Glyxambi
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 1537
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page


 
   Table of Contents      
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 65  |  Issue : 9  |  Page : 808-812

Higher-order aberration 4 years after corneal collagen cross-linking


1 School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2 AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Date of Submission06-Jan-2017
Date of Acceptance04-Jul-2017
Date of Web Publication14-Sep-2017

Correspondence Address:
Mohammad Naderan
School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran
Iran
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_21_17

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Purpose: Corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) is a treatment strategy used in keratoconic eyes. Evaluation of long-term changes of higher-order aberrations (HOAs) after CXL is useful in understanding the efficacy of this procedure in improving optical, refractive, and visual acuity. This study aims to investigate the long-term effect of CXL on ocular HOA in patients with progressive keratoconus (KC). Methods: Using an OPD-Scan II aberrometer, ocular HOAs measurements of 56 eyes of 56 patients that underwent CXL was evaluated at the baseline, 1, 2, and 4 years after the procedure. All OPD-Scan measurements were decomposed into Zernike coefficients from 3rd to 6th order. Results: The results revealed that except for a few parameters, most of the aberration parameters continuously decreased during the study. In the 4-year postoperative period, a statistically significant improvement in all HOA parameters except 5th order Zernike polynomials (Z51, Z5−1, Z53, Z5−3, Z55, and Z5−5) was observed. All the values significantly decreased compared to the preoperative measurements (P < 0.05). The mean ± standard deviation (SD) root mean square of the 3rd, 4th, and the 5th order as well as coma, coma like, and total HOA parameters were significantly decreased compared to both preoperative and previous visits (P < 0.001). There were significant correlations between preoperative measurements of HOAs parameters with best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) including Z31, Z3−1, Z40, Z51, and Z42. Moreover, all the HOAs parameters in 4 years after the CXL were significantly correlated with BCVA (P < 0.05). Conclusion: CXL is effective in improving HOA parameters in eyes with progressive KC during a long-term follow-up.

Keywords: Aberrations, corneal cross-linking, keratoconus, OPD-Scan II, wavefront analysis


How to cite this article:
Naderan M, Jahanrad A. Higher-order aberration 4 years after corneal collagen cross-linking. Indian J Ophthalmol 2017;65:808-12

How to cite this URL:
Naderan M, Jahanrad A. Higher-order aberration 4 years after corneal collagen cross-linking. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2017 [cited 2019 Oct 18];65:808-12. Available from: http://www.ijo.in/text.asp?2017/65/9/808/214637

Keratoconus (KC) is a progressive corneal ectatic disorder causing corneal thinning, irregular astigmatism, myopia, and increased higher-order aberrations (HOAs) which result in vision deterioration, even blindness.[1],[2] Corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) is a treatment strategy in keratoconic eyes that was first introduced in 2003.[3] Based on a pathological and biomechanical approach, this method aimed to slow down and possibly arrest the progression of KC and decrease the need for subsequent corneal keratoplasty that was necessary in almost all severe cases of KC.[3],[4],[5] CXL is based on photopolymerization of collagen fibers and increases intra- and inter-fibrillar covalent bonds and improves corneal resistance specifically against stretching.[5],[6],[7] Postoperative studies have also been able to demonstrate the efficacy of this method in improving clinical findings as well as topographical, tomographical and aberrometeric indices in adults as well as children and adolescents.[8],[9],[10],[11],[12],[13]

HOAs are among the important refractive and visual quality properties of the human ocular system and the decreased the level of some visual features such as contrast sensitivity have been partially attributed to these parameters.[14],[15] Evaluation of long-term changes of HOAs after CXL is useful in understanding the efficacy of CXL on improving optical, refractive, and visual acuity (VA). Researchers have shown a significant reduction in HOA parameters following CXL in patients with progressive KC.[10] This study was designed to evaluate the effect of CXL on ocular HOAs in patients with progressive KC 4 years after the procedure and using OPD-Scan II aberrometer.


  Methods Top


Study design

A prospective study was conducted at the cornea clinic of the AJA University Hospital, Tehran, Iran from 2011 to 2016. The protocols of this study were in accordance with the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki, and the approval was obtained from the ethics committee of the clinic. After explaining the purpose of the study, signed informed consent was obtained from those who agreed to participate.

Study population

Fifty-six eyes of 56 patients aged 18–50 years with progressive KC were enrolled in the study. The diagnosis of KC was based on corneal topographic map and anterior and posterior elevation pattern by optical path difference Scan II (OPD-Scan II; Nidek Co., Ltd., Gamagori, Japan) as well as at least one of the clinical diagnostic signs such as Fleischer ring, Vogt's striae, Munson's sign, Rizzuti's sign, conical protrusion of the cornea at the apex, or corneal thinning by means of slit-lamp biomicroscopy. KC progression was defined as an increase of 1.00 diopter (D) or more in the steepest keratometric measurement, an increase of 1.00 D or more in manifest cylinder, or an increase of 0.50 D or more in manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) in a 24-month period. Patients with thinnest corneal thickness <400 μm, history of ocular trauma or surgery, corneal scarring or corneal opacities, history of any concurrent ophthalmic disorders such as glaucoma, severe dry eye, or corneal infections, history of autoimmune or connective tissue disorders, patients with pregnancy or nursing women, and patients with poor compliance were excluded from the study.

Data collection

All participants underwent extensive ocular examinations, including uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), and best-spectacle corrected visual acuity (BCVA), MRSE, Goldmann tonometry, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, ultrasound pachymetry, and topographic and tomographic imaging. Only the right eye of each participant was included in this study. The main outcome measures were HOA parameters which were evaluated along with mean keratometry (K), central corneal thickness (CCT), MRSE, UCVA, and BCVA at the baseline (preoperative), and then, at 1, 2, and 4 years after the treatment.

Aberrometry and wavefront analysis

Aberrometry and wavefront measurement were performed using OPD-Scan II. The OPD-Scan II aberrometer using placido-based topography and principle of scanning retinoscopy/skiascopy measures corneal, and whole eye aberrations. Patients-wearing contact lenses were asked to stop using them at least 3 weeks before the aberrometry. To avoid any possible diurnal variations, the examinations were performed between 9 am and 12 pm. All OPD-Scan measurements were performed under dark examination (2.2 Lux) over a 6 mm diameter zone centered on the corneal vertex, after 2 min of dark adaptation, three consecutive measurements were taken, and the average values were decomposed into Zernike coefficients. The Zernike coefficients for corneal first surface aberrations parameters from 3rd to 6th order were studied. Moreover, root mean square (RMS) value for primary coma aberration (Z3±1), and coma-like aberration (primary and secondary coma aberration [Z3±1 and Z5±1]), and total HOA from third- to sixth-order were calculated. The detailed information regarding the Zernike polynomials has been discussed elsewhere.[16],[17]

Corneal cross-linking procedure

The CXL procedure was performed according to the protocol described by Wollensak et al. with the following details.[3],[18] After the administration of tetracaine hydrochloride for topical anesthesia, a 10% alcohol-saturated sponge was applied to the central cornea for 30 s, and the corneal epithelium was removed over the central 9.0 mm by mechanical debridement with a Hockey knife. Then, every 2 min, two drops of riboflavin 0.1% with dextran 20% solution was instilled onto the cornea for 30 min until the stroma was completely penetrated, and the aqueous was stained yellow. Subsequently, a 9.0 mm diameter circular beam of ultraviolet A (UVA) irradiation which was emitted from a solid-state device (UV-X System, Peschke Meditrade GmbH, Huenenberg, Switzerland), 5 cm from the corneal apex with a wavelength of 370 ± 5 nm and an irradiance of 3 mW/cm2 or 5.4 J/cm2 was applied to the cornea for 30 min. During the UV exposure, one drop of riboflavin solution was again applied every 2 min. Antibiotic and corticosteroid drops were administered after the procedure, and a therapeutic contact lens was placed on the eye for 7 days. Patients were visited on the 7th day to remove the contact lenses and evaluate epithelial healing.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics software (Version 22; IBM Inc., Armonk, New York, USA). The data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). The normal distribution of the data was confirmed using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Comparison of the measurements was performed using the repeated measures analysis of variance with Bonferroni adjustment for multiple comparisons. Pairwise comparisons were performed using paired t-test. The Pearson correlation analysis was performed to evaluate the relationship between HOAs parameters and UCVA and BCVA. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.


  Results Top


A total of 56 eyes of 56 patients with progressive KC were enrolled in this study. No patients were lost to follow-up, and all patients completed the examination sessions. No patients suffered postoperation or long-term complication. The mean age of the study population was 31 ± 6 years. There were 31 male (55.3%) and 25 female (44.7%). All keratoconic eyes had stage 2 of KC severity according to Amsler–Krumeich classification.[19],[20] Preoperative and postoperative follow-up findings of the patients with KC are shown in [Table 1]. Significant decreases in mean K, MRSE, UCVA, and BCVA, and a significant increase in CCT was observed in the KC patients during the study (P < 0.001, all comparisons).

Comparison of the HOA parameters at the baseline and 1st, 2nd, and 4th year after CXL are demonstrated in [Table 2]. The results revealed except a few parameters most of the aberration parameters were continuously decreased during the study. Analysis of the HOA parameters at the 4-year postoperation has shown statistically significant improvement in all HOA parameters (P < 0.001, all comparisons) except 5th order Zernike polynomials (Z51, Z5−1, Z53, Z5−3, Z55, Z5−5, P > 0.05). All the values significantly decreased compared to the preoperative measurements (P < 0.05). The mean ± SD RMS of the 3rd, 4th, and the 5th order as well as coma, coma-like, and total HOA parameters were significantly decreased compared to both preoperative and previous visits (P < 0.001).
Table 1: Preoperative and follow.up clinical findings of the patients with keratoconus

Click here to view
Table 2: Comparison of the preoperative and follow-up values of all higher-order aberration parameters after corneal collagen cross-linking in patients with keratoconus

Click here to view


There were significant correlations between preoperative measurements of HOAs parameters with BCVA including Z31 (P < 0.001, r = 0.741), Z3−1 (P = 0.002, r = 0.653), Z40 (P < 0.001, r = 0.625), Z51 (P = 0.012, r = 0.541), and Z42 (P = 0.025, r = 0.482). Moreover, all of the HOAs parameters in 4 years after the CXL were significantly correlated with BCVA (P < 0.05). The highest correlations were found in Z31 (P < 0.001, r = 0.765), Z51 (P ≤ 0.001, r = 0.701), total HOA (P < 0.001, r = 0.688), Z40 (P < 0.001, r = 0.650), and Z42 (P = 0.008, r = 0.555).


  Discussion Top


CXL is a treatment recommended for patients with progressive KC and is the only available approach that relies on pathophysiological bases of the disease. Longitudinal and long-term follow-up studies have shown an acceptable safety for this technique, and extremely rare complications have been reported in patients.[21],[22],[23],[24],[25] CXL that was originally introduced to slow or ideally prevent further progression of KC has shown to be efficient in improvement of clinical, topographical, and aberrometric indices.[8],[10],[11],[13] As with most of the studies in the literature, we found a significant improvement in mean K, CCT, MRSE, UCVA, and BCVA 4-year-postoperation, which indicates the corneal stability induced by CXL.[21],[22],[23],[24],[25]

One of the optical sequelae of KC is increased HOAs that results in vision deterioration and visual dysfunction.[26] In this study, we found that all ocular aberrations except 5th order Zernike polynomials significantly decreased in the course of the study. These findings are in agreement with those of other studies. A decrease in total HOAs, total spherical aberration, and total coma after CXL was reported by previous studies that used Nidek OPD-Scan.[8],[13] Ghanem et al.[11] reported a significant reduction in coma, trefoil, secondary astigmatism, quatrefoil, secondary coma, and secondary tetrafoil 2 years after CXL. In a study by Greenstein et al.,[10] on 96 eyes in a 12-month follow-up, researchers reported a significant reduction of total anterior corneal HOAs, total coma, 3rd order coma, and vertical coma. In our study, total anterior corneal HOAs, total HOAs, total coma, coma like, 3rd, 4th, and 5th order coma showed significant reduction in the first 12 months. However, most of the other aberration parameters showed significant reduction only after 24 months.

Caporossi et al.[22] found a statistically significant reduction in coma aberration between preoperative and 1-month postoperative values which was extended up to 4-year-follow-up. They reported 100% corneal stability among their patients in a 4-year follow-up after CXL.[22] However, they did not observe any significant changes in spherical aberration.[22] O'Brart et al.[24] in 2013 reported a significant decrease in secondary astigmatism, coma, and pentafoil in the 1st year postoperative compared with preoperative values. They also found that after 4–6 years follow-up, only secondary astigmatism and coma were significantly decreased compared with preoperative values.[24] They further extended their follow-up to 7 years after CXL and reported a significant decrease in secondary astigmatism and coma compared to preoperative values.[27] The improvement in HOAs parameters in patients with KC is attributed to the corneal flattening of the cone apex and reduced steepening of the cornea caused by CXL.[11]

In our study, there was a significant correlation between preoperative and postoperative HOAs and BCVA. Nevertheless, no significant correlation was observed between the improvement in HOAs values and VA. This finding has been reported in other studies.[10],[11] However, our findings were similar to Ghanem et al.[11] reported a significant correlation between postoperative BCVA and corneal HOAs. Greenstein et al.[10] found no significant correlation between improvement in HOAs parameters and improvement in UCVA and BCVA after CXL.

Study limitations

This study has some limitations. Unfortunately, we did not have access to anterior and posterior corneal HOAs, which made a comparison of these aberrations with similar studies impossible. Another limitation is that we measured HOAs parameters only with an OPD-Scan, and we could not evaluate the patients with other devices, therefore, our results may be limited to only OPD-Scan II aberrometer and could not be generalized to other devices.


  Conclusion Top


Our study showed continuous decrease in ocular HOAs during the long-term follow-up after CXL in patients with KC. It would be suggested that CXL is an effective procedure in correcting aberration parameters in KC patients.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
  References Top

1.
Romero-Jiménez M, Santodomingo-Rubido J, Wolffsohn JS. Keratoconus: A review. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2010;33:157-66.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Naderan M, Shoar S, Rezagholizadeh F, Zolfaghari M, Naderan M. Characteristics and associations of keratoconus patients. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2015;38:199-205.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Wollensak G, Spoerl E, Seiler T. Riboflavin/ultraviolet-a-induced collagen crosslinking for the treatment of keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol 2003;135:620-7.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Kohlhaas M, Spoerl E, Schilde T, Unger G, Wittig C, Pillunat LE, et al. Biomechanical evidence of the distribution of cross-links in corneas treated with riboflavin and ultraviolet A light. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006;32:279-83.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Wollensak G, Spoerl E, Wilsch M, Seiler T. Endothelial cell damage after riboflavin-ultraviolet-A treatment in the rabbit. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003;29:1786-90.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Mazzotta C, Balestrazzi A, Traversi C, Baiocchi S, Caporossi T, Tommasi C, et al. Treatment of progressive keratoconus by riboflavin-UVA-induced cross-linking of corneal collagen: Ultrastructural analysis by heidelberg retinal tomograph II in vivo confocal microscopy in humans. Cornea 2007;26:390-7.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Mazzotta C, Caporossi T, Denaro R, Bovone C, Sparano C, Paradiso A, et al. Morphological and functional correlations in riboflavin UV A corneal collagen cross-linking for keratoconus. Acta Ophthalmol 2012;90:259-65.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Vinciguerra P, Albè E, Trazza S, Rosetta P, Vinciguerra R, Seiler T, et al. Refractive, topographic, tomographic, and aberrometric analysis of keratoconic eyes undergoing corneal cross-linking. Ophthalmology 2009;116:369-78.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Vinciguerra P, Albé E, Frueh BE, Trazza S, Epstein D. Two-year corneal cross-linking results in patients younger than 18 years with documented progressive keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol 2012;154:520-6.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Greenstein SA, Fry KL, Hersh MJ, Hersh PS. Higher-order aberrations after corneal collagen crosslinking for keratoconus and corneal ectasia. J Cataract Refract Surg 2012;38:292-302.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Ghanem RC, Santhiago MR, Berti T, Netto MV, Ghanem VC. Topographic, corneal wavefront, and refractive outcomes 2 years after collagen crosslinking for progressive keratoconus. Cornea 2014;33:43-8.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Hassan Z, Modis L, Szalai E, Berta A, Nemeth G. Scheimpflug imaged corneal changes on anterior and posterior surfaces after collagen cross-linking. Int J Ophthalmol 2014;7:313-6.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Vinciguerra P, Albè E, Trazza S, Seiler T, Epstein D. Intraoperative and postoperative effects of corneal collagen cross-linking on progressive keratoconus. Arch Ophthalmol 2009;127:1258-65.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Marcos S. Aberrations and visual performance following standard laser vision correction. J Refract Surg 2001;17:S596-601.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Bailey MD, Mitchell GL, Dhaliwal DK, Boxer Wachler BS, Zadnik K. Patient satisfaction and visual symptoms after laser in situ keratomileusis. Ophthalmology 2003;110:1371-8.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Thibos LN, Bradley A, Hong X. A statistical model of the aberration structure of normal, well-corrected eyes. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2002;22:427-33.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Maeda N, Fujikado T, Kuroda T, Mihashi T, Hirohara Y, Nishida K, et al. Wavefront aberrations measured with Hartmann-Shack sensor in patients with keratoconus. Ophthalmology 2002;109:1996-2003.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Farjadnia M, Naderan M. Corneal cross-linking treatment of keratoconus. Oman J Ophthalmol 2015;8:86-91.  Back to cited text no. 18
  [Full text]  
19.
Krumeich JH, Daniel J, Knülle A. Live-epikeratophakia for keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg 1998;24:456-63.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Naderan M, Shoar S, Kamaleddin MA, Rajabi MT, Naderan M, Khodadadi M, et al. Keratoconus clinical findings according to different classifications. Cornea 2015;34:1005-11.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Hashemi H, Seyedian MA, Miraftab M, Fotouhi A, Asgari S. Corneal collagen cross-linking with riboflavin and ultraviolet a irradiation for keratoconus: Long-term results. Ophthalmology 2013;120:1515-20.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Caporossi A, Mazzotta C, Baiocchi S, Caporossi T. Long-term results of riboflavin ultraviolet a corneal collagen cross-linking for keratoconus in italy: The siena eye cross study. Am J Ophthalmol 2010;149:585-93.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Kymionis GD, Grentzelos MA, Liakopoulos DA, Paraskevopoulos TA, Klados NE, Tsoulnaras KI, et al. Long-term follow-up of corneal collagen cross-linking for keratoconus – The cretan study. Cornea 2014;33:1071-9.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
O'Brart DP, Kwong TQ, Patel P, McDonald RJ, O'Brart NA. Long-term follow-up of riboflavin/ultraviolet A (370 nm) corneal collagen cross-linking to halt the progression of keratoconus. Br J Ophthalmol 2013;97:433-7.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Nicula C, Nicula D, Popescu R, Saplonţai-Pop A. Corneal collagen cross-linking in keratoconus -- long-term prospective study. J Fr Ophtalmol 2015;38:199-205.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Schlegel Z, Lteif Y, Bains HS, Gatinel D. Total, corneal, and internal ocular optical aberrations in patients with keratoconus. J Refract Surg 2009;25:S951-7.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
O'Brart DP, Patel P, Lascaratos G, Wagh VK, Tam C, Lee J, et al. Corneal cross-linking to halt the progression of keratoconus and corneal ectasia: Seven-year follow-up. Am J Ophthalmol 2015;160:1154-63.  Back to cited text no. 27
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Abstract
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed712    
    Printed1    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded153    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal