• Users Online: 40349
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

   Table of Contents      
PHOTO ESSAY
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 66  |  Issue : 5  |  Page : 693-694

Diagnostic positron emission tomography-computed tomography in clinically elusive giant cell arteritis


1 Department of Head & Neck, University College London Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK
2 Undergraduate Student, Kings College London, London, UK
3 Department of Ophthalmology, Royal Free Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

Date of Submission18-Oct-2017
Date of Acceptance30-Dec-2017
Date of Web Publication20-Apr-2018

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Ryian Mohamed
University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London
UK
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_998_17

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Keywords: Diagnosis, giant cell arteritis, positron emission tomography-computed tomography


How to cite this article:
Mohamed R, Djama D, Ayoub T. Diagnostic positron emission tomography-computed tomography in clinically elusive giant cell arteritis. Indian J Ophthalmol 2018;66:693-4

How to cite this URL:
Mohamed R, Djama D, Ayoub T. Diagnostic positron emission tomography-computed tomography in clinically elusive giant cell arteritis. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2018 [cited 2024 Mar 29];66:693-4. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/ijo/pages/default.aspx/text.asp?2018/66/5/693/230691



Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is one of the handful of true ophthalmological emergencies, and the difficulty of biopsy confirmation (biopsy false negative rate = 15%–70%[1]) means that treatment is often started on clinical grounds alone. This means that a small number of patients will be started on years of steroid treatment unnecessarily and subsequently find themselves exposed to all the complications of steroid use. It is therefore imperative that a definitive diagnosis is established, since most patients will require urgent and long-term steroid use exposing them to their attendant complications.

A recent case of a 75-year-old Caucasian woman with a 4-day history of pains around the temple regions and eyes highlighted to the authors the increasingly important role of positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) in clinically elusive GCA. The patient had a completely normal examination with visual acuities of 6/6 in the right eye and 6/9 in the left eye. Her temporal arteries were nonrigid and nontender with a borderline elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) of 50 mm/h. The rest of her blood workup was within normal limits.

Despite the nontender arteries, the presence of temporal headaches (which may be present in GCA despite nontender temporal arteries and is likely due to intracranial vascular ischemia [2]), and given her age and ethnicity, a PET-CT was arranged. This showed intense hypermetabolism within the thoracic aorta [Figure 1]. This finding is in keeping with active large-vessel vasculitis, thus confirming her diagnosis as GCA.[3] Changes in the cervical and temporal arteries were not found as these vessels are often too small for hypermetabolism to be radiologically detectable.[4] Due to the radiological diagnosis and the patient's rapid response to steroid treatment, temporal artery biopsy was not undertaken.
Figure 1: Positron emission tomography-computed tomography: Computed tomography component showing intense hypermetabolism within the thoracic aorta

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


It is important to note that PET-CT picks up inflammation alone and is not specific for etiology.[3] Clinical correlation and response to steroid treatment is therefore a must, especially as other pathologies may cause a similar radiological picture, for instance, infective vasculitides [3] which can be clinically disastrous if steroids are started.

PET-CT has several advantages over other imaging modalities. For example, there is less operator variability that with ultrasonography/Doppler. Furthermore, although magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an alternative in certain health-care settings, MRI provides a limited area of coverage, which may increase false-negative rates since temporal arteries need not necessarily show signs of inflammation in all cases of GCA. PET-CT on the other hand allows head to toe coverage.


  Conclusion Top


In suspected GCA, PET-CT is a useful and noninvasive diagnostic imaging modality and a promising addition in the armamentarium of investigations, especially in atypical presentations or when ESR elevation is borderline.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Balink H, Bennink RJ, van Eck-Smit BL, Verberne HJ. The role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in large-vessel vasculitis: Appropriateness of current classification criteria? Biomed Res Int 2014;2014: 687608.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]    
2.
Ghanchi F. Giant cell – Temporal – Arteritis (GCA) in Ophthalmic Practice. The Royal College of Ophthalmolgists; 2010.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Zerizer I, Tan K, Khan S, Barwick T, Marzola MC, Rubello D, et al. Role of FDG-PET and PET/CT in the diagnosis and management of vasculitis. Eur J Radiol 2010;73:504-9.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]    
4.
Patil P, Karia N, Jain S, Dasgupta B. Giant cell arteritis: A review. Eye Brain 2013;5:23-33.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]


This article has been cited by
1 Comment on: Diagnostic positron emission tomography–computed tomography in clinically elusive giant cell arteritis
Sonali Gupta, Shreyans Jain
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology. 2018; 66(11): 1655
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Response to comment on: Diagnostic positron emission tomography-computed tomography in clinically elusive giant cell arteritis
Ryian Mohamed
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology. 2018; 66(11): 1656
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Abstract
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1750    
    Printed29    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded226    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 2    

Recommend this journal