Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 3969
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

   Table of Contents      
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 66  |  Issue : 12  |  Page : 1838-1839

Commentary: Periocular topotecan for retinoblastoma

Department of Vitreoretina and Ocular Oncology, Medical Research Foundation, 18, College Road, Chennai, India

Date of Web Publication19-Nov-2018

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Vikas Khetan
Department of Vitreoretina and Ocular Oncology, Medical Research Foundation, 18, College Road, Chennai - 600 006
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1626_18

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Sharma M, Khetan V. Commentary: Periocular topotecan for retinoblastoma. Indian J Ophthalmol 2018;66:1838-9

How to cite this URL:
Sharma M, Khetan V. Commentary: Periocular topotecan for retinoblastoma. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2018 [cited 2020 Jul 16];66:1838-9. Available from: http://www.ijo.in/text.asp?2018/66/12/1838/245615

We have long surpassed the era when enucleation or external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) was the only option for managing eyes with advanced retinoblastoma. Despite the groundbreaking advancements over the past few decades in the field of retinoblastoma management, persistant/recurrent vitreous seeds continue to remain the nemesis of ocular oncologists all over the world.

Shield et al. reported that intravenous chemotherapy could salvage only 30% of eyes with diffuse vitreous seeds.[1] The relative resistance of vitreous seeds to systemic chemotherapy can be attributed to the avascularity of vitreous humor and has always been an impetus for exploring additional and alternate methods of more effective drug delivery into the vitreous. Wilson et al. found that cryotherapy increases the access of systemic chemotherapy into the vitreous.[2] Pascual Pasto et al. studied rabbit eyes and found that inhibition of blood–retinal barrier by systemic pantoprazole can lead to increased delivery of chemotherapy into vitreous.[3]

The acceptance of intravitreal chemotherapy as a safe method of drug delivery was a quantam leap in the attempts to control the vitreous seeds.[4] Shields et al. achieved 100% vitreous seed control and 88% globe salvage over 3-year follow-up using intravitreal melphalan and/or topotecan. Employing enhanced safety techniques including choosing the correct site for injection in a region of least or no seeding, triple freeze–thaw cryotherapy at the needle site on withdrawal, and 1 min of constant ocular irrigation, they did not note any case of extraocular extension during 192 injections.[4] Combining intra-arterial chemotherapy with intravitreal chemotherapy has further improved globe salvage in eyes with advanced retinoblastoma.[5] Despite all the precautions, there is always a risk of extraocular tumor spread from intravitreal while injecting an eye with active tumor due to spillover, reflux, or tumor growth along the needle track.[6] Development of endophthalmitis after intravitreal injection in an eye with retinoblastoma, especially in developing countries, is, needless to say, a dreaded complication.

Periocular chemotherapy is a relatively safer technique in this regard, as the chemotherapeutic drug is injected into the subtenon's space, thus avoiding any breach in the ocular integrity. Periocular carboplatin has been used in conjunction with systemic chemotherapy for retinoblastoma over two decades. Carcaboso et al. found considerable vitreous levels of topotecan in rabbit eyes after periocular delivery, as a consequence of a favored passage across the blood–retinal barrier.[7] Up to 2 mg periocular topotecan (POT) is considered safe and can be an effective alternative to intravitreal chemotherapy for controlling vitreous seeds.[8] Various modalities of periocular drug delivery have been explored by various authors including episcleral implants, fibrin sealants, and nanomolecular composition. Though periocular chemotherapy entails a risk of optic atrophy and muscle fibrosis, which can lead to strabismus and render enucleation rather difficult, these complications are seen mostly with periocular carboplatin. Periorbital topotecan is associated with mild and transient side effects such as eyelid edema and chemosis.

The efficacy of POT in tumor regression has been reported previously. In an article in the current issue of IJO, Sthapit et al. have studied the efficacy of POT along with systemic chemotherapy in managing focal and diffuse vitreous seeds. The author could achieve remission of vitreous seeds (VS) in 63% of eyes and eye salvage in 95% of eyes with focal vitreous seeds and 68% of eyes with diffuse seeds.[9] The complications associated with POT were mild and transient and no metastasis was noted.

In our opinion, POT is a safer alternative to intravitreal chemotherapy, especially in eyes with diffuse VS where finding a safe sight for injection is challenging. POT achieves good VS control with minimal complications. The results so far have been promising and there is a need for larger studies with longer follow-up to corroborate the results.

  References Top

Shields CL, Mashayekhi A, Au AK, Czyz C, Leahey A, Meadows AT, et al. The International Classification of Retinoblastoma predicts chemoreduction success. Ophthalmology 2006;113:2276-80.  Back to cited text no. 1
Wilson TW, Chan HSL, Moselhy GM, Heydt DD, Frey CM, Gallie BL. Penetration of chemotherapy into vitreous is increased by cryotherapy and cyclosporine in rabbits. Arch Ophthalmol 1996;114:1390-5.  Back to cited text no. 2
Pascual-Pasto G, Olaciregui NG, Opezzo JAW, Castillo-Ecija H, Cuadrado-Vilanova M, Paco S, et al. Increased delivery of chemotherapy to the vitreous by inhibition of the blood-retinal barrier. J Control Release Off J Control Release Soc 2017;264:34-44.  Back to cited text no. 3
Shields CL, Douglass AM, Beggache M, Say EAT, Shields JA. Intravitreous chemotherapy for active vitreous seeding from retinoblastoma: Outcomes After 192 Consecutive Injections. The 2015 Howard Naquin Lecture. Retina Phila Pa 2016;36:1184-90.  Back to cited text no. 4
Shields CL, Alset AE, Say EAT, Caywood E, Jabbour P, Shields JA. Retinoblastoma control with primary intra-arterial chemotherapy: Outcomes before and during the intravitreal chemotherapy era. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 2016;53:275-84.  Back to cited text no. 5
Munier FL, Gaillard M-C, Balmer A, Beck-Popovic M. Intravitreal chemotherapy for vitreous seeding in retinoblastoma: Recent advances and perspectives. Saudi J Ophthalmol 2013;27:147-50.  Back to cited text no. 6
Carcaboso AM, Bramuglia GF, Chantada G, Fandiño AC, Chiappetta D, Dávila G, et al. Topotecan vitreous levels after periocular or intravenous delivery in rabbits: An alternative for retinoblastoma chemotherapy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007;48:3761-7.  Back to cited text no. 7
Chantada GL, Fandino AC, Carcaboso AM, Lagomarsino E, de Davila MTG, Guitter MR, et al. A phase I study of periocular topotecan in children with intraocular retinoblastoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009;50:1492-6.  Back to cited text no. 8
Sthapit PR, Rao R, Honavar SG. Periocular topotecan for vitreous seeds in retinoblastoma. Indian J Ophthalmol 2018;66:1833-8.  Back to cited text no. 9
  [Full text]  


    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

  In this article

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded109    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal