Glyxambi
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 8500
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

   Table of Contents      
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 66  |  Issue : 6  |  Page : 812-815

Cerebral visual impairment in children: Causes and associated ophthalmological problems


1 The David Brown Children's Eye Care Center, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh, India
2 Jasti V Ramanamma Children's Eye Care Centre, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
3 Department of Vision Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK

Date of Submission08-Jan-2018
Date of Acceptance14-Mar-2018
Date of Web Publication22-May-2018

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Niranjan Pehere
The David Brown Children's Eye Care Center, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Kode Venkatadri Chowdary Campus, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1274_17

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Purpose: The aim of this study is to identify common causes, associated ophthalmological abnormalities, and systemic comorbidities in children in Andhra Pradesh, India, with cerebral visual impairment (CVI). Methods: A retrospective review of case records of all children aged <16 years with diagnosis of CVI seen between January 2016 and December 2016 was carried out. Data were collected for their age, gender, cause of CVI, refraction, accommodation, anterior and posterior segment examination findings, and systemic problems. Results: A total of 124 patients were identified and studied (80 boys and 44 girls, mean age 5.23 years, 44.8% aged <2 years). The most common causes of CVI were hypoxic–ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) (34.4%), undetermined etiology (32.8%), neonatal seizures, and infantile spasms (16% each). The most common presenting complaints were poor vision (76%) and squint (11.2%). Profound visual impairment was seen in 88.8%, and 11.2% had high functioning CVI. Fifty-eight (46.4%) patients had significant refractive errors, 40 (32.25%) had strabismus, 4 (3.2%) had visually significant cataract, and 40 (32%) had optic atrophy. Motor delay was observed in 39.5%, speech delay was evident in 22.4%, and cognitive delay in 16%. Conclusion: HIE is the most common cause (one-third) of CVI in our population, and the majority of them presented at age <2 years (44.8%) with profound visual impairment (88.8%). A significant number of them have treatable ophthalmic conditions such as refractive errors (46.4%), accommodative insufficiency (12.1%), and cataract (3.2%), and more than one-third of them also have delay in other areas of development.

Keywords: Accommodative insufficiency, cerebral visual impairment in children, developmental delay, refractive errors


How to cite this article:
Pehere N, Chougule P, Dutton GN. Cerebral visual impairment in children: Causes and associated ophthalmological problems. Indian J Ophthalmol 2018;66:812-5

How to cite this URL:
Pehere N, Chougule P, Dutton GN. Cerebral visual impairment in children: Causes and associated ophthalmological problems. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2018 [cited 2019 Oct 22];66:812-5. Available from: http://www.ijo.in/text.asp?2018/66/6/812/232834



Cerebral or cortical visual impairment (CVI) is an overarching term covering a wide range of visual and perceptual visual impairments resulting from dysfunction, anomaly or injury to the retrogeniculate visual pathways (optic radiations, occipital cortex, and visual association areas), and oculomotor control, which is more profound if the thalamus is affected.[1] CVI has recently become the most common cause of visual impairment in children in developed countries.[2],[3],[4],[5],[6],[7],[8],[9],[10],[11] This is probably due to improved management of treatable causes of childhood blindness including cataract, glaucoma, and retinopathy of prematurity (ROP)[12] combined with improved intensive care of infants and children with cerebral pathology.[13] Improved diagnosis and increased reporting of this condition may also have led to this reported increase.[14]

In developing countries like India, increasing numbers of premature infants and babies with perinatal brain injury are surviving, leading to an increasing prevalence of CVI in children. Refractive errors and anomalies of accommodation are common in those affected.[15],[16] As a part of the syndrome, structural problems such as cataract, coloboma, optic atrophy, and retinal dystrophy may coexist.[17],[18] ROP may be seen in association with periventricular white matter injury. Optic nerve hypoplasia and optic atrophy are associated with a wide range of brain disorders, many of which impair visual function.[19] Disorders of eye movement control, including strabismus, nystagmus, unstable fixation, inaccurate fast eye movements (dysmetric saccades), deficient smooth pursuit movements, and paroxysmal deviations, in which the eyes intermittently deviate upward (most commonly) are common in children with CVI. The problems with visually guided eye movements can be compensated for in part by head movements (in children who have head control).[1],[20]

Since it is often difficult to examine such children, some of these issues may be missed. Even if they are detected, the child may not receive appropriate management if those responsible for looking after the child believe that the strategies suggested would prove ineffective. Above all, in countries with limited resources, many of these children do not receive an eye examination.

The purpose of this study was to understand common causes of CVI in our population and common ophthalmic problems that they have.


  Methods Top


We performed a retrospective review of case records of children aged < 16 years with a diagnosis of CVI, seen between January 2016 and December 2016 at The David Brown Children's Eye Care Center, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Kode Venkatadri Chowdary Campus, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh, India. The diagnosis of CVI was made when the ophthalmological findings did not explain the visual performance of the child, and there was associated neurological pathology. The following details were noted for each case: age at presentation, presenting complaint, visual acuity, cycloplegic refraction, ocular alignment and motility, and anterior and posterior segment findings. Significant refractive error was identified as per the preferred practice pattern published by the American Academy of Ophthalmology, with one modification for the hypermetropia, where we considered + 3.0 diopter sphere as a significant error, considering the fact that in children with developmental delay, low hypermetropia also becomes visually significant.[21] Cases with no significant ophthalmic pathology were labeled as isolated CVI and those with significant associated ophthalmic pathology (e.g., myopia >6D, hypermetropia >5D, and media opacities such as visually significant cataract and optic atrophy) were classified as mixed ocular visual impairment (OVI) with CVI.


  Results Top


During the study period, a total of 124 children with a diagnosis of CVI were seen. Eighty were boys and 44 were girls. The median age at presentation was 3 years (mean 5.24, standard deviation [SD] 4.61). Fifty-six (45.16%) were aged < 2 years, and among them 36 (29.03%) were infants.

The presenting complaint in the majority (95 children, 76.61%) was poor vision. Fourteen (11.3%) presented with ocular misalignment (strabismus). White reflexes from eyes (leukocoria) were noted by parents in three cases (2.42%). Some of the uncommon presenting complaints were frequent fall or tripping over things on the floor while walking (6), difficulty in walking up and down the stairs (3), slow visual responses (1), and inability to reach out to objects accurately (1).

The most common cause of CVI in our group was hypoxic–ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) seen in 50 cases (40.32%). In a significant number of children (40 cases, 32.26%) with CVI, the etiology remained unknown. Sixteen children (12.9%) had epilepsy. A history of neonatal seizures was present in 24 cases (19.36%). Other less common causes included neonatal hypoglycemia (4 cases, 3.23%), meningitis (3 cases, 2.42%), hydrocephalus (3 cases, 2.42%), and stroke (4 cases, 3.23%). Apart from these, other neurological diagnoses were cerebral palsy in 59 (47.6%) children, metabolic storage disorders in 5 (4%), and brain malformations in 2 (1.6%) cases.

Fifty-four children (43.55%) were referred by pediatricians. Eighty-four (67.74%) were born at term and forty (32.23%) were born prematurely (gestational age <34 weeks at birth). There was a history of difficulty breathing/delayed birth cry in 71 (57.26%). The mean birth weight was 2.53 kg (SD 0.76).

Sixty-one children (49.2%) had strabismus. Thirty-nine had exotropia (mean deviation 36.2 prism diopters) and 22 had esotropia (mean deviation 29.25 prism diopters). Nystagmus was found in 9 children (7.3%).

We found significant refractive error in 62 (50%) children. Compound myopic astigmatism was the most common refractive error seen in 44 children (35.48%). Five (4.03%) had high myopia (>−6.0 DS) and 6 (4.89%) had high hypermetropia (>+5.0 DS) (4 following cataract surgery). Accommodative insufficiency was present in 15 (12.1%) children, as assessed by dynamic retinoscopy. None of these children were wearing glasses at the time of presentation.

The most common anterior segment anomaly was cataract that was present bilaterally in 5 (4.03%) children (10 eyes), and morphological subtypes included total cataract (7 eyes), anterior subcapsular (2 eyes), and visually insignificant sutural cataract (1 eye). One child had bilateral lower eyelid colobomata and one child had oculocutaneous albinism. The most common posterior segment anomaly found was optic atrophy, seen in 40 cases (32.26%). Thus, we had a total of 53 (42.7%) cases of isolated CVI and 71 cases (57.3%) of mixed CVI and OVI (accommodative insufficiency 15, high myopia 5, high hypermetropia 6, visually significant cataract 5, optic atrophy 40, and oculocutaneous albinism 1).

We could get reliable visual fields by automated perimetry (Humphrey Field Analyzer) in 4 children. In two of them, there was right homonymous hemianopia and two had inferior arcuate scotoma in both the eyes. In the rest of the children, depending on the level of cooperation by the child, we used confrontation testing, the leg raise test, Puppet faces, and Lea wand test. We also enquired about any history suggestive of lower visual field impairment, such as tripping over things on the floor and difficulty in walking down the stairs. By all these methods, lower visual field impairment was found in additional 10 children. Hence, in total, 12 (9.68%) children had lower visual field impairment and 2 (1.61%) had right homonymous hemianopia.

Seventy-one children (57.26%) had delay in one or more areas of development (motor delay in 49, speech delay in 28, cognitive delay in 20, and global delay in 29 children).


  Discussion Top


The most common cause of CVI in this series was HIE. Majority of the children were aged <2 years at presentation and had delay in multiple areas of development. About half had treatable ophthalmic conditions such as significant refractive error, accommodative insufficiency, and strabismus. Four had cataract which required surgery. However, none of these problems had been known to the family. This highlights the need for regular and comprehensive eye examination for children with brain damage.

Our findings are in accordance with previous studies which have reported the prevalence of refractive errors in such children to be in the range of 10%–60%.[2],[3],[4],[5],[6],[7],[8],[9],[10],[11],[12] Accommodative insufficiency in children is frequently underdiagnosed due to lack of awareness. In this series, 12% of children were affected, and hence, it should be actively looked for in every child with CVI. These are easily treatable conditions, which should be picked up earlier in life to avoid amblyopia. But often, such children do not receive a comprehensive eye examination; since they are unable to cooperate well, it is time-consuming and sometimes the resources and workforce may be limited. In addition, it may be perceived that the correction of refractive error or performance of cataract surgery may not benefit the child, due to his neurological condition. This is arguably incorrect, and in fact, it adds an avoidable disability on top of a preexisting disability. It was our experience that on account of these issues, almost all of our patients had not previously received a complete eye examination and consequently did not get appropriate help for their visual dysfunction at an earlier stage. Hence, there is an acute need to create awareness about CVI in the ophthalmic community as well as in society in general. Since the data show that in 57.3% cases, there was combined OVI and CVI, it is important for ophthalmologists to be aware of this combination too. When treatment of the cause of OVI does not improve vision to the desired level, the additional component of CVI should be suspected, especially when the child is known to have a neurological ailment or developmental delay, and necessary steps need to be taken to optimize the visual experiences of the child.

In the fact that the majority of these children were aged < 2 years at presentation and had delays in multiple areas of development along with visual disorders, there is a need for pediatric ophthalmology units to equip themselves with the necessary skills and facilities to manage such children. Such a learning experience is usually not available during most postgraduate and fellowship training programs. This may render clinicians underconfident while dealing with such children. In view of the increasing prevalence of children with neurological issues, there is a need to include this element as an integral part of all ophthalmology training programs.

Since most of the skills impacted as part of delayed development are also vision dependent, it is important that the experts handling such issues understand how the child sees, and how any visual deficiency compounds the disability, so that they can take appropriate action and render material accessible for learning. Hence, it would be ideal if pediatric ophthalmology services also offer services for motor, speech, and cognitive delay under one roof, without requiring children to move from one place to another. We have found that this approach extends the formal scope of ophthalmic service delivery but benefits such children a lot.


  Conclusion Top


In summary, this study emphasizes the importance of comprehensive eye examination of every child with neurological problems and the need for a team approach to address challenges in other areas of development that are vision dependent. We suggest that any neonate with a stormy perinatal course of events should have an assessment of vision and an eye examination at 3 months of age and any child with a cerebral neurological ailment should undergo eye examination soon after the diagnosis when the systemic condition of the child permits.

Acknowledgment

We would like to acknowledge the support from the Hyderabad Eye Institute and Hyderabad Eye Research Foundation for the conduct of this study.

Financial support and sponsorship

This study was financially supported by Hyderabad Eye Institute (HEI) and Hyderabad Eye Research Foundation (HERF), Hyderabad.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Leuck AH, Dutton GN, editors. Vision and Brain. 1st ed. USA: AFB Press; 2015.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Ozturk T, Er D, Yaman A, Berk AT. Changing trends over the last decade in the aetiology of childhood blindness: A study from a tertiary referral centre. Br J Ophthalmol 2016;100:166-71.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]    
3.
Chong C, Dai S. Cross-sectional study on childhood cerebral visual impairment in New Zealand. Eye (Lond) 2008;22:905-11.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Bunce C, Wormald R. Causes of blind certifications in England and wales: April 1999-March 2000. J AAPOS 2014;18:71-4.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Nielsen LS, Skov L, Jensen H. Visual dysfunctions and ocular disorders in children with developmental delay. I. Prevalence, diagnoses and aetiology of visual impairment. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2007;85:149-56.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Hatton DD, Schwietz E, Boyer B, Rychwalski P. Babies count: The national registry for children with visual impairments, birth to 3 years. J AAPOS 2007;11:351-5.  Back to cited text no. 6
[PUBMED]    
7.
Matsuba CA, Jan JE. Long-term outcome of children with cortical visual impairment. Dev Med Child Neurol 2006;48:508-12.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]    
8.
Flanagan NM, Jackson AJ, Hill AE. Visual impairment in childhood: Insights from a community-based survey. Child Care Health Dev 2003;29:493-9.  Back to cited text no. 8
[PUBMED]    
9.
Alagaratnam J, Sharma TK, Lim CS, Fleck BW. A survey of visual impairment in children attending the royal blind school, Edinburgh using the WHO childhood visual impairment database. Eye (Lond) 2002;16:557-61.  Back to cited text no. 9
[PUBMED]    
10.
Rogers M. Vision impairment in liverpool: Prevalence and morbidity. Arch Dis Child 1996;74:299-303.  Back to cited text no. 10
[PUBMED]    
11.
Blohmé J, Tornqvist K. Visual impairment in Swedish children. III. Diagnoses. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1997;75:681-7.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
McClelland J, Saunders KJ, Hill N, Magee A, Shannon M, Jackson AJ, et al. The changing visual profile of children attending a regional specialist school for the visually impaired in Northern Ireland. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2007;27:556-60.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Rudanko SL, Fellman V, Laatikainen L. Visual impairment in children born prematurely from 1972 through 1989. Ophthalmology 2003;110:1639-45.  Back to cited text no. 13
[PUBMED]    
14.
Bamashmus MA, Matlhaga B, Dutton GN. Causes of blindness and visual impairment in the west of Scotland. Eye (Lond) 2004;18:257-61.  Back to cited text no. 14
[PUBMED]    
15.
Saunders KJ, McClelland JF, Richardson PM, Stevenson M. Clinical judgement of near pupil responses provides a useful indicator of focusing ability in children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol 2008;50:33-7.  Back to cited text no. 15
[PUBMED]    
16.
Saunders KJ, Little JA, McClelland JF, Jackson AJ. Profile of refractive errors in cerebral palsy: Impact of severity of motor impairment (GMFCS) and CP subtype on refractive outcome. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010;51:2885-90.  Back to cited text no. 16
[PUBMED]    
17.
Fazzi E, Signorini SG, Bova SM, La Piana R, Ondei P, Bertone C, et al. Spectrum of visual disorders in children with cerebral visual impairment. J Child Neurol 2007;22:294-301.  Back to cited text no. 17
[PUBMED]    
18.
Jacobson L, Lundin S, Flodmark O, Ellström KG. Periventricular leukomalacia causes visual impairment in preterm children. A study on the aetiologies of visual impairment in a population-based group of preterm children born 1989-95 in the county of Värmland, Sweden. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1998;76:593-8.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Zeki SM, Hollman AS, Dutton GN. Neuroradiological features of patients with optic nerve hypoplasia. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 1992;29:107-12.  Back to cited text no. 19
[PUBMED]    
20.
Jacobson L, Ygge J, Flodmark O. Nystagmus in peri-ventricular leucomalacia. Br J Ophthalmol 1998;82:1026-32.  Back to cited text no. 20
[PUBMED]    
21.
American Academy Ophthalmology. Preferred Practice Pattern – Amblyopia. San Francisco, CA, USA: American Academy Ophthalmology; 2012. p. 13.  Back to cited text no. 21
    




 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Abstract
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1323    
    Printed11    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded325    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal