wallace DC, Singh G, Lott MT, Hodge JA, Schurr TG, Lezza AM, et al. Mitochondrial DNA mutation associated with Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy. Science 1988;242:1427-30.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]    
3.
Yen MY, Wang AG, Chang WL, Hsu WM, Liu JH, Wei YH, et al. Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy – The spectrum of mitochondrial DNA mutations in Chinese patients. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2002;46:45-51.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Marotta R, Chin J, Quigley A, Katsabanis S, Kapsa R, Byrne E, et al. Diagnostic screening of mitochondrial DNA mutations in Australian adults 1990-2001. Diagnostic screening of mtDNA mutations. Intern Med J 2004;34:10-9.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]    
5.
Sundaresan P, Kumar SM, Thompson S, Fingert JH. Reduced frequency of known mutations in a cohort of LHON patients from India. Ophthalmic Genet 2010;31:196-9.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]    
6.
Ramos A, Santos C, Alvarez L, Nogués R, Aluja MP. Human mitochondrial DNA complete amplification and sequencing: A new validated primer set that prevents nuclear DNA sequences of mitochondrial origin co-amplification. Electrophoresis 2009;30:1587-93.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Newman NJ. Hereditary optic neuropathies: From the mitochondria to the optic nerve. Am J Ophthalmol 2005;140:517-23.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]    
8.
Giraudet S, Lamirel C, Amati-Bonneau P, Reynier P, Bonneau D, Miléa D, et al. Never too old to harbour a young man's disease? Br J Ophthalmol 2011;95:887, 896-7.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Riordan-Eva P, Sanders MD, Govan GG, Sweeney MG, Da Costa J, Harding AE, et al. The clinical features of Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy defined by the presence of a pathogenic mitochondrial DNA mutation. Brain 1995;118(Pt 2):319-37.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Vansenus AH. Leber's disease in the Netherlands. Doc Ophthalmol 1963;17:1-162.  Back to cited text no. 10
[PUBMED]    
11.
Newman NJ, Lott MT, Wallace DC. The clinical characteristics of pedigrees of Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy with the 11778 mutation. Am J Ophthalmol 1991;111:750-62.  Back to cited text no. 11
[PUBMED]    
12.
Nikoskelainen E, Hoyt WF, Nummelin K. Ophthalmoscopic findings in leber's hereditary optic neuropathy. II. The fundus findings in the affected family members. Arch Ophthalmol 1983;101:1059-68.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Seedorff T. Leber's disease. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1968;46:4-25.  Back to cited text no. 13
[PUBMED]    
14.
Seedorff T. The inheritance of Leber's disease. A genealogical follow-up study. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1985;63:135-45.  Back to cited text no. 14
[PUBMED]    
15.
Abu-Amero KK. Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy: The mitochondrial connection revisited. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol 2011;18:17-23.  Back to cited text no. 15
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
16.
Howell N, Miller NR, Mackey DA, Arnold A, Herrnstadt C, Williams IM, et al. Lightning strikes twice: Leber hereditary optic neuropathy families with two pathogenic mtDNA mutations. J Neuroophthalmol 2002;22:262-9.  Back to cited text no. 16
[PUBMED]    
17.
Yu-Wai-Man P, Chinnery PF. Leber Hereditary Optic Neuropathy. In: Pagon RA, Adam MP, Ardinger HH,et al., editors. GeneReviews®. Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; 1993-2017;2000. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1174/. [Last accessed on 2016 Jun 23].  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Lin L, Chen Y, Tong Y, Zheng Z, Lin J. Analysis of mitochondrial gene mutations in Chinese pedigrees of Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy. Yan Ke Xue Bao 2002;18:147-50.  Back to cited text no. 18
[PUBMED]    
19.
Achilli A, Iommarini L, Olivieri A, Pala M, Hooshiar Kashani B, Reynier P, et al. Rare primary mitochondrial DNA mutations and probable synergistic variants in Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy. PLoS One 2012;7:e42242.  Back to cited text no. 19
[PUBMED]    
20.
Lodi R, Montagna P, Cortelli P, Iotti S, Cevoli S, Carelli V, et al. 'Secondary' 4216/ND1 and 13708/ND5 Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy mitochondrial DNA mutations do not further impairin vivo mitochondrial oxidative metabolism when associated with the 11778/ND4 mitochondrial DNA mutation. Brain 2000;123(Pt 9):1896-902.  Back to cited text no. 20
[PUBMED]    
21.
Puomila A, Hämäläinen P, Kivioja S, Savontaus ML, Koivumäki S, Huoponen K, et al. Epidemiology and penetrance of Leber hereditary optic neuropathy in Finland. Eur J Hum Genet 2007;15:1079-89.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Mackey DA, Oostra RJ, Rosenberg T, Nikoskelainen E, Bronte-Stewart J, Poulton J, et al. Primary pathogenic mtDNA mutations in multigeneration pedigrees with Leber hereditary optic neuropathy. Am J Hum Genet 1996;59:481-5.  Back to cited text no. 22
[PUBMED]    
23.
Rosenberg T, Nørby S, Schwartz M, Saillard J, Magalhães PJ, Leroy D, et al. Prevalence and genetics of Leber hereditary optic neuropathy in the Danish population. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2016;57:1370-5.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Jiang P, Liang M, Zhang J, Gao Y, He Z, Yu H, et al. Prevalence of mitochondrial ND4 mutations in 1281 Han Chinese subjects with Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2015;56:4778-88.  Back to cited text no. 24
[PUBMED]    
25.
Mashima Y, Yamada K, Wakakura M, Kigasawa K, Kudoh J, Shimizu N, et al. Spectrum of pathogenic mitochondrial DNA mutations and clinical features in Japanese families with Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy. Curr Eye Res 1998;17:403-8.  Back to cited text no. 25
[PUBMED]    
26.
Kim JY, Hwang JM, Chang BL, Park SS. Spectrum of the mitochondrial DNA mutations of Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy in Koreans. J Neurol 2003;250:278-81.  Back to cited text no. 26
[PUBMED]    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Abstract
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1028    
    Printed1    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded163    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal