Glyxambi
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 461
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

   Table of Contents      
COMMENTARY
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 66  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 272

The Mini-Monoka punctocanaliculoplasty


Oculoplasty and Ocular Oncology Unit, Institute of Ophthalmology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College and Hospital, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh, India

Date of Web Publication30-Jan-2018

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Md. Shahid Alam
Institute of Ophthalmology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College and Hospital, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1191_17

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Alam MS. The Mini-Monoka punctocanaliculoplasty. Indian J Ophthalmol 2018;66:272

How to cite this URL:
Alam MS. The Mini-Monoka punctocanaliculoplasty. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2018 [cited 2019 Dec 11];66:272. Available from: http://www.ijo.in/text.asp?2018/66/2/272/224070



Punctal stenosis is an elusive disorder with most of the cases being idiopathic.[1] Antiglaucoma medications, chronic blepharitis, involutional changes, and cicatricial disorders are however some of the recognized causes.[1],[2] It is really disheartening to notice that while there is a plethora of literature on the management of obstruction of the distant lacrimal system, there is a paucity for that of the proximal lacrimal system, including punctal stenosis. Management of punctal stenosis along with other proximal lacrimal system obstruction is challenging, and so far, there is no clear guideline or management protocol.

The basic principles in managing punctal stenosis involve creating an adequate opening, maintaining apposition of the punctum to the lacus lacrimalis, and preserving the lacrimal pump. Numerous procedures have been tried and described with varying success rates. The 3-snip punctoplasty however remains the most popular and is widely practiced by oculoplastic surgeons as well as general ophthalmologists with a reported anatomical success rate of 94.1% and a functional one of 62.5%.[3]

Over the past few years, concerns have been raised regarding the procedure violating the anatomical boundaries and providing an ineffective tear access from the lacrimal lake to the punctal opening, leading to a poor functional outcome: often resulting in significant epiphora despite a patent lacrimal system. This was proved in the study by Shahid et al., where the anatomical success was 91% but the functional success dropped down to a significant low of 64%.[3]

The remedy was partially provided by the rectangular 3-snip where an ampullectomy was done with two vertical snips along the medial and lateral boundaries of the vertical canaliculus (described as 2-snip by Shahid et al.).[3] This modification of the routine triangular 3-snip preserved the horizontal portion of the canaliculus and provided an opening much closer to the anatomy of a normal punctum. The procedure had a markedly improved functional success rate of 94%.[4]

Two main problems associated with the management of punctal stenosis are restenosis and associated canalicular fibrosis. While the rectangular 3-snip addresses the restenosis problem, it still has no answer for the associated canalicular fibrosis which is seen in almost 46% of cases.[5] Punctal dilation augmented with Mini-Monoka, which is termed as Mini-Monoka punctoplasty(Mini-Monoka punctocanaliculoplasty [MMPC]) by Hussain et al., not only preserves the normal punctal anatomy but also addresses the associated canalicular fibrosis.[5] Although the use of Mini-Monoka is well established during the reconstruction of traumatic eyelid margin injuries involving the canaliculus,[6] it has not been considered widely for other proximal lacrimal system pathologies. Kashkouli et al. describe the use of these stents in combination with 1-snip punctoplasty for acquired punctal stenosis with 85% functional success.[7]

Gupta,et al. have reported their results of cases of primary punctal stenosis managed by punctal dilation and Mini-Monoka with anatomical and functional success of 93.3%.[8] Their follow-up period of 6 months is long enough to suggest that it prevents restenosis. It would have been better had they included the cases associated with canalicular fibrosis and compared the results since most of the cases of punctal stenosis have associated canalicular fibrosis.[7] The length of the Mini-Monoka stent is 25 mm and it is essential to trim the excess length to both allow easy passage and prevent intubation of the distal lacrimal system and stent migration.

The MMPC offers promising outcomes for cases of punctal stenosis whether isolated or associated with canalicular fibrosis. The rectangular 3-snip punctoplasty too has good success rates and cannot be completely ruled out as a management option, especially when Monoka may not be universally affordable.



 
  References Top

1.
Chak M, Irvine F. Rectangular 3-snip punctoplasty outcomes: Preservation of the lacrimal pump in punctoplasty surgery. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2009;25:134-5.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]    
2.
Kashkouli MB, Beigi B, Murthy R, Astbury N. Acquired external punctal stenosis: Etiology and associated findings. Am J Ophthalmol 2003;136:1079-84.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]    
3.
Shahid H, Sandhu A, Keenan T, Pearson A. Factors affecting outcome of punctoplasty surgery: A review of 205 cases. Br J Ophthalmol 2008;92:1689-92.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]    
4.
Caesar RH, McNab AA. A brief history of punctoplasty: The 3-snip revisited. Eye (Lond) 2005;19:16-8.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]    
5.
Hussain RN, Kanani H, McMullan T. Use of mini-monoka stents for punctal/canalicular stenosis. Br J Ophthalmol 2012;96:671-3.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]    
6.
Alam MS, Mehta NS, Mukherjee B. Anatomical and functional outcomes of canalicular laceration repair with self retaining mini-MONOKA stent. Saudi J Ophthalmol 2017;31:135-9.  Back to cited text no. 6
[PUBMED]    
7.
Kashkouli MB, Beigi B, Astbury N. Acquired external punctal stenosis: Surgical management and long-term follow-up. Orbit 2005;24:73-8.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]    
8.
Gupta S, Ali MJ, Ali MH, Naik MN. Assessing the outcomes of mini-Monoka stent dilatation for primary punctal stenosis using the lacrimal symptom questionnaire. Indian J Ophthalmol 2018;66:269-71.  Back to cited text no. 8
  [Full text]  




 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed348    
    Printed0    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded98    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal