Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 5269
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

   Table of Contents      
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 65  |  Issue : 11  |  Page : 1267-1268

Reply to Pediatric optic neuritis: Points to ponder

1 Department of Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, Aravind Eye Hospital, Tirunelveli, Tamil Nadu, India
2 Department of Neurophthalmology, Aravind Eye Hospital, Tirunelveli, Tamil Nadu, India

Date of Web Publication13-Nov-2017

Correspondence Address:
Rutika Khadse
Aravind Eye Hospital, S. N High Road, Tirunelveli, Tamil Nadu
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_721_17

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Khadse R, Ravindran M, Pawar N, Maharajan P, Rengappa R. Reply to Pediatric optic neuritis: Points to ponder. Indian J Ophthalmol 2017;65:1267-8

How to cite this URL:
Khadse R, Ravindran M, Pawar N, Maharajan P, Rengappa R. Reply to Pediatric optic neuritis: Points to ponder. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2017 [cited 2020 Jul 5];65:1267-8. Available from: http://www.ijo.in/text.asp?2017/65/11/1267/218079


Thank you for showing interest in our study[1] titled “Clinical profile and neuroimaging in pediatric optic neuritis in Indian population: A case series.” We have tried to provide all details of the cases for the clarification of the queries raised. Although it is common to have optic neuritis following vaccination, we had no cases of the same following vaccination in our series.

The patient diagnosed with acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM) in our series was an 8-year-old boy, who presented with loss of vision in both eyes for 3 days, along with a history of headache associated with vomiting and altered sensorium. He also had a history of chikungunya (viral fever) 2 weeks earlier. Investigations such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain scan showed multiple nonspecific lesions in the deep cortical matter, bilaterally, while cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis revealed leukocytosis and absence of oligoclonal bands. The child recovered within 15 days with no signs of recurrence till 1 year of follow-up. Clinical presentation and relevant investigations suggested diagnosis, most likely of monophasic, polysymptomatic ADEM following a viral infection. In a study comparing the features of ADEM and multiple sclerosis (MS), it was found that encephalopathy was present in 10/24 patients with ADEM, whereas no patient had encephalopathy in the MS group (P = 0.001, odds ratio = 0.03) which suggested that for a patient presenting with encephalopathy at the first demyelinating event, MS is less likely compared to a child without encephalopathy.[2],[3]

We have mentioned four cases with MS; among these, one patient (15/F) developed transverse myelitis with urinary incontinence 3 months following the attack of unilateral optic neuritis. MRI spine scan showed active focal-enhancing white matter lesion at D9 level with no involvement of consecutive spinal segments. The patient was negative for neuromyelitis optica (NMO) antibodies. Sequential MRI brain showed lesions which fulfilled McDonald's criteria for dissemination in space and time. CSF analysis was not done as patient and parents denied consent for it. In accordance with the criteria mentioned in a recent article[3] for diagnosing NMO with negative aquaporin antibody, the presence of acute myelitis/optic neuritis should be associated with normal MRI brain/nonspecific lesions/longitudinal extensive transverse myelitis (LETM), etc.[3] In our patient, acute myelitis was associated with MRI brain diagnostic of MS and the absence of LETM in MRI spine. Based on all these features, diagnosis of relapsing-remitting MS was made by the consulting neurologist.

We found abnormalities in the MRI scan of the brain in 26 of 40 patients. Among these 26 patients, only ten patients had focal demyelinating lesions, involving areas of the brain other than the optic nerve. The remaining 16 patients showed other abnormal findings such as isolated optic nerve enhancement (14), tubercular meningitis (1), and ADEM (1) as mentioned in our article.

Financial support and sponsorship


Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

  References Top

Khadse R, Ravindran M, Pawar N, Maharajan P, Rengappa R. Clinical profile and neuroimaging in pediatric optic neuritis in Indian population: A case series. Indian J Ophthalmol 2017;65:242-5.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
Alper G, Heyman R, Wang L. Multiple sclerosis and acute disseminated encephalomyelitis diagnosed in children after long-term follow-up: Comparison of presenting features. Dev Med Child Neurol 2009;51:480-6.  Back to cited text no. 2
Chou IJ, Wang HS, Whitehouse WP, Constantinescu CS. Paediatric multiple sclerosis: Update on diagnostic criteria, imaging, histopathology and treatment choices. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2016;16:68.  Back to cited text no. 3


    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

  In this article

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded108    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal